Adams, A. W. and Craig, J. V. (1984). Effect of crowding and cage shape on productivity and profitability of caged layers: a survey. Poultry Science (in press).Google Scholar

Adams, A. W. and Jackson, M. E. (1970). Effect of cage size and bird density on performance of six commercial strains of layers. Poultry Science 49: 1712–1719.Google Scholar

Adams, A. W., Craig, J. V. and Bhagwat, A. L. (1978). Effects of flock size, age at housing and mating experience on two strains of egg-type chickens in colony cages. Poultry Science 57: 48–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Allen, J. and Perry, G. C. (1975). Feather pecking and cannibalism in a caged layer flock. Poultry Science 16: 441–451.Google Scholar

Al-Rawi, B. and Craig, J. V. (1975). Agonistic behavior of caged chickens related to group size and area per bird. Applied Animal Ethology 2: 69–80.Google Scholar

Al-Rawi, B., Craig, J. V. and Adams, A. W. (1976). Agonistic behavior and egg production of caged layers: genetic strain and group-size effects. Poultry Science 55: 796–807.Google Scholar

Andrade, A. N. and Carson, J. R. (1975). The effect of age and methods of debeaking on future performance of White Leghorn Pullets. Poultry Science 54: 666–674.Google Scholar

Archer, J. (1979). Animals under Stress. University Park Press, Baltimore. MD.Google Scholar

Arthur, F. H. and Axtell, R. C. (1983). Northern Fowl Mite population development on laying hens caged at three colony sizes. Poultry Science 62: 424–427.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Bareham, J. R. (1976). A comparison of the behaviour and production of laying hens in experimental and conventional battery cages. Applied Animal Ethology 2: 291–303.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Baker, M., Brake, J. and McDaniel, G. R. (1983). The relationship between body weight loss during an induced molt and postmolt egg production. egg weight, and shell quality in caged layers. Poultry Science 62: 409–413.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Beilharz, R. G. (1982). Genetic adaptation in relation to animal welfare. International Journal for Study of Animal Problems 3: 117–124.Google Scholar

Beilharz, R. G. and Zeeb, K. (1981). Applied ethology and animal welfare. Applied Animal Ethology 7: 3–10.Google Scholar

Bell, D. (1972). Reverse cage demonstrates striking income advantage. Poultry Digest 31: 326–328.Google Scholar

Beuving, G. and Vonder, G. M. A. (1978). Daily rhythm of corticosterone in laying hens and the influence of egg laying. Journal of Reproduction and Fertility 51: 169–173.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bhagwat, A. L. and Craig, J. V. (1979). Effects of male presence on agonistic behavior and productivity of White Leghorn hens. Applied Animal Ethology 5: 267–282.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Biswas, D. K. and Craig, J. V. (1970). Genotype-environment interactions in chickens selected for high and low social dominance. Poultry Science 49: 681–692.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Biswas, D. K. and Craig, J. V.Social tension indexes and egg production traits in chickens. Poultry Science 50: 1063–1065.Google Scholar

Bronson, F. H. and Eleftheriou, B. E. (1965). Adrenal response to fighting in mice: seperation of physical and psychological causes. Science 147: 627–628.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Brown, K. I. (1982). Selecting for stress resistant animals – poultry. In Woods, W. (Ed.) Proceedings, Symposium on Management of Food Producing Animals, Vol. 1,Purdue University, W.Lafayette, IN.Google Scholar

Carey, J. B. (1983). Effect of cage design on productivity and behavior of several commercial strains of egg-type chickens. Ph.D. Thesis, Kansas State University, Manhatan, KS.Google Scholar

Carson, J. R. (1975). The effect of delayed placement and day-old debeaking on the performance of White Leghorn pullets. Poultry Science 54: 1581–1584.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Choudary, M. R., Adams, A. W. and Craig, J. V. (1972). Effects of strain, age at flock assembly, and cage arrangement on behavior and productivity in White Leghorn type chickens. Poultry Science 51: 1943–1950.Google Scholar

Compton, M. M., Vankrey, H. P., Ruszler, P. L. and Gwazdauskas, F. C. (1981a). The effects of claw removal on growth rate, gonadal steroids, and stress response in cage reared pullets. Poultry Science 60: 2120–2126.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Compton, M. M., Vankrey, H. P., Ruszler, P. L. and Gwazdauskas, F. C. (1981b). The effects of claw removal and cage design on the production performance, gonadal steroids, and stress response in caged laying hens. Poultry Science 60: 2127–2135.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Craig, J. V. (1970). Interactions of genotype and housing environment in White Leghorn chickens selected for high and low social dominance. 14th World's Poultry Congress,Madrid2: 37–42.Google Scholar

Craig, J. V. (1982). Behavioral and genetic adaptation of laying hens to high-density environments. BioScience 32: 33–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Craig, J. V. and Bhagwat, A. L. (1974). Agonistic and mating behavior of adult chickens modified by social and physical environments. Applied Animal Ethology 1: 57–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Craig, J. V. and Guhl, A. M. (1969). Territorial behavior and social interactions of pullets kept in large flocks. Poultry Science 48: 1622–1628.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Craig, J. V. and Toth, A. (1969). Productivity of pullets influenced by genetic selection for social dominance ability and by stability of flock membership. Poultry Science 48: 1729–1736.Google Scholar

Craig, J. V., Dayton, A. D., Garwood, V. A. and Lowe, P. C. (1982). Selection for egg mass in different social environments. 4. Selection response in Phase I. Poultry Science 61: 1786–1798.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Craig, J. V., Craig, T. P. and Dayton, A. D. (1983). Fearful behavior by caged hens of two genetic stocks. Applied Animal Ethology 10: 263–273.Google Scholar

Cunningham, D. L.The effects of social rank and cage shape on selected behavioral and performance traits of White Leghorn layers. Poultry Science 60: 2593–2598.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cunningham, D. L. and Van Tienhoven, A. (1983). Relationship between production factors and dominance in White Leghorn hens in a study on social rank and cage design. Applied Animal Ethology 11: 33–44.Google Scholar

Cunningham, D. L. and Van Tienhoven, A. (1984). The effects of management program and social rank on behavior and productivity of White Leghorn layers in cages. Poultry Science 63: 25–30.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Dawkins, M. (1976). Towards an objective method of assessing welfare in domestic fowl. Applied Animal Ethology 2: 245–254.Google Scholar

Dawkins, M. (1977). Do hens suffer in battery cages? Environmental preferences and welfare. Animal Behaviour 25: 1034–1046.Google Scholar

Dawkins, M. S. (1983). Battery hens name their price: consumer demand theory and the measurement of ethological “needs”. Animal Behaviour 31: 1195–1205.Google Scholar

Dickerson, G. E. and Mather, F. B. (1976). Evidence concerning genetic improvement in commercial stocks of layers. Poultry Science 55: 2327–2342.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Duncan, I. J. H. (1970). Frustration in the fowl. In Freeman, B. M. and Gordon, R. F. (Eds.) Aspects of Poultry Behaviour. British Poultry Science Ltd., Edinburgh.Google Scholar

Duncan, I. J. H. (1981). Animal rights – animal welfare: a scientist's assessment. Poultry Science 60: 489–499.Google Scholar

Duncan, I. J. H. and Dawkins, M. S. (1983). The problem of assessing “well-being” and “suffering” in farm animals. In Smidt, D. (Ed.) Indicators Relevant to Animal Welfare, CEC Seminar, Mariensee, German Federal Republic.Google Scholar

Duncan, I. J. H. and Filshie, J. H. (1979). The use of radio telemetry devices to measure temperature and heart rate in domestic fowl. In Amlaner, C. J. and Macdonald, D. W. (Eds.) A Handbook on Telemetry and Radio Tracking. Pergamon Press, Oxford.Google Scholar

Duncan, I. J. H. and Wood-Gush, D. G. M. (1971). Frustration and aggression in the domestic fowl. Animal Behaviour 19: 500–504.Google Scholar

Duncan, I. J. H. and Wood-Gush, D. G. M. (1972a). An analysis of displacement preening in the domestic fowl. Animal Behaviour 20: 68–71.Google Scholar

Duncan, I. J. H. and Wood-Gush, D. G. M. (1972b). Thwarting of feeding behaviour in the domestic fowl. Animal Behaviour 20: 444–451.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Duncan, I. J. H., Filshie, J. H. and McGee, I. J. (1975). Radiotelemetry of avian shank temperature using a thin-film hybrid microcircuit. Medical Biology and Engineering 13: 544–550.Google Scholar

Elmslie, L. J., Jones, R. H. and Knight, D. W. (1966). A general theory describing the effects of varying flock size and stocking density on the performance of caged layers. Proc., 13th World's Poultry Congress,Kiev (pp. 490–495).Google Scholar

Eskeland, B. (1981). Effects of beak trimming. In Sorensen, Y. (Ed.) Proc. First European Symposium on Poultry Welfare,Vester Farimagsgade 1,Copenhagen.Google Scholar

Etches, R. J. (1976). A radioimmunoassay for corticosterone and its application to the measurement of stress in poultry. Steroids 28: 763–773.Google Scholar

Etches, R. J. (1979). Plasma concentration of progesterone and corticosterone during the ovulation cycle of the hen (Gallus domesticus). Poultry Science 58: 211–216.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Gallup, G. G. Jr. (1977). Tonic immobility: the role of fear and predation. Psychological Record 1: 41–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gentle, M. J., Hughes, B. O. and Hubrecht, R. C. (1982). The effect of beak trimming on food intake, feeding behaviour and body weight in adult hens. Applied Animal Ethology 8: 147–159.Google Scholar

Gowe, R. S. (1956). Environmental and poultry breeding problems. 2. A comparison of the egg production of 7 White Leghorn strains housed in laying batteries and floor pens. Poultry Science 35: 430–435.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gross, W. B. (1976). Plasma steroid tendency, social environment and Eimeria necatrix infection. Poultry Science 55: 1508–1512.Google Scholar

Gross, W. B. (1983). Chicken-environment interactions. In Miller, H. B. and Williams, W. H. (Eds.) Ethics and Animals. The Humana Press, Inc., Clifton, NJ.Google Scholar

Gross, W. B. and Colmano, G. (1967). Further studies on the effects of social stress on the resistance to infection with Escherichia coli. Poultry Science 46: 41–46.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Gross, W. B. and Colmano, G. (1971). Effect of infectious agents on chickens selected for plasma corticosterone response to social stress. Poultry Science 50: 1213–1217.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Gross, W. B. and Siegel, H. S. (1965). The effect of social stress on resistance to infection with Escherichia coli or Mycoplasma gallisepticum. Poultry Science 44: 998–1001.Google Scholar

Gross, W. B. and Siegel, P. B. (1973). Effect of social stress and steroids on antibody production. Avian Diseases 17: 807–815.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Gross, W. B. and Siegel, P. B. (1980). Effects of early environmental stresses on chicken body weight, antibody response to RBC antigens, feed efficiency and response to fasting. Avian Diseases 24: 569–579.Google Scholar

Guhl, A. M. (1953). Social behavior of the domestic fowl. Kansas Agricultural Experiment Station Bulletin 73.Google Scholar

Guhl, A. M. and Allee, W. C. (1944). Some measurable effects of social organisation in flocks of hens. Physiological Zoology 17: 320–347.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Guither, H. D. and Curtis, S. E. (1983). Animal welfare developments in Europe - a perspective for the United States. Agricultural Economics 4536, Animal Science 675, University of Illinois, Urbana.Google Scholar

Hale, E. B. (1948). Observations on the social behavior of hens following debeaking. Poultry Science 27: 591–592.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hansen, R. S. (1976). Nervousness and hysteria of mature female chickens. Poultry Science 55: 531–543.Google Scholar

Harrison, R. (1964). Animal machines. Vincent Stuart, London.Google Scholar

Hembree, D. J., Adams, A. W. and Craig, J. V. (1980). Effects of force-molting by conventional and experimental light restriction methods on performance and agonistic behavior of hens. Poultry Science 59: 215–223.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hill, A. T. and Hunt, J. R. (1978). Layer cage depth effects on nervousness, feathering, shell breakage, performance and net egg returns. Poultry Science 57: 1204–1216.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hill, J. A. (1983). Indicators of stress in poultry. World's Poultry Science Journal 39: 24–31.Google Scholar

Hughes, B. O. (1976). Preference decisions of domestic hens for wire or litter floors. Applied Animal Ethology 2: 155–165.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hughes, B. O. (1979). Aggressive behaviour and its relation to oviposition in the domestic fowl. Applied Animal Ethology 5: 85–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hughes, B. O. and Black, A. J. (1973). The preference of domestic hens for different types of battery cage floor. British Poultry Science 14: 615–619.Google Scholar

Hughes, B. O. and Black, A. J. (1976). Battery cage shape: its effect on diurnal feeding pattern, egg shell cracking and feather pecking. British Poultry Science 17: 327–336.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hughes, B. O. and Black, A. J. (1977). Diurnal patterns of feeding and activity in laying hens in relation to dietary restriction and cage shape. British Poultry Science 18: 353–360.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hughes, B. O. and Michie, W. (1982). Plumage loss in medium-bodied hybrid hens: the effect of beak trimming and cage design. British Poultry Science 23: 59–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hughes, B. O. and Wood-Gush, D. G. M. (1977). Agonistic behaviour in domestic hens: the influence of housing method and group size. Animal Behaviour 25: 1056–1062.Google Scholar

Hughes, B. O., Wood-Gush, D. G. M. and Jones, R. M. (1974). Spatial organization in flocks of domestic fowls. Animal Behaviour 22: 438–445.Google Scholar

Jones, R. B. and Faure, J. M. (1981). Tonic immobility (“righting time”) in laying hens housed in cages and pens. Applied Animal Ethology 7: 369–372.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kujiyat, S. K. (1983). Genetic stock and housing environment effects on tonic immobility, avoidance behavior and quantitative traits in White Leghorn hens. M.S. Thesis, Kansas State University, Manhattan, KS.Google Scholar

Kujiyat, S. K., Craig, J. V. and Adams, A. W. (1984). Fear-related responses of White Leghorn hens of several genetic stock in five bird cages and association with quantitative traits. Poultry Science 63: 1679–1688.Google Scholar

Lee, Y.-P. and Craig, J. V. (1981a). Agonistic and nonagonistic behaviors of pullets of two dissimilar strains of White Leghorns when kept separately and intermingled. Poultry Science 60: 1759–1768.Google Scholar

Lee, Y.-P. and Craig, J. V. (1981b). Evaluation of egg-laying strains of chickens in different housing environments: role of genotype by environment interactions. Poultry Science 60: 1769–1781.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lee, Y.-P., Craig, J. V. and Dayton, A. D. (1982). The social rank index as a measure of social status and its association with egg production in White Leghorn pullets. Applied Animal Ethology 8: 377–390.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lee, K. Y., Stefanovic, M. P. and Slinger, S. J. (1972). Effects of population density on energy utilization, intestinal disaccharides, and adrenal function in hens. Canada Journal of Animal Science 52: 103–112.Google Scholar

Lowry, D. C. and Abplanalp, H. (1970). Genetic adaptation of White Leghorn hens to life in single cages. British Poultry Science 11: 117–131.Google Scholar

Lowry, D. C., Lerner, I. M. and Taylor, L. W. (1956). Intra-flock genetic merit under floor and cage environment. Poultry Science 35: 1034–1043.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

McBride, G. (1960). Poultry husbandry and the peck order. British Poultry Science 1: 65–68.Google Scholar

McBride, G. (1964). Social behaviour of domestic animals. II. Effect of the peck order on poultry productivity. Animal Production 6: 1–7.Google Scholar

McBride, G. and Foenander, F. (1962). Territorial behavior in flocks of domestic fowls. Nature 194: 102.Google Scholar

Martin, G. A., West, J. R., Morgan, G. W. and Burleson, T. R. (1976). Effects of wing and toe amputation on layers. Poultry Science 55: 2061 (Abstract).Google Scholar

Mashaly, M., Webb, M. and Roush, W. (1982). Adrenal gland response of laying hens to different cage densities. Poultry Science 61: 1506 (Abstract).Google Scholar

Mason, J. W. (1975). Emotion as reflected in patterns of endocrine integration. In Levi, I., (Ed.) Emotions: Their Parameters and Measurement. Raven Press, New York, NY.Google Scholar

Mauldin, J. M. and Siegel, P. B. (1979). “Fear”, head shaking and production in five populations of caged chickens. British Poultry Science 20: 39–44.Google Scholar

Moss, R. (Ed.) (1980). The laying hen and its environment. Martinus Nijhoff Publishers. Boston.Google Scholar

Murphy, L. B. (1978). The practical problems of recognizing and measuring fear and exploration behaviour in the domestic fowl. Animal Behaviour 26: 422–431.Google Scholar

Nash, R. F., Gallup, G. G. Jr., and Czech, D. A. (1976). Psychophysiological correlates of tonic immobility in the domestic chicken (Gallus gallus). Physiology Behaviour 17: 413–418.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

North, M. O. (1978). Commercial Chicken Production Manual. 2nd ed. AVI Publishing Company Inc., Westport, CT.Google Scholar

Ouart, M. D. and Adams, A. W. (1982a). Effects of cage design and bird density on layers. 1. Productivity, feathering, and nervousness. Poultry Science 61: 1606–1613.Google Scholar

Ouart, M. D. and Adams, A. W. (1982b). Effects of cage design and bird density on layers. 2. Bird movement and feeding behavior. Poultry Science 61: 1614–1620.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Pamment, P., Foenander, F. and McBride, G. (1983). Social and spatial organization of male behaviour in mated domestic fowl. Applied Animal Ethology 9: 341–349.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Perkins, D. Jr., (1964). Prehistoric fauna from Shanidar, Iraq. Science 144: 1565–1566.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Petersen, V. E. (1981). Deep litter and sloped wire floor housing systems. In Sorensen, Y. (Ed.) Proc. First European Symposium on Poultry Welfare,Vester Farimagsgade 1,Copenhagen.Google Scholar

Polley, C. R., Craig, J. V. and Bhagwat, A. L., (1974). Crowding and agonistic behavior: a curvilinear relationship? Poultry Science 53: 1621–1623.Google Scholar

Ratner, S. C. and Thompson, R. W. (1960). Immobility reactions (fear) of domestic fowl as a function of age and prior experiences. Animal Behaviour 8: 186–191.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Reed, C. A. (1974). The Beginnings of Animal Domestication. In Cole, H. H. and Ronning, M. (Eds.) Animal Agriculture, W. H. Freeman and Company, San Francisco, CA.Google Scholar

Robinson, D. (1979). Effects of cage shape, colony size. floor area and cannibalism prevention on laying performance. British Poultry Science 20: 345–356.Google Scholar

Rollin, B. E. (1981). Animal Rights and Human Morality. Prometheus Books, Buffalo, NY.Google Scholar

Ruszler, P. L. and Quisenberry, J. H. (1979). The effect of declawing two flock sizes of 23-week-old pullets on hysteria and certain production traits. Poultry Science 58: 778–784.Google Scholar

Sanctuary, W. C. (1932). A study of avian behaviour to determine the nature and persistency of the order of dominance in the domestic fowl and to relate these to certain physiological reactions. M.S. Thesis, Massachusetts State College, Amherst.Google Scholar

Schjelderup-Ebbe, T. (1922). Beitrage zur sozialpsychologie des haushuhns. Zeitschrift fur Psychologie 88: 225–252.Google Scholar

Scott, T. R., Satterlee, D. G. and Jacobs-Perry, L. A. (1983). Circulating corticosterone responses of feed and water deprived broilers and Japanese Quail. Poultry Science 62: 290–297.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Sefton, A. E. (1976). The interactions of cage size, cage level, social density, fearfulness, and production of Single Comb White Leghorns. Poultry Science 55: 1922–1926.Google Scholar

Sefton, A. E. and Crober, D. C. (1976). Social and physical environmental influences and caged Single Comb White Leghorn layers. Canada Journal of Animal Science 56: 733–738.Google Scholar

Selye, H. (1956). The Stress of Life. MGraw-Hill Book Company Inc., New York, NY.Google Scholar

Siegel, H. S. (1959). Egg production characteristics and adrenal function in White Leghorns confined at different floor space levels. Poultry Science 38: 893–898.Google Scholar

Siegel, H. S. and Gross, W. B. (1965). Social grouping, stress and resistance to coliform infection in cockerels. Poultry Science 44: 1530–1536.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Siegel, H. S. and Siegel, P. B. (1961). The relationship of social competition with endocrine weights and activity in male chickens. Animal Behaviour 9: 151–158.Google Scholar

Singer, P. (1975). Animal Liberation. A New Ethics for our Treatment of Animals. Avon Books, New York, NY.Google Scholar

Sorensen, Y. (Ed.) (1981). Proceedings First European Symposium on Poultry Welfare.Vester Farimagsgade 1,Copenhagen.Google Scholar

Syme, L. A. and Syme, G. J. (1983). Position in the peck order and response to human threat in domestic fowl. Applied Animal Ethology 9: 351–357.Google Scholar

Tauson, R. (1981). Need for improvement in construction of cages. In Sorensen, Y. (Ed.) Proc. First European Symposium on Poultry Welfare.Vester Farimagsgade 1.Copenhagen.Google Scholar

Tindell, D. and Craig, J. V. (1959). Effects of social competition on laying house performance in the chicken. Poultry Science 38: 95–105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Tindell, D. and Craig, J. V. (1960). Genetic variation in social aggressiveness and competition effects between sire families in small flocks of chickens. Poultry Science 39: 1318–1320.Google Scholar

Vanskike, K. P. and Adams, A. W. (1983). Effects of declawing and cage shape on productivity, feathering, and fearfulness of eggtype chickens. Poultry Science 62: 708–711.Google Scholar

Wegner, R. M. (1981). Choice of production systems for egg layers. In Sorensen, Y. (Ed.) Proc. First European Symposium on Poultry Welfare.Vester Farimagsgade 1.Copenhagen.Google Scholar

Wildey, H. E. (1982). Cages vs. floor systems for commercial layers. In Woods., W. (Ed.) Proc. Symposium on Management of Food Producing Animals, Vol. 1,Purdue University, W.Lafayette, IN.Google Scholar

Wood-Gush, D. G. M. (1972). Strain differences in response to sub-optimal stimuli in the fowl. Animal Behaviour 20: 72–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Wood-Gush, D. G. M. and Gilbert, A. B. (1969). Observations on the laying behaviour of hens in the battery cages. British Poultry Science 10: 29–36.Google Scholar