Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-l7hp2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-26T04:59:30.188Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Conventional and Shallow Cages: A Summary of Research from Welfare and Production Aspects

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 September 2007

B. O. Hughes
Get access

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Research Article
Information
World's Poultry Science Journal , Volume 39 , Issue 3 , October 1983 , pp. 218 - 228
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1983

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Baiao, N. C., and Campos, E. J., (1979). Normal vs reverse cages for layers: effects on bird's performance. Poultry Science 58: 1033.Google Scholar
Bell, D., (1972). Reverse cage demonstrates striking income advantage. Poultry Digest 31: 326.Google Scholar
Bougon, M., Le Merec, M., L'Oseitalier, R., Leritoux, M. and Quemereur, P., (1978). (The effect of type of cage on performance of laying hens.) Bulletin d'Information. 18(3): 109.Google Scholar
Choudary, M. F., Adams, A. W. and Craig, J. V., (1972). Effects of strain, age at flock assembly and cage arrangement on behaviour and productivity in White Leghorn type chickens. Poultry Science 51: 1943.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cunningham, D. L., (1981). The effects of social rank and cage shape on selected behavioural and performance traits of White Leghorn layers. Poultry Science 60: 2593.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cunningham, D. L. (1982a). Layer performance in deep and shallow cages: the importance of feed intake differences. Poultry Science 61: 1927.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cunningham, D. L. (1982b). Cage type and density effects on performance and economic factors of caged layers. Poultry Science 61: 1944.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cunnigham, D. L., and Ostrander, C. E., (1981). An evaluation of layer performance in deep and shallow cages at different densities. Poultry Science 60: 2010.Google Scholar
Cunningham, D. L., and Ostrander, C. E., (1982). The effects of strain and cage shape and density on performance and fearfulness of White Leghorn layers. Poultry Science 61: 239.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dun, P., (1982). The effect of cage shape on the performance of laying stocks. The Scottish Agricultural Colleges: Research and Development Note No. 9 06 1982.Google Scholar
Fujita, H., (1973). Quantitative studies on the variation in feeding activity of chickens. II. Effect of the physical form of the feed on the feed on the feeding activity of laying hens. Japanese Poultry Science 10: 47.Google Scholar
Hibbard, A. D., (1978). Nothing to gain from packing them in. Poultry Industry March p. 21.Google Scholar
Hill, A. T., (1977). The effects of space allowance and group size on egg production traits and profitability. British Poultry Science 18: 483.Google Scholar
Hill, A. T., and Hunt, J. R., (1978). Layer cage depth effects on nervousness, feathering, shell breakage, performance and net egg returns. Poultry Science 57: 1204.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hill, A. T., and Hunt, J. R., (1980). Cage orientation effects on layer performance. Poultry Science 59: 1920.Google Scholar
Hughes, B. O., (1975). The concept of an optimum stocking density and its selection for egg production. In Economic Factors Affecting Egg Production, pp. 271–198 Ed by Freeman, B. M. and Boorman, K. N., British Poultry Science, Edinburgh.Google Scholar
Hughes, B. O., (1982). Space requirements in poultry. Proceedings of CEC Seminar on Housing and Welfare.07 1982.Aberdeen.Google Scholar
Hughes, B. O., and Black, A. J., (1976). Battery cage shape: its effect on diurnal feeding pattern, egg shell cracking and feature pecking. British Poultry Science 17: 327.Google Scholar
Hughes, B. O., and Black, A. J., (1977). Diurnal patterns of feeding and activity in relation to dietary restriction and cage shape. British Poultry Science 18: 353.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lee, D. J. W., and Bolton, W., (1976). Battery cage shape: the laying performance of medium- and light-body weight strains of hens. British Poultry Science 17: 321.Google Scholar
McBride, G., (1970). The social control of behaviour in fowls. In Aspects of Poultry Behaviour, pp. 3–13. Ed by Freeman, B. M. and Gordon, R. F., British Poultry Science, Edinburgh.Google Scholar
Martin, G. A., (1977). Shallow cage designs improve profit. Poultry Tribune 83(3): 32.Google Scholar
Martin, G. A., Carter, T. A., West, J. R., and Ward, J. B., (1980). Cage shape and space effects on layers in closed housing. Poultry Science 59: 1567.Google Scholar
Muir, F. V., and Gerry, R. W., (1976). Reverse cages and restricted feeding can be used to increase profits with brown egg layers. Feedstuffs 48(35): 18.Google Scholar
Muir, F. V., and Whelden, H. C., (1974). Performance of sex-linked females in reverse and conventional laying cages. Poultry Science 53: 1959.Google Scholar
Ouart, M. D., (1980). Effects of cage design and bird density on performance and behaviour of egg-type chickens. Dissertation Abstracts International 41(5): 1580–B.Google Scholar
Ouart, M. D., and Adams, A. W., (1978). Effect of cage depth on egg production, egg loss and laying behaviour of egg-type hens. Poultry Science 57: 1176.Google Scholar
Robinson, D., (1979). Effects of cage shape, colony size, floor area and cannibalism preventatives on laying performance. British Poultry Science 20: 345.Google Scholar
Scholtyssek, S. (1980). Kafigform und Besatzdichte in ihrer Auswirkung auf die Leistung unterschiedlicher Legehennenherkunfte. Archives fur Geflugelkunde 44: 104.Google Scholar
Swanson, M. H., and Bell, D. D., (1977). Layer performance in reverse vs conventional cages. Poultry Science 56: 1760.Google Scholar
Van Skike, K. P., and Adams, A. W., (1981). Effect of declawing and cage shape on performance of egg-type chickens. Poultry Science 60: 1747.Google Scholar