Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-fscjk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T23:54:01.419Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Progress towards practical options for improving biosecurity of small-scale poultry producers

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 May 2009

E. GUERNE BLEICH ,
P. PAGANI  and
N. HONHOLD
E. GUERNE BLEICH*
Affiliation:
Sub-Regional Office for Eastern Africa of the Food and Agriculture Organization, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia
P. PAGANI
Affiliation:
Sub-Regional Office for Eastern Africa of the Food and Agriculture Organization, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia
N. HONHOLD
Affiliation:
Sub-Regional Office for Eastern Africa of the Food and Agriculture Organization, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia
*
Corresponding author: [email protected]
Get access

Abstract

After more than ten years of circulation of the H5N1 HPAI virus, the number of endemically infected countries is increasing and incursion of infection into HPAI-free countries continues to occur. Human activities are the main route for the spread of the virus. There are sets of biosecurity guidelines appropriate for large-scale commercial production systems, but despite the production of many recommendations for small-scale commercial and backyard poultry systems, there has been little evidence of impact.

This paper looks at the evolution of an approach by FAO to developing sustainable biosecurity measures for use by small-scale poultry producers. It is necessary to understand the attributes of the different possible measures and how these will affect the willingness and ability of producers with limited resources to apply them and how they will disrupt production systems. Studies of poultry sectors and market chains have reinforced the complex nature of these and the numbers of people involved in them, all of whom have a role to play in implementing biosecurity measures. Developing and achieving adoption of biosecurity measures will require a multidisciplinary and participatory approach working with producers, intermediaries, live bird market traders and, for backyard poultry, communities.

Keywords

biosecurityavian influenzapoultry production
Type
Review Article
Information
World's Poultry Science Journal , Volume 65 , Issue 2 , June 2009 , pp. 211 - 216
Copyright
Copyright © Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations 2009

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

AGRIFOOD CONSULTING INTERNATIONAL, (2006) The Impact of Avian Influenza on Poultry Sector Restructuring and its Socio-economic Effects. Report prepared for FAO.Google Scholar
AGRIFOOD CONSULTING INTERNATIONAL, (2007) The Economic Impact of Highly Pathogenic Avian Influenza – Related Biosecurity Policies on the Vietnamese Poultry Sector. Report prepared for FAO.Google Scholar
BCCP/FAO, (2007) A Study on Live Bird Markets in Dhaka City and Mixed (Chickens and Ducks) Live Bird Markets in Periurban Areas away from Big Cities. Report prepared for FAO.Google Scholar
DENPASAR, (2007) The Bali poultry market chain. Report prepared for FAO.Google Scholar
FAO, (2007a) Active highly pathogenic avian influenza (HPAI) disease surveillance study in Nigeria (OSRO/NIR/602/EC).Google Scholar
FAO, (2007b) The Impact of HPAI on the Livelihoods of Poultry Producers in Laos: Implications for Policy.Google Scholar
FAO, (2007c) Poultry market chain study in North Sumatra (OSRO/RAS/602/JPN and OSRO/INT/501/NET).Google Scholar
ICASEP, (2007) Study on livelihoods impacts of poultry ban in Jakarta 2007, Chapter V CMP-HPAI Impact on livelihood and associated gender issues. Report prepared for FAO.Google Scholar
KUNG, N.Y., MORRIS, R.S., PERKINS, N.R., SIMS, L.D., ELLIS, T.M., BISSETT, L. and ET AL., (2007) Risk for infection with highly pathogenic influenza A virus (H5N1) in chickens, Hong Kong, 2002. Emerging Infectious Diseases 13: 412-418.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
LAU, E.H.Y, LEUNG, Y.H.C., ZHANG, L.J., COWLING, B.J., MAK, S.P., GUAN, Y.M., LEUNG, G.M. and PEIRIS, J.S.M. (2007) Effect of Interventions on Influenza A (H9N2) Isolation in Hong Kong's Live Poultry Markets, 1999–2005. Emerging Infectious Diseases 13: 1340-1347.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
OTTE, J., PFEIFFER, D., SOARES-MAGALHAES, R. and ROLAND-HOLST, D. (2008) Flock Size and HPAI Risk in Cambodia, Thailand, and Vietnam. Controlling Avian Flu and Protecting People's Livelihoods in the Mekong Region, HPAI Research Brief, 5.Google Scholar
PAGANI, P. and KILANY, P. (2007) Interventions for Improving Bio-Security of Small-Scale Poultry Producers in Egypt. Report prepared for FAO.Google Scholar
PEIRIS, M.J.S., DE JONG, M.D. and GUAN, Y. (2007) Avian influenza virus (H5N1): a threat to human health. Clinical Microbiology Reviews 20: 243-267.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
SENG, S. (2008) Rural livelihood and bio-security of smallholder poultry producers and poultry value chain in Cambodia. Report prepared for FAO.Google Scholar
SIMS, L.D. and BROWN, I.H. (2008) Multi-continental epidemic of H5N1 HPAI virus (1996-2007), in: Avian Influenza. 251-286 Blackwell Publishing Professional, Iowa, USA.Google Scholar
VAILLANCOURT, J.P. (2000) Cost-benefit of biosecurity. Proceedings of the 21st World's Poultry Congress, Montréal, Canada, August 20-24, 2000.Google Scholar
WHO, (2008) Writing Committee of the Second World Health Organization Consultation on Clinical Aspects of Human Infection with Avian Influenza A (H5N1) Virus: Update on Avian Influenza A (H5N1) Virus Infection in Humans. The New England Journal of Medicine 358: 261-273.Google Scholar
WORLD BANK, (2007) Turkey: Poultry keeping systems, AI and biosecurity. Report prepared for World Bank.Google Scholar