Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t7fkt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-26T06:21:15.677Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Tea tree (Melaleuca alternifolia) and its essential oil: antimicrobial, antioxidant and acaricidal effects in poultry production

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 April 2019

N. PUVAČA
Affiliation:
Department of Engineering Management in Biotechnology, Faculty of Economics and Engineering Management, University Business Academy, Cvećarska 2, 21000 Novi Sad, Serbia
I. ČABARKAPA
Affiliation:
Scientific Institute of Food Technology, University of Novi Sad, Bulevar cara Lazara 1, 21000 Novi Sad, Serbia
A. PETROVIĆ*
Affiliation:
Department for Environmental and Plant Protection, Faculty of Agriculture, University of Novi Sad, Trg Dositeja Obradovića 8, 21000 Novi Sad, Serbia
V. BURSIĆ
Affiliation:
Department for Environmental and Plant Protection, Faculty of Agriculture, University of Novi Sad, Trg Dositeja Obradovića 8, 21000 Novi Sad, Serbia
R. PRODANOVIĆ
Affiliation:
Department of Engineering Management in Biotechnology, Faculty of Economics and Engineering Management, University Business Academy, Cvećarska 2, 21000 Novi Sad, Serbia
D. SOLEŠA
Affiliation:
Department of Engineering Management in Biotechnology, Faculty of Economics and Engineering Management, University Business Academy, Cvećarska 2, 21000 Novi Sad, Serbia
J. LEVIĆ
Affiliation:
Scientific Institute of Food Technology, University of Novi Sad, Bulevar cara Lazara 1, 21000 Novi Sad, Serbia
*
Corresponding author: [email protected]
Get access

Abstract

The aim of this review paper is to review the data on tea tree (Melaleuca alternifolia) as an antimicrobial, antioxidant and acaricidal in poultry production. Tea tree exhibits a wide spectrum of antimicrobial activities with minimal inhibitory concentrations between 0.12 and 4 mg/ml. Its modes of action against Gram-negative bacterium Escherichia coli (0.12 to 1.5 mg/ml), Gram-positive bacterium Staphylococcus aureus (0.12 to 1 mg/ml), Aspergillus fumigatus (1.78 mg/ml) and yeast, Candida albicans (0.05 to 0.5 mg/ml) have been investigated using a range of different methods. As an antimicrobial, tea tree has high antifungal, bacteriostatic and germicidal activity (e.g. a decrease of 73.8% in Candida sp.), because of its components such as terpinen-4-ol, α-terpineol, linalool, α-pinene, β-pinene, β-myrcene and 1,8-cineole. Its bioactive compounds such as α-terpinene, α-terpinolene and γ-terpinene show high antioxidant activity when applied in concentrations of 100 and 200 µl/ml, while its essential oils demonstrated free radical scavenging activity of 60 to 80%. Tea trees insecticidal and acaricidal properties have been tested for tick control. The mortality of ticks (Ixodes ricinus) and poultry red mites (Dermanyssus gallinae) have been recorded at levels over 60% and 80%, respectively, when used in concentrations of 0.15 to 0.30 mg/cm2 during in vitro testing, and in vivo, when sprayed in poultry houses. When tea tree was used in a form of essential oils as a dietary supplement in concentrations of 50 to 150 mg/kg in broiler chicken diets, a significant increase in daily weight (by around 7%) and decrease in morbidity and mortality were seen. Additionally, when applied in laying hen nutrition, a significant increase in daily egg production has been recorded. Tea tree essential oils when supplemented in poultry diets have high positive effects regarding productivity performance, but this requires further field experiments to clarify standardisation of the material and effective inclusion levels.

Type
Review
Copyright
Copyright © World's Poultry Science Association 2019 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

ABDEL-SHAFY, S. and ZAYED, A.A. (2002) In vitro acaricidal effect of neem seed oil (Azadirachtaindica) on egg, immature and adult stages of Hyalommaanatolicumexcavatum (Ixodoidea: Ixodidae). Veterinary Parasitology 106: 89-96.Google Scholar
AĆIMOVIĆ, M., PAVLOVIĆ, S., VARGA, A., FILIPOVIĆ, V., CVETKOVIĆ, M., STANKOVIĆ, J. and ČABARKAPA, I. (2017) Chemical composition and antibacterial activity of Angelica archangelica root essential oil. Natural Product Communications 12 (2): 205-206.Google Scholar
AĆIMOVIĆ, M., VARGA, A., CVETKOVIĆ, M., STANKOVIĆ, J. and ČABARKAPA, I. (2018) Chemical characterisation and antibacterial activity of the essential oil of wild Angelica seeds. Botanica Serbica 42 (2): 217-221.Google Scholar
BRAND, C., GRIMBALDESTON, M.A., GAMBLE, J.R., DREW, J., FINLAY JONES, J.J. and HART, P.H. (2002) Tea tree oil reduces the swelling associated with the efferent phase of a contact hypersensitivity response. Inflammation Research 51: 236-244.Google Scholar
BROPHY, J.J., DAVIES, N.W., SOUTHWELL, I.A., STIFF, I.A. and WILLIAMS, L.R. (1989) Gas chromatographic quality control for oil of Melaleucaterpinen-4-ol type (Australian tea tree). Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry 37: 1330-1335.Google Scholar
CARSON, C.F. and RILEY, T.V. (1995) Antimicrobial activity of the major components of the essential oil of Melaleuca alternifolia. Journal of Applied Bacteriology 78: 264-269.Google Scholar
CARSON, C.F. and RILEY, T.V. (2001) Safety, efficacy and provenance of tea tree (Melaleuca alternifolia) oil. Contact Dermatitis 45: 65-67.Google Scholar
CARSON, C.F., HAMMER, K.A. and RILEY, T.V. (2006) Melaleuca alternifolia (tea tree) oil: a review of antimicrobial and other medicinal properties. Clinical Microbiology Reviews 19 (1): 50-62.Google Scholar
COX, S.D., GUSTAFSON, J.E., MANN, C.M., MARKHAM, J.L., LIEW, Y.C., HARTLAND, R.P., BELL, H.C., WARMINGTON, J.R. and WYLLIE, S.G. (1998) Tea tree oil causes K+ leakage and inhibits respiration in Escherichia coli. Letters in Applied Microbiology 26: 355-358.Google Scholar
COX, S.D., MANN, C.M. and MARKHAM, J.L. (2001) Interactions between components of the essential oil of Melaleuca alternifolia. Journal of Applied Microbiology 91: 492-497.Google Scholar
COX, S.D., MANN, C.M., MARKHAM, J.L., BELL, H.C., GUSTAFSON, J.E., WARMINGTON, J.R. and WYLLIE, S.G. (2000) The mode of antimicrobial action of the essential oil of Melaleuca alternifolia (tea tree oil). Journal of Applied Microbiology 88: 170-175.Google Scholar
CUI, H., BAI, M., LI, C., LIU, R. and LIN, L. (2018) Fabrication of chitosan nanofibers containing tea tree oil liposomes against Salmonella spp. in chicken. LWT - Food Science and Technology 96: 671-678, doi: 10.1016/j.lwt.2018.06.026.Google Scholar
DING, X., YU, Y., SU, Z. and ZHANG, K. (2017) Effects of essential oils on performance, egg quality, nutrient digestibility and yolk fatty acid profile in laying hens. Animal Nutrition 3 (2): 127-131.Google Scholar
DŽINIĆ, N., PUVAČA, N., TASIĆ, T., IKONIĆ, P. and OKANOVIĆ, Đ. (2015) How meat quality and sensory perception is influenced by feeding poultry plant extracts. World's Poultry Science Journal 71: 673-681.Google Scholar
EBANI, V.V., NAJAR, B., BERTELLONI, F., PISTELLI, L., MANCIANTI, F. and NARDONI, S. (2018) Chemical composition and in vitro antimicrobial efficacy of sixteen essential oils against Escherichia coli and Aspergillus fumigatus isolated from poultry. Veterinary Sciences 5 (62): 1-13.Google Scholar
FANG, F., CANDY, K., MELLOUL, E., BERNIGAUD, C., CHAI, L., DARMON, C., DURAND, R., BOTTEREL, F., CHOSIDOW, O., IZRI, A., HUANG, W. and GUILLOT, J. (2016) In vitro activity of ten essential oils against Sarcoptesscabiei. Parasites & Vectors 9 (1): 594, doi:10.1186/s13071-016-1889-3.Google Scholar
GEORGE, D.R., SPARAGANO, O., PORT, G., OKELLO, E., SHIEL, R.S. and GUY, J.H. (2010) Environmental interactions with the toxicity of plant essential oils to the poultry red mite Dermanyssus gallinae. Medical and Veterinary Entomology 24: 1-8.Google Scholar
GIROUX, M., OUATTARA, B., YEFSAH, R., SMORAGIEWICZ, W., SAUCIER, L. and LACROIX, M. (2001) Combined effect of ascorbic acid and gamma irradiation on microbial and sensorial characteristics of beef patties during refrigerated storage. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry 49: 919-925.Google Scholar
GRACA MIGUEL, M. (2010) Antioxidant and anti-inflammatory activities of essential oils: a short review. Molecules 15: 9252-9287.Google Scholar
GULLUCE, M., SOKMEN, M., DAFERERA, D., AAR, G., OZKAN, H., KARTAL, N., POLISSIOU, M., SOKMEN, A. and SAHIN, F. (2003) In vitro antibacterial, antifungal, and antioxidant activities of the essential oil and methanol extracts of herbal parts and callus cultures of Satureja hortensis L. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry 51: 3958-3965.Google Scholar
GUSTAFSON, J.E., LIEW, Y.C., CHEW, S., MARKHAM, J.L., BELL, H.C., WYLLIE, S.G. and WARMINGTON, J.R. (1998) Effects of tea tree oil on Escherichia coli. Letters in Applied Microbiology 26: 194-198.Google Scholar
HAMMER, K.A., CARSON, C.F. and RILEY, T.V. (1998) In-vitro activity of essential oils, in particular Melaleuca alternifolia (tea tree) oil and tea tree oil products, against Candida spp. Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy 42 (5): 591-595.Google Scholar
HAMMER, K.A., CARSON, C.F. and RILEY, T.V. (2011) Effects of Melaleuca alternifolia (tea tree) essential oil and the major monoterpene component terpinen-4-ol on the development of single- and multistep antibiotic resistance and antimicrobial susceptibility. Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy 56 (2): 909-915.Google Scholar
HAMMER, K.A., CARSON, C.F., RILEY, T.V. and NIELSEN, J. (2006) A review of the toxicity of Melaleuca alternifolia (tea tree) oil. Food and Chemical Toxicology 44 (5): 616-25.Google Scholar
HART, P.H., BRAND, C., CARSON, C.F., RILEY, T.V., PRAGER, R.H. and FINLAY-JONES, J.J. (2000) Terpinen-4-ol, the main component of the essential oil of Melaleuca alternifolia (tea tree oil), suppresses inflammatory mediator production by activated human monocytes. Inflammation Research 49: 619-626.Google Scholar
HOLLIDAY, I. (2004) Melaleucas: a field and garden guide, in: Frenchs Forest, Vol. 2, pp. 16-17 (Holland, N.S.W.: Reed New Holland Publishers).Google Scholar
IDRIS, M., ABBAS, R.Z., MASOOD, S., REHMAN, T., FAROOQ, U., BABAR, W., HUSSAIN, R., RAZA, A. and RIAZ, U. (2017) The potential of antioxidant rich essential oils against avian coccidiosis, World's Poultry Science Journal 73: 89-104.Google Scholar
IORI, A., GRAZIOLI, D., GENTILE, E., MARANO, G. and SALVATORE, G. (2005) Acaricidal properties of the essential oil of Melaleuca alternifolia Cheel (tea tree oil) against nymphs of Ixodesricinus. Veterinary Parasitology 129: 173-176.Google Scholar
JURIŠIĆ, A., PETROVIĆ, A., RAJKOVIĆ, D. and NIĆIN, S. (2010) The application of lambda-cyhalothrin in tick control. Experimental and Applied Acarology 52 (1): 101-109.Google Scholar
KAAYA, G.P. (2000) The potential for antitick plants as components of an integrated tick control strategy. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences 916: 576-582.Google Scholar
KABIR MUMU, S. and MAHBOOB HOSSAIN, M. (2018) Antimicrobial activity of tea tree oil against pathogenic bacteria and comparison of its effectiveness with eucalyptus oil, lemongrass oil and conventional antibiotics. American Journal of Microbiological Research 6 (3): 73-78.Google Scholar
KHATTAK, F., RONCHI, A., CASTELLI, P. and SPARKS, N. (2014) Effects of natural blend of essential oil on growth performance, blood biochemistry, cecal morphology, and carcass quality of broiler chickens. Poultry Science 1: 132-137.Google Scholar
KIM, H.J., CHEN, F., WU, C., WANG, X., CHUNG, H.Y. and JIN, Z. (2004) Evaluation of antioxidant activity of Australian tea tree (Melaleuca alternifolia) oil and its components. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry 52: 2849-2854.Google Scholar
KOSTADINOVIĆ, L., PUVAČA, N., POPOVIĆ, S. and LEVIĆ, J. (2015) Botanical supplements as anti-coccidial alternatives in poultry nutrition. World's Poultry Science Journal 71 (1): 27-35.Google Scholar
LAM, N., LONG, X., GRIFFIN, R., CHEN, M. and DOERY, J. (2018) Can the tea tree oil (Australian native plant: Melaleuca alternifolia Cheel) be an alternative treatment for human demodicosis on skin? Parasitology 145 (12): 1510-1520.Google Scholar
LEAL, P.E., BRAGA, M.E.M., SATO, D.N., CARVALHO, J.E., MARQUES, M.O.M. and MEIRELES, M.A.A. (2003) Functional properties of spice extracts obtained via supercritical fluid extraction. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry 51: 2520-2525.Google Scholar
MALENČIĆ, Đ., KIPROVSKI, B., BURSIĆ, V., VUKOVIĆ, G., ĆUPINA, B. and MIKIĆ, A. (2018) Dietary phenolics and antioxidant capacity of selected legumes seeds from the Central Balkans. ActaAlimentaria 47 (3): 340-349.Google Scholar
MARKHAM, J.L. (1999) Biological activity of tea tree oil, in: SOUTHWELL, I. & LOWE, R. (Eds) Tea Tree, the Genus Melaleuca, pp. 169-190 (Amsterdam, Harwood Academic Publishers).Google Scholar
MCCAGE, C.M., WARD, S.M., PALING, C.A., FISHER, D.A., FLYNN, P.J. and MCLAUGHLIN, J.L. (2002) Development of a paw herbal shampoo for the removal of head lice. Phytomedicine 9 (8): 743-748.Google Scholar
MWANGI, E.N., HASSANALI, A., ESSUMAN, S., NYADAT, E., MOREKA, L. and KIMONDO, M. (1995) Repellent and acaricidal properties of Ocimum suave against Rhipicephalus appendiculatus ticks. Experimental and Applied Acarology 19: 11-18.Google Scholar
NDUMU, P.A., GEORGE, J.B.D. and CHOUDHURY, M.K. (1999) Toxicity of neem seed oil (Azadiracta indica) against the larvae of Amblyomma variegatum a three-host tick in cattle. Phytotherapy Research 13: 532-534.Google Scholar
NIMBARTE, S. and KULKARNI, A. (2013) Comparitive phytochemical analysis and resilience pattern exhibited by thyme and tea tree oil against selected poultry isolates. Journal of Agriculture and Veterinary Science 4 (4): 113-117.Google Scholar
PARK, S.N., LIM, Y., PARK, U.K., HUH, M.K. and HWANG, S.Y. (2017) The effect of antioxidant activities (DPPH, NO, ROS) by blend essential oils. European Journal of Pharmaceutical and Medical Research 4 (11): 125-129.Google Scholar
POPOVIĆ, S., PUVAČA, N., KOSTADINOVIĆ, L., DŽINIĆ, N., BOŠNJAK, J., VASILJEVIĆ, M. and ĐURAGIĆ, O. (2016) Effects of dietary essential oils on productive performance, blood lipid profile, enzyme activity and immunological response of broiler chickens. European Poultry Science 80: 1-12.Google Scholar
PRITCHARD, J., KÜSTER, T., GEORGE, D., SPARAGANO, O. and TOMLEY, F. (2016) Impeding movement of the poultry red mite, Dermanyssus gallinae. Veterinary Parasitology 225: 104-107.Google Scholar
PUVAČA, N. (2018) Bioactive compounds in selected hot spices and medicinal plants. Journal of Agronomy, Technology and Engineering Management 1 (1): 8-17.Google Scholar
PUVAČA, N., ČABARKAPA, I., BURSIĆ, V., PETROVIĆ, A. and AĆIMOVIĆ, M. (2018) Antimicrobial, antioxidant and acaricidal properties of tea tree (Melaleuca alternifolia). Journal of Agronomy, Technology and Engineering Management 1 (1): 29-38.Google Scholar
PUVAČA, N., KOSTADINOVIĆ, L., POPOVIĆ, S., LEVIĆ, J., LJUBOJEVIĆ, D., TUFARELLI, V., JOVANOVIĆ, R., TASIĆ, T., IKONIĆ, P. and LUKAČ, D. (2016) Proximate composition, cholesterol concentration and lipid oxidation of meat from chickens fed dietary spice addition (Allium sativum, Piper nigrum, Capsicum annuum). Animal Production Science 56 (11): 1920-1927.Google Scholar
PUVAČA, N., LJUBOJEVIĆ, D., KOSTADINOVIĆ, L., LUKAČ, D., LEVIĆ, J., POPOVIĆ, S. and ĐURAGIĆ, O. (2015) Spices and herbs in broilers nutrition: Effects of garlic (Allium sativum L.) on broiler chicken production. World's Poultry Science Journal 71 (3): 533-538.Google Scholar
PUVAČA, N., PETROVIĆ, A., NIKOLOVA, N., POPOVIĆ, A., ČABARKAPA, I., BURSIĆ, V., POPOVIĆ, S., ĐURAGIĆ, O. and SHTYLLA-KIKA, T. (2018a) Influence of selected essential oils as a natural repellent of poultry red mites (in vitro study). Macedonian Journal of Animal Science 8 (1): 55-59.Google Scholar
PUVAČA, N., STANAĆEV, V., GLAMOČIĆ, D., LEVIĆ, J., PERIĆ, L., STANAĆEV, V. and MILIĆ, D. (2013) Beneficial effects of phytoadditives in broiler nutrition. World's Poultry Science Journal 69: 27-34.Google Scholar
SOUTHWELL, I.A., HAYES, A.J., MARKHAM, J.L. and LEACH, D.N. (1993) The search for optimally bioactive Australian tea tree oil. Acta Horticulturae 334: 265-275.Google Scholar
SPASEVSKI, N., PUVAČA, N., PEZO, L., TASIĆ, T., VUKMIROVIĆ, Đ., BANJAC, V., ČOLOVIĆ, R., RAKITA, S., KOKIĆ, B. and DŽINIĆ, N. (2018) Optimisation of egg yolk colour using natural colourants. European Poultry Science 82: doi: 10.1399/eps.2018.246.Google Scholar
TOMASI, T., ZORTÉA, T., RODRIGUES DOS REIS, T., QUINTANA SOARES LOPES, L., DALLAMEABALDISSERA, M., CHRIST VIANNA SANTOS, R., BARETTA, D., MOURA STEFAN, L. and SCHAFER DA SILVA, A. (2018) Insecticidal action of glycerol monolaurate against the lesser mealworm (Alphitobius diaperinus) and its ecotoxicological effect on Enchytraeus crypticus. Acta Scientiae Veterinariae 46: 1581, doi: 10.22456/1679-9216.84206.Google Scholar
WALTON, S.F., MYERSCOUGH, M.R. and CURRIE, B.J. (2000) Studies in vitro on the relative efficacy of current acaricides for Sarcoptesscabiei var. hominis. Transactions of the Royal Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene 94 (1): 92-96.Google Scholar
YIM, W.T., BHANDARI, B., JACKSON, L. and JAMES, P. (2016) Repellent effects of Melaleuca alternifolia (tea tree) oil against cattle tick larvae (Rhipicephalus australis) when formulated as emulsions and in β-cyclodextrin inclusion complexes. Veterinary Parasitology 225: 99-103.Google Scholar
ZHANG, X., GUO, Y., GUO, L., JIANG, H. and JI, Q. (2018) In vitro evaluation of antioxidant and antimicrobial activities of Melaleuca alternifolia essential oil. BioMed Research International: article ID 2396109, doi.org/10.1155/2018/2396109.Google Scholar
ZHU, Q.Y., HACKMAN, R.M., ENSUNSA, J.L., HOLT, R.R. and KEEN, C.L. (2002) Antioxidative activities of oolong tea. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry 50: 6929-6934.Google Scholar