Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-p9bg8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T16:56:25.941Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Poultry meat and food safety: pre– and post-harvest approaches to reduce foodborne pathogens

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 September 2007

Hafez M. Hafez
Hafez M. Hafez
Affiliation:
Institute of Poultry Diseases, Free University Berlin, Koserstrasse 21, 14195 Berlin, Germany
Get access

Abstract

Poultry and poultry products have repeatedly been implicated as a source of foodborne infection for humans. The significant increase in the number of reported foodborne disease outbreaks worldwide has altered opinions on food safety. It has become clear that current legislation alone is inadequate, and that industry must accept a greater share of responsibility for the quality and safety of the food it produces. The fact that processing plants are not able to reduce the incidence of pathogenic bacteria effectively in poultry products means that every effort must be made to reduce infection in and/or contamination of the live birds with foodborne pathogens before dispatch to processing plants. The main control strategy should include the following: cleaning the production pyramid from the top, as in the case of Salmonella enteritidis and Salmonella typhimurium, by destroying infected flocks (with compensation), sanitising hatching eggs and limiting the introduction and spread of pathogens at the farm through Good Animal Husbandry Practices (GAHPs). To achieve GAHPs, effective measures of hygiene should be applied to poultry houses and the feed. Reducing salmonella colonisation by using antimicrobial feed additives, competitive exclusion treatment or vaccines is worth consideration. Fur-thermore, hygienic systems for catching and transporting live poultry must be included. To reduce carcass contamination during processing, thorough schedules for cleaning and disinfection of the equipment and plant are essential. Machine design must permit easy and thorough cleaning. Because the success of any food safety programme on the farm and in the processing plant depends on the hygiene practices of the staff, it is essential to incorporate education programmes for all people involved in the poultry production chain. In the farm-to-fork concept, post-processing food handling is also a very important factor in reducing foodborne infections. Finally, the development and application of acceptable methods for end product decontamination and preservation in the processing plant must be pursued.

Keywords

Foodborne pathogensSalmonellaCampylobacterverotoxin producing Escherichia coli (VETEC)poultrycontrol measuresslaughter hygiene
Type
Research Article
Information
World's Poultry Science Journal , Volume 55 , Issue 3 , September 1999 , pp. 269 - 280
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1999

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Acuff, G.R., Vandertant, C., Hanna, M.O., Ehlers, J.G., Golan, F.A. and Gardner, F.A. (1986) Prevalence of Campylobacter jejuni in turkey carcass processing and further processing of turkey products. Journal of Food Protection 49: 712–717CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ahl, A.S. and Buntain, B. (1997) Risk and food safety chain: animal health, public health and environment. Review Scientific Technical Office International Epizootics (O.I.E.) 16: 322–330CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Altmeyer, M., Krabisch, P. and Dorn, P. (1985) Zum Vorkommen und Verbreitung Campylobacter jejuni/coli in der Junggeflügel-mastproduktion. Mitteilung. Deutsche Tierärztliche Wochenschrift 92: 449–504Google Scholar
Anonymous (1994) World Health Organization guidelines on cleaning, disinfection and vector control in salmonella infected poultry flocks. WHO/Zoon World Health Organization, Geneva, p. 172Google Scholar
Barrow, P.A. (1992) Chemotherapeutic and growth-promoting antibiotics and Salmonellae in poultry. In: The Role of Antibiotics in the Control of Foodborne Pathogens (Hinton, M.H. and Mulder, R.W.A.W., Eds), COVP-DLO Het Spelderholt, pp. 111–115Google Scholar
Beery, J.T., Doyle, M.P. and Schoeni, J.L. (1985) Colonization of chicken cecae by Escherichia coli associated with hemorrhagic colitis. Applied and Environmental Microbiology 49: 310–315CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bern, C., Martines, J., De Oysa, I. and Glass, R. (1992) The magnitude of the global problem of acute diarrheal disease: a ten year update. Bulletin World Health Organization 70: 757–714Google Scholar
Bolder, N. M. (1993) Safety and economic aspects of modified atmosphere packaging (MAP) of poultry products. In: Contamination with Pathogens in Relation to Processing and Marketing of Products (Löpfe, J., Kan, C.A. and Mulder, R.W.A.W., Eds), COVP-DLO Het Spelderholt, pp. 89–94Google Scholar
Bryan, EL. and Doyle, M.P. (1995) Health risks and consequences of Salmonella and Campylobacter jejuni in raw poultry. Journal of Food Protection 58: 326–344CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Davies, R.H. and Wray, C. (1994a) Salmonella pollution in poultry units and associated enterprises. In: Pollution in Livestock Production System (Dewi, A., Axford, R. and Marai, EM., Eds), CAB International, Wallingford, pp. 137–165Google Scholar
Davies, R.H. and Wray, C. (1994b) Use of larvae of Lucilla serricata in colonization and invasion studies of Salmonella enteritidis infection in poultry. In: The Attachment of the Bacteria to the Gut (Puszati, A., Hinton, M.H. and Mulder, R.W.A.W., Eds), COVP-DLO Het Spelderholt, pp. 117–123Google Scholar
Davies, R.H. and Wray, C. (1995) Mice as carriers of Salmonella enteritidis on persistently infected poultry units. Veterinary Record 13: 337–341CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Farber, J.M. (1991) Microbiological aspects of modified atmosphere packaging technology: a review. Journal of Food Protection 54: 58–70CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fowler, N.G. and Mead, G.C. (1990) Competitive exclusion and Salmonella enteritidis. Veterinay Record 126: 489Google ScholarPubMed
Glünder, G., Spiering, N. and Hinz, K.-H. (1998) Investigation on parenteral immunization of chickens with a Campylobacter mineral oil vaccine. In: COST Action 97–5. Poultry and Food Safety (Nagy, B. and Mulder, R.W.A.W., Eds), European Communities, pp. 247–253Google Scholar
Hafez, H.M., Schroth, S., Woernle, H. and Kösters, J. (1991) Incidence of thermophilic campylobacters and their effect on turkey meat contamination during slaughtering. In: Quality of Poulty Products. III. Safety and Marketing Aspects (Mulder, R.W.A.W. and de Vries, A.W., Eds), COVP-DLO Het Spelderholt, pp. 171–179Google Scholar
Hafez, H.M., Jodas, S. and Emele, J. (1992) Practice experience using feed and water medication to control Salmonella in broiler flocks. In:The Role of Antibiotics in the Control of Foodborne Puthogens (Hinton, M.H. and Mulder, R.W.A.W., Eds), COVP-DLO Het Spelderholt, pp. 63–68Google Scholar
Hafez, H.M., Jodas, S., Kösters, J. and Schmidt, H. (1995) Treatment of Salmonella enteritidis artificially contaminated hatching eggs with pressure differential dipping (PDD) using antibiotics. Archiv für Geflügelkunde 59: 69–73Google Scholar
Hafez, H.M., Schulze, D. and Kösters, J. (1998a) Surveillance on verotoxin producing E. coli in broiler flocks and processing plants. In: COST Action 97–5. Poulty and Food Safety (Nagy, B. and Mulder, R.W.A.W., Eds), European Communities, pp. 49–55Google Scholar
Hafez, H. M., Stadler, A., Schulze, D. and Schroth, S. (1998b) Investigations on microbiological contamination of turkey and turkey meat with Salmonella, verotoxin producing E. coli and Campylobacter. In: Proceedings of the 1st International Symposium on Turkey Diseases, Berlin (Hafez, H.M. and Mazaheri, A., Eds), pp. 317–328Google Scholar
Häggblom, P. (1993) Monitoring and control of Salmonella in animal feed. In: Proceedings of International Course on Salmonella Control in Animal Production and Products. A Presentation of the Swedish Salmonella Programme (Bengtson, S.O., Ed.), WHO pp. 127–137Google Scholar
Hakkinen, M. and Schneitz, C. (1996) Efficacy of a commercial competitive exclusion product against a chicken pathogenic Escherichia coli and E. coli O157:H7. Veterinary Record 139: 139–141CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hinton, M.H. and Corry, J. (1998) The decontamination of carcass meat. In: Poultry and Food Safety (Nagy, B. and Mulder, R.W.A.W., Eds), European Communities, pp. 23–31Google Scholar
Hinton, M. and Mead, G.C. (1991a) Control of salmonella infections in broiler chickens. In: Zoonoses Control in Europe (Mulder, R.W.A.W. and Lan, C.A., Eds.), COVP-DLO Het Spelderholt, pp. 25–27Google Scholar
Hinton, M. and Mead, G.C. (1991b) Opinion. Salmonella control in poultry: the need for the satisfactory evaluation of probiotics for this purpose. Letters in Applied Microbiology 13: 49–50CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hinton, M.H., Allen, V.M., Tinker, D.B., Gibson, C. and Wathes, C.M. (1996) The dispersal of bacteria during the defeathering of poultry. In: Factors Affecting the Microbial Quality of Meat. 2. Slaughter and Dressing (Hinton, M.H. and Rowlings, C., Eds), University of Bristol Press, pp. 113–121Google Scholar
Jacobs-Reitsma, W. (1994) Epidemiology of Campylobacter in poultry. PhD thesis, Faculty of Agriculture, Wageningen, The NetherlandsGoogle Scholar
Kampelmacher, E.H. (1984) Present and future problems in Salmonella control. In: Proceeding of the International Symposium on Salmonella, New Orleans (Synoyenbos, G.H., Ed.), pp. 297–303Google Scholar
Khoury, C.A. and Meinersmann, R.J. (1995) A genetic hybrid of the Campylobacter jejuni flaA gene with LT-B of Escherichia coli and assessment of the efficacy of the hybrid protein as an oral chicken vaccine. Avian Diseases 39: 812–820CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Li, Y. and Slavic, M.F. (1996) Electric pasteurization method for reduction or elimination of bacteria on poultry carcasses and in processing water. In: Proceedings of Food Safety Consortium Annual MeetingKansas City pp. 58–67 (cited by White et al., 1997)Google Scholar
Mead, G. C. (1998) Critical control of major pathogens in poultry. In: Safe Chicken for the Next Century (Hakkinen, M., Nuotio, L., Nurmi, E. and Mead, G.C., Eds), European Communities, pp. 6–12Google Scholar
Mead, G.C., Hudson, W.R. and Hinton, M.H. (1996) Use of marker organisms for hygiene assessment and control in poultry processing. In: Factors Affecting the Microbial Quality of Meat. 2. Slaughter and Dressing (Hinton, M.H. and Rowlings, C., Eds), University of Bristol Press, pp. 13–18Google Scholar
Mead, G.C., Mulder, R.W.A.W., Fries, R., Hafez, H.M., Löpfe, J. and Salvat, G. (1997) In: Microbial Control in the Meat Industry. 2. Management in Poultry Processing Before and After Harvest (Hinton, M.H., Mead, G. C. and Rowlings, C., Eds), University of Bristol Press, pp. 1–19Google Scholar
Meyer, H., Methner, U., Martin, G. and Steinbach, G. (1998). Control of salmonella infection in poultry farm: competitive exclusion, vaccination and antimicrobial treatment: In: Poultry and Food Safety (Nagy, B. and Mulder, R.W.A.W., Eds), European Communities, pp. 115–122Google Scholar
Monk, J.D., Beuchat, L.R. and Doyle, M.P. (1995) Irradiation inactivation of food-borne micro-organisms. Journal of Food Protection 58: 197–208CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Much, P., Awad-Masalmeh, M. and Hörzer, J. (1997) Virulence factors of Shiga-toxin producing Escherichia coli isolated from animals in Austria. 2. Tes Europäisches Symposium für EHEC, lnnsbruck 1997, Fortschritte der Medizin, Monographie 84: 49Google Scholar
Mulder, R.W .A.W. (1996a) Probiotics and competitive exclusion microflora against salmonella. World Poultry Misset Salmonella Special, May pp. 30–32Google Scholar
Mulder, R.W.A.W. (1996b) The impact of slaughter technologies on microbial contamination of poultry meat. World Poultry Misset Salmonella Special, May pp. 44–46Google Scholar
Oyofo, B.A., De Loach, J.R., Corrier, D.E., Norman, J.O., Zirpin, R.L. and Mollen-Hauer, H.H. (1989) Effect of carbohydrates on Salmonella typhimurium colonization in broiler chickens. Avian Diseases 33: 531–534CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pai, C.H., Ahmed, N., Lior, H., Johnson, W.M., Sims, H.V. and Woods, D.E. (1988) Epidemiology of sporadic diarrhea due to verocytotoxin-producing Escherichia coli: a two-year prospective study. Journal of Infectious Diseases 157: 1054–1057CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pearson, A.D., Greenwood, M.H., Feltham, R.K, Healing, T.D., Donaldson, J., Jones, D.M. and Colwell, R.R. (1996) Microbial ecology of Campylobacter jejuni in a United Kingdom chicken supply chain: intermittent common source, vertical transmission, and amplification by flock propagation. Applied Environmental Microbiology 62: 4614–4620CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Renggli, F. (1996) Preventing an on-farm infection through proper feed treatment. World Poultry Misset Salmonella Special, May pp. 34–35Google Scholar
Schneitz, C. and Nuotio, L. (1992) Efficacy of different microbial preparations for controlling Salmonella colonisation in chicks and turkey poults by competitive exclusion. British Poultry Science 33: 207–211CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Schneitz, C. and Nurmi, E. (1996) Competitive exclusion in poultry production. In: Proceedings of Enteric Disease Control, 39th Annual Meeting of the American Association of Avian Pathologists, LouisvilleKentucky pp. 44–55Google Scholar
Schoeni, J.L. and Doyle, M.P. (1994) Variable colonization of chickens perorally inoculated with Escherichia coli 0157:H7 and subsequent contamination of eggs. Applied Environmental Microbiology 60: 2958–2692CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Springer, S. and Selbitz, H.J. (1996) Can a live Salmonella typhimurium vaccine be used against Salmonella enteritidis in chickens? World Poultry Misset Salmonella Special, May p. 39Google Scholar
Stals, P. (1996) Slaughter and dressing of poultry. In: Factors Affecting the Microbial Qualify of Meat. 2. Slaughter and Dressing (Hinton, M.H. and Rowlings, C., Eds), University of Bristol Press, pp. 99–106Google Scholar
Suthienkul, O., Brown, E., Seriwatana, J., Tienthogdee, S., Sastravaha, S. and Echeverria, P. (1990) Shiga-like-toxin-producing Escherichia coli in retail meats and cattle in Thailand. Applied Environmental Microbiology 56: 1135–1139CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tinker, D. B., Gibson, C., Hinton, M.H., Wathes, C.M. and Allen, V.M. (1996) Defeathering-engineering developments. In: Factors Affecting the Microbial Quality of Meat. 2. Slaughter and Dressing (Hinton, M.H. and Rowlings, C., Eds), University of Bristol Press, pp. 123–131Google Scholar
Van Der Wal, P.G. and Mulder, R.W.A.W. (1996) Modern scalding technology for pigs and poultry. In: Factors Affecting the Microbial Quality of Meat. 2. Slaughter and Dressing (Hinton, M.H. and Rowlings, C., Eds), University of Bristol Press, pp. 107–111Google Scholar
Vielitz, E., Conrad, C., Voss, M., Löhren, U., Bachmeier, J. and Hahn, I. (1992) Immunizierung gegen Salmonella-Infektionen mit Lebend- und Inactivat- Vakzinen. Deutsche Tierurztliche Wochenschriff 99: 483–485Google Scholar
Waldroup, A.L. (1996) Contamination of raw poultry with pathogens. World's Poultry Science Journal 52: 1–25CrossRefGoogle Scholar
White, P.L., Baker, A.R. and Jones, W.O. (1997) Strategies to control Salmonella and Campylobacter in raw poultry meat. Review Scientific and Technical Office International Epizootic (O.I.E.) 16: 525–541CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wray, C. and Davies, R.H. (1994) Guidelines on detection and monitoring of salmonella infected poultry flocks with particular reference to Salmonella enteritidis. World Health Organization Veterinary Public Health Unit, WHO/Zoon, World Health Organization, Geneva 94: p. 173Google Scholar