Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-l7hp2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-26T20:46:24.797Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Meat Tenderness in the Avian Species

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 April 2007

W. W. Marion
W. W. Marion
Affiliation:
Iowa State University of Science and Technology, Ames, Iowa
Get access

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Research Article
Information
World's Poultry Science Journal , Volume 23 , Issue 1 , January 1967 , pp. 6 - 19
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1967

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bendall, J. R., 1951. The shortening of rabbit muscle during rigor mortis. The relation to the breakdown of adenosine triphosphate and creatine phosphate and to muscular contraction. J. Physiol., 114: 71–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beuk, J. F., Savich, A. L. and Goeser, P. A. 1959. Method of tenderizing meat. U.S. Patent 2,903,362. Patent issued Sept. 8, 1959.Google Scholar
Bourne, G. H., 1960. The structure and function of muscle, I. Structure; II. Biochemistry and Physiology; III. Pharmacology and Disease. Academic Press, New York.Google Scholar
Brant, A. W., Forsythe, R. H. and Swanson, M. H. 1965. Consumer and retailer attitudes toward “fresh” vs. frozen fryers. Food Technol. 19(4):661–665.Google Scholar
Carlson, C. W., 1965 and earlier. Factors affecting quality and fatty acid composition of turkey meat. NCM-7 Committee Reports.Google Scholar
Chajuss, D. and Spencer, J. V. 1962. Changes in the total sulfhydryl group content and histochemical demonstration of sulfonates in excised chicken muscle aged in air. J. Food Sci. 27(5): 411–412.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chajuss, D. and Spencer, J. V. 1962. The effect of oxidizing and reducing aging media on the tenderness of excised chicken muscle. J. Food Sci. 27(3):303–305.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cori, C. F. and Cori, G. T. 1928. The mechanism of epinephrine action. I. The influence of epinephrine on the carbohydrate metabolism on fasting rates, with a note on new formation of carbohydrates. J. Biol. Chem. 79:309.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dawson, L. E., 1966. Personal Communications.Google Scholar
de Fremery, D., 1965. The effect of anesthesia during slaughter on some biochemical properties of chicken breast muscle. Poultry Sci. 44(5):1370.Google Scholar
de Fremery, D. and Pool, M. F. 1959. Rate of rigor mortis development in relation to tenderness of chicken muscle. Poultry Sci. 38(5):1180–1181.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fremery, D. and Pool, M. F. 1960. Biochemistry of chicken muscle as related to rigor mortis and tenderization. Food Research 25(1):73–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
de Fremery, D. and Pool, M. F. 1963. The influence of post-mortem glycolysis in poultry tenderness. J. Food Sci. 28(2):173–176.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dickerson, J. W. T., 1960. Biochan. The effect of growth on the composition of avian muscle. Biochem. J. 75:33–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dodge, J. W. and Stadelman, W. J. 1959. Post-mortem aging of poultry meat and its effects on the tendernes of breat muscle. Food Technol. 13(2):81–84.Google Scholar
Dodge, J. W. and Stadelman, W. J. 1960. Variability in tenderness due to struggling. Poultry Sci. 39(3):672–677.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gainer, J., Stewart, G. F. and Lowe, B. 1951. Effect of hand and machine massage on the tenderness of poultry muscles aged for short time periods. Food Research 16: 469–473.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goertz, G. E., Weathers, B. and Fry, J. L. 1962. Cooking losses, acceptability and edible yield of U.S.-graded turkey hens. Food Technol. 16(10):128–130.Google Scholar
Goertz, G. E., Weathers, B. L.Harrison, D. L. and Sanford, P. E. 1961. Tenderness scores and Warner-Bratzler shear values for broilers and Beltsville White turkeys fed different cereal grains. Poultry Sci. 40(2):488–493.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goll, D. E., 1965. The molecular biology of muscle. Iowa State University, Ames, Iowa. Mimeographed volume.Google Scholar
Goodwin, T. L., 1964. The influence of strain on the tenderness of twenty-six week old turkeys. Poultry Sci. 43(5):1323.Google Scholar
Goodwin, T. L., Bramblett, V. D.Vail, G. E. and Stadelmen, W. J. 1962. Effects of end-point temperature and cooking rate on turkey meat tenderness. Food Technol. 16(12): 101–102.Google Scholar
Goodwin, T. L., Mickelberry, W. C. and Stadelman, W. J. 1961. The influence of humane slaughter on the tenderness of turkey meat. Poultry Sdi. 40(4):921–924.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goodwin, T. L., Mickelberry, W. C. and Stadelman, W. J. 1962. The effect of freezing method of cooking and storage time on the tenderness of precooked and raw turkey meat. Poultry Sci. 41(4): 1268–1271.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goodwin, T. L., Mickelberry, W. C. and Stadelman, W. J. 1962. Methods of aging and muscle flexing and their effects upon the tendereness of turkey meat. Poultry Sci. 41(1): 193–198.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goodwin, T. L. and Stadelman, W. J., 1963. Tenderness of turkey meat as influenced by pre-cooling before processing and hand massaging. Poultry Sci. 42(2):397–402.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hanson, J. and Huxley, H. E. 1953. The structural basis of cross striations in muscle. Nature 172:530–532.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hanson, H. L., Stewart, G. F. and Lowe, B. 1942. Palatability and histological changes occurring in New York dressed broilers held at 1.7°C (35°F). Food Research 7:148–160.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harkin, A. M., Kitzmiller, C., Gilpin, G. L. and Marsden, S. J. 1958. Quality of cooked meat of turkeys fed animal or vegetable protein diets with vitamin and fat supplements. Poultry Sci. 37(6):1328–1339.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Huffman, D. L., Palmer, A. Z., Carpenter, J. W. and Shirley, R. L. 1961. The effect of ante-mortem injection of papain on tenderness of chickens. Poultry Sci. 40(6):1627–1630.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Huxley, H. E., 1953. Electron microscope studies of the organisation of the filaments in striated muscle. Biochim. Biophys. Acta. 12:387–394.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Huxley, H. E., 1956. Muscular contraction. Endeaver 15:177–188.Google Scholar
Huxley, H. E., 1957. The double array of filaments in cross-striated muscle. J. Biophys. Bio-chem. Cytol. 3:631–647.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Huxley, H. and Hanson, J. 1954. Changes in the cross-striations of muscle during contraction and stretch and their structural interpretation. Nature 173:973–976.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Khan, A. W. and Lentz, C. P. 1965. Influence of pre-rigor, rigor and post-rigor freezing on drip losses and protein changes in chicken meat. J. Food Sci. 30(5):787–790.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Khan, A. W., van den Berg, L. and Lentz, C. P. 1963. Effects of frozen storage on chicken muscle proteins. J. Food Sci. 28(4):425–430.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Khan, A. W. and van den Berg, L.Tenderness of poultry meat. 1964. Changes in chicken muscle proteins during aseptic storage at above-freezing temperatures. J. Food Sci. 29(1):49–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Khan, A. W. and van den Berg, L. 1964. Some protein changes during post-mortem tenderization in poultry meat. J. Food Sci. 29(5):597–601.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Khan, A. W. and van den Berg, L. 1965. Changes in chicken muscle proteins during cooking and subsequent frozen storage, and their significance in quality. J. Food Sci. 30(1):151–153.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Klose, A. A., Campbell, A. A.Pool, M. F. and Hanson, H. L. 1961. Turkey tenderness in relation to holding in and rate of passage through thawing range of temperature. Poultry Sci. 40(6):1633–1636.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Klose, A. A., Campbell, A. A.Hanson, H. L. and Lineweaver, H. 1961. Effect of duration and type of chilling and thawing on tenderness of frozen turkeys. Poultry Sci. 40(3): 683–688.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Klose, A. A., Pool, M. F., de Fremery, D., Campbell, A. A. and Lineweaver, H. 1960. Effect of laboratory scale agitated chilling of poultry on quality. Poultry Sci. 39: 1193–1198.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Klose, A. A., Pool, M. F., Wiele, M. B., Hanson, H. L. and Lineweaver, H. 1959. Poultry tenderness. I. Influence of processing on tenderness of turkeys. Food Technol. 13(1):20–24.Google Scholar
Kotula, A. W., Drewniak, E. E. and Davis, L. L. 1961. Experimentation with in-line carbon dioxide immobilization of chicken prior to slaughter. Poultry Sci. 40(1):213–216.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marion, W. W. and Stadelman, W. J. 1958. Effect of various freezing methods on the quality of poultry meat. Food Technol. 12:367–369.Google Scholar
Marion, W. W. and Goodman, H. M. 1966. Rote of continuous chilling in the aging of turkey. (Submitted for publication to Food Technol.).Google Scholar
Marsden, S. J., Alexander, L. M., Lamb, J. C. and Linton, G. S. 1957. Relationships among diet compostition, fleshing, fatness and edible quality of female roasting turkeys. 1. Fish products in starters and growers. Poultry Sci. 36(6):635–646.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marsden, S. J., Alexander, L. M., Lamb, J. C. and Linton, G. S. 1957. Relationship among diet compostition, fleshing, fatness and edible quality of female roasting turkeys. 2. Fish products in starters; cerial grains and oilcake meals in growers. Poultry Sci. 36(6):646–657.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
May, K. N. and Huston, T. M. 1959. Observations on the effect of sodium pentobarbital on the ease of handling and processing chickens. Poultry Sci. 38:1225.Google Scholar
May, K. N., Saffle, R. L., Downing, D. L. and Powers, J. J. 1962. Interrelations of postmortem changes in tenderness of chicken and pork. Food Technol. 16(1):72–78.Google Scholar
Miller, J. H., Dawson, L. E. and Bauer, D. H. 1965. Free amino acid content of chicken muscle from broilers and hens. J. Food Sci. 30(3):406–411.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Miller, W. O. and May, K. N.1965. Tenderness of chicken as affected by the rate of freezing, storage time and temperature, and freeze drying. Food Technol. 19(7):1171–1174.Google Scholar
Neelin, J. M. and Rose, D. 1964. Progressive changes in starch gel electrophoresis patterns of chicken muscle proteins during “aging” post-mortem. J. Food Sci. 29(5):544–554.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
North, M. O., 1941. The influence of cereal grains upon the quality of meat in turkeys. Wyoming Agri. Exp. Sta. Bul. 248.Google Scholar
Page, S. G. and Huxley, H. E. 1963. Filament lengths in striated muscle. J. Cell Biol. 19: 369–390.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Palmer, H. H., Klose, A. A., Smith, S. and Campbell, A. A. 1965. Evaluation of toughness differences in chickens in terms of consumer reaction. J. Food Sci. 30(5):898–902.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pangborn, R. M., Sharrah, N., Lewis, H. and Brant, A. W. 1965. Sensory and mechanical measurements of turkey tenderness. Food Technol. 19(8):1268–1272.Google Scholar
Paul, P. C., Sorenson, C. I. and Abplanalp, H. 1959. Variability in tenderness of chicken. Food Research 24(2):205–209.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pearson, A. M., 1963. Objective and subjective measurements for meat tenderness. Proc. Meat Tenderness Symposium, Campbell Soup Company, Camden, N. J. pp. 135–160.Google Scholar
Pool, M. F., de Fremery, D., Campbell, A. A. and Klose, A. A. 1959. Poultry Tenderness II. Influence of processing on tenderness of chicken. Food Technol. 13(1):25–29.Google Scholar
Radouco-Thomas, C., LatasteDorello, C.Zender, R.Busset, R.Meyer, H. M. and Mouton, R. F., 1959. The Antoautolytic Effect of Epinephrine in Skeletal Muscle: Nonadditive process for perservation of meat. Food Research 24: 453–482.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scharpf, L. G. Jr., and Marion, W. W. 1964. Extraction of fibrillar and sarcoplasmic proteins of turkey muscle. Food Sci. 29(3):303–306.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scharpf, L. G. Jr., Marion, W. W. and Forsythe, R. H. 1966. Post-rigor changes in selected physicochemical properties of myosin B fraction of turkey muscle. (Submitted for publication to the Journal of Food Sci.).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shannon, W. G., Marion, W. W. and Stadelman, W. J. 1957. Effect of temperature and time of scalding on the tenderness of breast meat of chicken. Food Technol. 11(5):284–286.Google Scholar
Shrimpton, D. H., 1960. Post mortem breakdown of glycogen in the muscle tissues of the domestic fowl. (on prep'n.as of 1960).Google Scholar
Shrimpton, D. H., 1960. Some causes of toughness in broilers (young roasting chickens) I. Packing station procedure, its influence on the chemical changes associated with rigor mortis and on the tenderness of the flesh. British Poultry Sci. 1(2):101–110.Google Scholar
Shrimpton, D. H. and Miller, W. S. 1960. Some causes of toughness in broilers (young roasting chickens) II. Effects of breed, management and sex. British Poultry Sci. (12):111–121.Google Scholar
Sosebee, M. E., May, K. N. and Powers, J. J. 1964. The effect of enzyme addition on thequality of freeze-dehydrated chicken meat. Food Technol. 18(4):551–554.Google Scholar
Sosebee, M. E., May, K. N. and Schmittle, S. C. 1964. The histological effects of proteolytic enzyme addition on freeze-dehydrated chicken meat. Poultry Sci. 43(3):553–559.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stadelman, W. J. and Wise, R. G. 1961. Tenderness of poultry meat. I. Effect of anesthesia, cooking, and irradiation. Food Technol. 15(6):292–294.Google Scholar
Stewart, G. F., Hanson, H. L., Lowe, B. and Austin, J. J. 1945. Effects of aging, freezing rate, and storage period on palatability of broilers. Food Research 10:16–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Strandine, E. J. and Koonz, C. H. 1963. Effect of ante-mortem enzyme application on the tenderness of turkeys. Poultry Sci. 42(5):1310.Google Scholar
Stumbo, B. A. and Stadelman, W. J. 1964. ATP determinations in freeze-dried pre-rigor poultry meat. Poultry Sci. 43(5):1637.Google Scholar
Taylor, M. H., Fry, J. L. and Smith, L. T. 1965. Factors affecting quality and tenderness in turkey steaks. Poultry Sci. 44:669–673.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
van den Berg, L., Khan, A. W. and Lentz, C. P. 1963. Biochemical and quality changes in chicken meat during storage at above-freezing temperatures. Food Technol. 17(1):91–94.Google Scholar
van den Berg, L., Lentz, C. P. and Khan, A. W. 1964. Post-mortem changes in tenderness and water-holding and ion-binding properties of poultry leg and breast meat. Food Technol. 18(4):573–575.Google Scholar
van den Berg, L., Lentz, C. P. and Khan, A. W. 1964. Changes in quality and water-holding and ion-binding properties of chicken meat during above-freezing storage under aseptic conditions. Food Technol. 18(5):729–731.Google Scholar
Weinberg, B. and Rose, D. 1960. Changes in protein extractability during post-rigor tenderization of chicken breast muscle. Food Rechnol. 14(8):376–378.Google Scholar
Whitaker, J. R., 1959. Chemical changes associated with aging of meat with emphasis on the proteins. Adv. in Food Reaserch 9: 1–60.Google Scholar
White, E. D., Hanson, H. L.Klose, A. A. and Lineweaver, H.1964. Evaluation of toughness differences in turkeys. J. Food Sci. 29(5):673–678.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wise, R. G. and Stadelman, W. J. 1957. Effect of beating by mechanical pickers on the tenderness of poultry meat. Poultry Sci. 36:1169–1170.Google Scholar
Wise, R. G. and Stadelman, W. J. 1959. Tenderness at various muscle depths associated with poultry processing techniques. Food Techn 1. 13(12):689–691.Google Scholar
Wise, R. G. and Stadelman, W. J. 1961. Tenderness of poultry meat. II. Effect of scalding procedures. Poultry Sci. 40(6):1731–1736.CrossRefGoogle Scholar