Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rcrh6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-29T18:18:23.520Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Review of life-history lighting programs for commercial laying fowls

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 March 2013

R. A. Ernst ,
J. R. Milliam  and
F. B. Mather
R. A. Ernst
Affiliation:
Department of Avian Sciences, University of California, Davis, California 95616
J. R. Milliam
Affiliation:
Department of Avian Sciences, University of California, Davis, California 95616
F. B. Mather
Affiliation:
Department of Poultry Science, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida 32611
Get access

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Research Article
Information
World's Poultry Science Journal , Volume 43 , Issue 1 , February 1987 , pp. 45 - 55
Copyright
Cambridge University Press 1987

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Adelkarim, M. R., Biellier, H. V. (1982). Effect of light intensity and photoperiod on chicken laying hens. Poultry Science 61: 1403 (Abs.)Google Scholar
Arthur, J. A. (1985). Changes in age at sexual maturity. Poultry Tribune, 10. 1985, p. 22.Google Scholar
Bell, D. D., Kuney, D. (1982). Varying the age of sexual maturity in Single Comb White Leghorn laying hens. University of California, Progress in Poultry No. 23, pp. 1–5.Google Scholar
Bell, D. D., Kuney, D. (1984). Varying the age of moving and lighting Single Comb White Leghorn laying hens. University of California, Progress in Poultry No. 28 pp. 1–7.Google Scholar
Berg, L. R., Hansen, R. S., Bearse, G. E. (1963). Effect of photoperiod on the response of developing pullets to different nutritional treatments. Poultry Science 42: 1346–1395.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Biellier, H. V., Ostmann, O. W. (1960). Effect of varying daylength on time of oviposition in domestic fowl. Missouri Agricultural Experiment Station Resource Bulletin 747: 1–52.Google Scholar
Bornstein, S., Lev, Y. (1969a). Studies with decreasing lighting regimens for early season replacement pullets under subtropical conditions. 1. A comparison of various programs. Poultry Science 48: 1919–1933.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bornstein, S., Lev, Y. (1969b). Studies with decreasing lighting regimens for early season replacement pullets under subtropical conditions. 2. A possible explanation for their effect on egg size. Poultry Science 48: 1934–1939.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bowman, J. C., Jones, R. H. (1961). Lighting techniques for the domestic fowl. II. Experiment 1959–60. British Poultry Science 2: 91–106.Google Scholar
Bowman, J. C., Jones, R. H. (1963). Lighting techniques for the domestic fowl. III. Experiment 1960–61. British Poultry Science 4: 27–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bowman, J. C., Jones, R. H., Knight, D. W. (1964). Lighting techniques for the domestic fowl. IV. Experiment 1960–62. British Poultry Science 5: 217CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bowman, J. C., Jones, R. H., Knight, D. W. (1966). Lighting techniques for the domestic fowl. V. Experiment 1960–63. British Poultry Science 7: 117–125.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bray, D. (1968). Photoperiodism and age as factors affecting the protein requirement of laying pullets. Poultry Science 47: 1005–1013.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bray, D. J., Jennings, R. C., Morris, T. R. (1965). The effect of early and late maturity on the protein repuirements of pullets. British Poultry Science 6: 311–319.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Carson, J. R., Junnila, W. A., Bacon, B. F. (1958). Sexual maturity and productivity in the chicken as affected by the quality of illumination during the growing period. Poultry Science 37: 102–112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Christmas, R. B., Douglas, C. R., Kalch, L. W., Harms, R. H. (1979). The effect of season of maturity of the laying hen on subsequent egg size at periodic intervals in the laying cycle. Poultry Science 58: 848–851.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dobie, J. B., Carver, J. S. and Roberts, J. (1946). Poultry lighting for egg production. Washington Agricultural Experiment Station Bulletin No. 471, pp. 1–27.Google Scholar
Dorminey, R. W., Parker, J. E., McCluskey, W. H. (1970). Effects of light intensity on Leghorn pullets during the development and laying periods. Poultry Science 49: 1657–1661.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Engster, H. M., Snetsinger, D. C., Ragland, W. W. (1979). Bio-mittent lighting for pullets and layers. Poultry Digest 38(453): 604, 606, 608, 610 (Nov.)Google Scholar
Follett, B. K., Sharp, P. J. (1969). Circadian rhythmicity in photoperiodically induced gonadotrophin release and gonadal growth in the quail. Nature 223: 968–971.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Harrison, P., McGinnis, J., Schumaier, G., Lauber, J. (1969a). Sexual maturity and subsequent reproductive performance of White Leghorn chickens subjected to different parts of the light spectrum. Poultry Science 48: 878–883.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Harrison, P. C., Schumaier, G., McGinnis, J. (1969b). Reproductive development and response of White Leghorn pullets subjected to increasing daylengths at different ages. Poultry Science 48: 1021–1026.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
King, D. F. (1958). Get more eggs with new lighting plan. Poultry Tribune, Feb. pp. 14–15, 26, 28.Google Scholar
King, D. F. (1959). Artificial light for growing and laying birds. Alabama Agricultural Experiment Station Program Report Series No. 72.Google Scholar
King, D. F. (1961). Effects of increasing, decreasing and constant lighting treatments on growing pullets. Poultry Science 40: 479–484.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kling, L. J., Hawes, R. O., Gerry, R. W. (1985a). Effects of early maturation, layer protein level, methionine concentration on production performance of brown-egg-type pullets. Poultry Science 64: 640–645.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kling, L. J., Hawes, R. O., Gerry, R. W., Halteman, W. A. (1985b). Effects of early maturation of brown egg-type pullets, flock uniformity, layer protein level, and cage design on egg production, egg size and egg quality. Poultry Science 64: 1050–1059.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Knit, A. R. (1980). The effect of light treatments on hatching egg performance of dwarf broiler mothers. Poultry Science 59: 629 (Abs.)Google Scholar
Leeson, S., Summers, J. D., Etches, R. J. (1979). Effect of a 28 hour light:dark cycle on egg shell quality of end of lay birds. Poultry Science 58: 285–287.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leeson, S., Summers, J. D. (1980). Effect of early light treatment and diet self-selection on laying performance. Poultry Science 59: 11–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leeson, S., Summers, J. D. (1981). Effect of rearing diet on performance of early maturing pullets. Canadian Journal Animal Science 61: 743–749.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leeson, S., Walker, J. P., Summers, J. D. (1982). Performance of laying hens subjected to intermittent lighting initiated at 24 weeks of age. Poultry Science 61: 567–568.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Leeson, S., Summers, J. D. (1985). Response of growing Leghorn pullets to long or increasing photoperiods. Poultry Science 64: 1617–1622.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lillie, R. J., Denton, C. A. (1965). Effect of lighting systems in the grower and adult periods upon the overall performance of White Leghorns. Poultry Science 44: 809–816.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lowe, R. W., Heywang, B. W. (1964). Effect of various light treatments during growing period on egg production of October hatched White Leghorn pullets. Poultry Science 43: 11–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marks, H. L., Lucas, L. M. (1967). The influence of early photoperiod lengths on birds maintained under “short days”. Poultry Science 46: 1589–1590.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mather, F. B. (1982). Intermittent lighting for layers in open-type housing. Poultry Science 61: 1507 (Abs.)Google Scholar
McClary, C. F. (1960). Genetic behavior and photoperiodism in laying chickens. Poultry Science 39: 1273–1274.Google Scholar
Moore, O. K., Mehrhof, N. R. (1946). Periodic increase in lighting versus continuous lighting for layers. Florida Agricultural Experiment Station Bulletin 420: 1–12.Google Scholar
Morris, T. R. (1962). The effects of changing daylengths on the reproductive responses of the pullet. Proceedings of 12th World's Poultry Congress Symposium Reproduction pp. 115–123.Google Scholar
Morris, T. R. (1966a). Light intensity for growing and laying pullets. World's Poultry Science 22: 156–157.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morris, T. R. (1966b). Light requirements of the fowl. Proceedings British Egg Marketing Board Symposium. “Environmental Control in Poultry Production”, pp. 15–39.Google Scholar
Morris, T. R. (1967a). The effect of light intensity on growing and laying pullets. World's Poultry Science Journal 23: 246–252.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Morris, T. R. (1967b). Lighting programs for growing and laying pullets. World's Poultry Science Journal 23: 326–335.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Morris, T. R. (1973). The effects of ahemeral light and dark cycles on egg production in the fowl. Poultry Science 52: 423–445.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Morris, T. R. (1979). The influence of light on ovulation in domestic birds. In: Animal Reproduction, ed. Hawk, H.Allanheld, Osman, New York, pp. 307–322.Google Scholar
Morris, T. R. (1985). The manipulation of egg size and egg quality. South African Journal Animal Science 15: 120–122.Google Scholar
Morris, T. R., Fox, S. (1958a). Light and sexual maturity in the domestic fowl. Nature 181: 1453CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Morris, T. R., Fox, S. (1958b). Artificial light and sexual maturity in the fowl. Nature 182: 1522–1523.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Morris, T. R., Fox, S. (1960). The use of lights to delay sexual maturity in pullets. British Poultry Science 1: 25–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morris, T. R., Fox, S. (1961). Increasing versus constant daylength for pullets. British Poultry Science 2: 59–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morris, T. R. and Owen, V. M. (1966). The effect of light intensity on egg production. Proceedings of 13th World's Poultry Congress pp. 458–461.Google Scholar
Nicholas, J. E., Callenbach, E. W., Murphy, R. R. (1944). Light intensity as a factor in the artificial illumination of pullets. Pennsylvania Agricultural Experiment Station Bulletin 462: 1–24.Google Scholar
Noles, R. K., Smith, R. E. (1964a). Rearing and maintaining pullets on controlled lighting. Poultry Science 43: 848–857.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Noles, R. K.Smith, R. E. (1964b). The response of pullets to increasing daylengths. Poultry Science 43: 1597–1598.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nordstrom, J. O. (1982). Shell quality of eggs from hens exposed to 26 and 27 hour light-dark cycles from 56 to 76 weeks of age. Poultry Science 61: 804–812.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nordstrom, J. O., Andrews, D. K. (1981). Field testing of ahemeral light-dark cycles for improving egg shell quality. Poultry Science 60: 1704 (Abs.)Google Scholar
Nordstrom, J. O., Ousterhout, L. E. (1983). Ahemeral light cycles and protein levels for older laying hens. Poultry Science 62: 525–531.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ostrander, C. E., Ringer, R. K., Zindel, H. C., Turner, C. N. (1960). The effect of various light intensities on egg production of-Single Comb White Leghorn pullets. Michigan Agricultural Station Quarterly Bulletin 43(2): 292–297.Google Scholar
Payne, G. C. (1975). Daylength during rearing and the subsequent egg production of meat-strain pullets. British Poultry Science 16: 559–563.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Proudfoot, F. G., Gowe, R. S. (1967). The effect of photoperiodism and rearing period feed restriction on the performance of five Leghorn strains. Poultry Science 46: 1056–1072.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Proudfoot, F. G., Gowe, R. S. (1974). The influence of an increasing photoperiod, a modified natural daylength and feed restriction during the rearing period on the performance of five S.C.W.L. genotypes. Poultry Science 53: 518–528.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ralston Purina Company (1980). Purina Lighting Program: Including Bio-Mittent Lighting a Poultry Industry “First”. Ralston Purina Company, Checkerboard Square, St. Louis, MO 63188.Google Scholar
Rowland, K. W. (1985). Intermittent lighting for laying fowls: A review. World's Poultry Science Journal 41: 5–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sauveur, B., Mongin, P. (1983). Performance of layers reared and/or kept under different 6 hour light dark cycles. British Poultry Science 24: 405–416.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Schumaier, G., Harrison, P. C., McGinnis, J. (1968). Effect of colored fluorescent light on growth, cannibalism, and subsequent egg production of Single Comb White Leghorn pullets. Poultry Science 47: 1599–1602.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Shanawany, M. M. (1982). The effect of ahemeral light and dark cycles on the performance of laying hens—(a review). World's Poultry Science Journal 38: 120–126.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shanawany, M. M. (1983). Sexual maturity and subsequent laying performance of fowls under normal photoperiods—a review 1950–1975. World's Poultry Science Journal 39: 38–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Siegel, H. S., Beane, W. L., Howes, C. E. (1961). The influence of two light management systems on the growth and production of commercial layers. Virginia Agricultural Experiment Station Report 54: 1–11.Google Scholar
Siegel, H. S., Beane, W. L., Howes, C. E. (1963). Lighting regimes as an influence on maturity and productivity of Leghorn-type layers. Poultry Science 42: 1064–1071.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Siopes, T. D. (1980). The effect of incandescent and fluorescent lighting on the sexual development and egg production of chickens. Poultry Science 59: 1572Google Scholar
Siopes, T. D., Wilson, W. O. (1980). A circadian rhythm in photosensitivity as the basis for the testicular response of Japanese quail to intermittent light. Poultry Science 59: 868–873.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Skoglund, W. C., Palmer, D. H., Wabeck, C. J., Verdaris, J. N. (1975). Light intensity required for maximum egg production in hens. Poultry Science 54: 1375–1378.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Skoglund, W. C., Whittaker, D. (1980). Interrupted lighting programs for brown egg breeds. Poultry Science 59: 2397–2399.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, R. E., Noles, R. K. (1963). Effects of varying daylengths on laying hen production rates and annual eggs. Poultry Science 42: 973–982.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stein, G. S., Bacon, W. L. (1976). Effect of photoperiod upon age and maintenance of sexual development in female Coturnix coturnix japonica. Poultry Science 55: 1214–1218.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
van Tienhoven, A., Ostrander, C. E. (1973). The effect of interruption of the dark period at different intervals on egg production and shell breaking strength. Poultry Science 52: 998–1001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
van Tienhoven, A., Ostrander, C. E. (1976). Short total photoperiods and egg production of White Leghorns. Poultry Science 55: 1361–1364.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
van Tienhoven, A., Ostrander, C. E., Gehle, M. (1984). Response of different commercial strains of laying hens to short total photoperiods in interrupted night experiments during days of 24 and 28 hours. Poultry Science 63: 2318–2330.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wells, R. G. (1971). A comparison of red and white light and high and low dietary protein regimens for growing pullets. British Poultry Science 12: 313–325.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilson, W. O. (1977). Lighting programs for poultry. Feedstuffs 48(7): 39–40 (Feb. 14).Google Scholar
Wilson, W. O., Abplanalp, H. (1956). Intermittent light stimuli in egg production of chickens. Poultry Science 35: 532–538.CrossRefGoogle Scholar