Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-mlc7c Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-05T16:40:31.613Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

An Epidemiological Investigation into Coccidiosis and Drug Resistance in Broiler Chickens*

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 September 2007

Nicole Hamet
Affiliation:
Ministère de l'Agriculture, Départment des Côtes-du-Nord, Institut d'Elevage, de Pathologie et d'Hygiène Alimentaire, 22440 Ploufragan, France.
J. Josse
Affiliation:
Ministère de l'Agriculture, Départment des Côtes-du-Nord, Institut d'Elevage, de Pathologie et d'Hygiène Alimentaire, 22440 Ploufragan, France.
B. Robin
Affiliation:
Dow Chemical France, 6 avenue Charles de Gaulle, Hall B, 78150 Le Chesnay, France.
L. Toucas
Affiliation:
Dow Chemical France, 6 avenue Charles de Gaulle, Hall B, 78150 Le Chesnay, France.
Get access

Abstract

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1985

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Ball, S. J. (1966). The responses of different strains of Eimeria acervulina and E. tenella to medication. Research Veterinary Science 7: 312.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barnet, V. (1981). Interpreting multivariate date. Editor John Wiley and Sons.Google Scholar
Benzecri, J. P. (1973). L'analyse des données. Dunod, Editeur.Google Scholar
Bretaudiere, J. P., Dumont, G., Rey, R., Bailly, M. (1981). Suitability of control materials. General principles and methods of investigation. Clinical Chemistry 27: 798.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Chapman, , (1976). Resistance of field isolates of Eimeria species to anticoccidial drugs. Avian Pathology 5: 283290.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Chapman, , (1979). Studies on the sensitivity of recent field isolates of E. maxima to monensin. Avian Pathololgy 8: 181186.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Chapman, , (1980). Studies on the sensitivity of field isolates of Eimeria maxima to combinations of anticoccidial drugs. Avian Pathology 9: 6776.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hamet, N. (1978). Mode d'action des anticoccidiens de prévention: application pratique au diagnostic et à la prévention. Conférence préunion S.A.V.—I.T.A.V.I.,Décembre.Google Scholar
Hamet, N., Robin, B., Toucas, L. (1981). Etude de la variation de l'excerétion ookystale dans differents élevages de poulets de chair. Bull. d'Inf. S.E.A. Vol 21 No. 1: 2026.Google Scholar
Hamet, N. (1981). Critère de changement d'anticoccidien. Bull. d'Inf. S.E.A. Vol. 21, No. 2Google Scholar
Hodgson, J. N., Ball, S. J., Ryan, K. C., Warren, E. W. (1969). The incidence of drug resistance strains of Eimeria in chickens in Great Britain, 1966. British Veterinary Journal 125131.Google Scholar
Babu, Jagadish K. S., Seshadri, S. J., Mohiyuddeen, S. (1976). Studies on the pathology of field cases of coccidiosis in poultry. Indian Veterinary Journal 53: 4754.Google Scholar
Jeffers, T. K. (1973). Eimeria tenella: incidence, distribution and anticoccidial drug resistance of isolants in major broiler producing areas. Avian Diseases, Vol 18, No. 1.Google Scholar
Jeffers, T. K. (1974). Eimeria acervulina and E. maxima: incidence and anticoccidial drug resistance of isolants in major broiler Producing Areas.Google Scholar
Joyner, L. P. (1970). Coccidiosis: problems arising from the development of anticoccidial drug resistance. Experimental Parasitology 28: 122128.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lebart, L., Morineau, A., Warwick, K. M. (1984). Multivariate descriptive statistical analysis. Editor John Wiley and sons.Google Scholar
Lee, E. H., Remmler, O., Fernando, M. A., Carlson, H. C. (1976). Robenidine Resistant eimeria Spp other than Eimeria maxima. The Veterinary Record, December, 4.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Long, P. L., Rowell, J. G. (1975). Sampling broiler house litter for coccidial oocysts. British Poultry Science 16: 583592.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Long, P. L., Tompkins, R. V., Millard, B. J. (1975). Coccidiosis in broilers: evaluation of infection by the examination of broiler house litter for oocysts. Avian Pathology 4: 287294.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Long, P. L., Johnson, J., Reyna, P. (1980). The use of sentinel birds to monitor coccidial infection in litter pens. Avian Disease, Vol. 24, No. 2.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
McDougald, L. R., McQuistion, (1980). Mortality from heat stress in broiler chickens influenced by anticoccidial drugs. Poultry Science 59: 24212423.Google ScholarPubMed
McDougald, L. R. (1981). Anticoccidial drug resistance in the Southeastern United States: polyether ionophorous drugs. Avian Diseases, Vol. 24, No. 2.Google Scholar
Mechow, , (1975). A technique for separating oocysts from faeces. Avian Pathology 4: 8385.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Millard, B. J. (1970). Observations on a drug resistant strain of Eimeria tenella. Research Veterinary Science, Vol. II, No. 4, July.Google Scholar
Mureau, G. (1980). Le problème des coccidioses aviaires vu par un laboratoire de diagnostics de 1967 à 1978. Cah. Med. Vet., 49: 1523.Google Scholar
Ryley, J. F., Meade, R., Hazelhurst, J., Robinsin, T. E. Methods in coccidiosis research: separation of oocysts from faeces.Google Scholar
Senik, , (1978). Method of detecting resistance to coccidiostats under field conditions. Trudy Latviiskoi Sel'Skokhozyaistvennoi Adademii, 78: 104106.Google Scholar
Smith, R., Ruff, M. (1975). A rapid technique for the cleaning and concentration of Eimeria oocysts. Poultry Science 54: 20812086.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed