Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-p9bg8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-24T20:11:12.783Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Jungle fowl–domestic fowl relationships: a use of DNA fingerprinting

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 September 2007

P.B. Siegel ,
A. Haberfeld ,
T.K. Mukherjee ,
L.C. Stallard ,
H.L. Marks ,
N.B. Anthony  and
E.A. Dunnington
P.B. Siegel
Affiliation:
Poultry Science Department, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, Blacksburg, Virginia, USA
A. Haberfeld
Affiliation:
Poultry Science Department, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, Blacksburg, Virginia, USA
T.K. Mukherjee
Affiliation:
Institute for Advanced Studies, University of Malaya, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
L.C. Stallard
Affiliation:
Poultry Science Department, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, Blacksburg, Virginia, USA
H.L. Marks
Affiliation:
Southern Regional Poultry Genetics Laboratory, University of Georgia, Athens, Georgia, USA
N.B. Anthony
Affiliation:
Department of Poultry Science, University of Arkansas, Fayetteville, Arkansas, USA
E.A. Dunnington
Affiliation:
Poultry Science Department, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, Blacksburg, Virginia, USA
Get access

Abstract

There has been a long and continuing interest among poultry breeders and scientists in relationships of domestic fowl with their jungle fowl ancestor. Recent commercial practices in poultry breeding have greatly changed and improved the meat and egg stocks available for the production of food. There is concern, however, that artificial selection for traits of economic importance has caused a narrowing of the genetic base and subsequent reduction in genetic variability. Because continued progress in the achievement of increased growth or egg production depends heavily on genetic variability, its present status is of interest. Current techniques in molecular biology allow estimations to be made of genetic distance among populations. This paper reviews DNA fingerprinting in poultry using results from this technique to survey genetic diversity among jungle fowl, domestic fowl representative of stocks from several decades ago and today's commercial broilers and layers. The genetic distance between wild jungle fowl and layers has been found to be similar to that between wild jungle fowl and broilers. Within the two types of modern commercial fowl there is less genetic diversity among broiler than layer stocks.

Keywords

BroilersDNA fingerprintsdomestic fowlgenetic distancejungle fowl
Type
Research Article
Information
World's Poultry Science Journal , Volume 48 , Issue 2 , July 1992 , pp. 147 - 155
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1992

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

APA (1983) The American Standard of Perfection. American Poultry Association Inc., Troy, New YorkGoogle Scholar
Beebe, W. (1926) The jungle fowl. In: Pheasants, Their Lives and Homes, Vol. I. Doubleday, Page and Company, New York, pp. 196–257Google Scholar
Bruford, M.W. and Burke, T. (1991) Hypervariable DNA markers and their application in the chicken. In: DNA Fingerprinting: Approaches and Application (Eds. Burke, T., Dolf, G., Jeffreys, A.J. and Wolff, R.). Birkhauser, Verlag AG, Basel, pp. 230–242Google Scholar
Burke, T. and Bruford, M.W. (1987) DNA fingerprinting in birds. Nature 327: 149–152Google Scholar
Burke, T., Dolf, G., Jeffreys, A.J. and Wolff, R. (1991) DNA Fingerprinting: Approaches and Applications. Birkhauser, Verlag AG, BaselGoogle Scholar
Bruford, M.W., Burke, T., Hanotte, O. and Smiley, M. (1990) Hypervariable markers in the chicken genome. Proceedings IV World Congress on Genetics Applied to Livestock Production 13: 139–142Google Scholar
Crawford, R.D. (1990) Origin and history of poultry species. In: Poultry Breeding and Genetics (Ed. Crawford, R.D.). Elsevier Science Publishing Company, New York, pp. 1–42Google Scholar
Dunnington, E.A., Gal, O., Plotsky, Y. et al. (1990) DNA fingerprints of chickens selected for high and low body weight for 31 generations. Animal Genetics 21: 221–231Google Scholar
Dunnington, E.A., Gal, O., Siegel, P.B. et al. (1991) DNA fingerprint comparisons between selected populations of chickens. Poultry Science 70: 463–467Google Scholar
Gentzbittel, L. and Nicolas, P. (1991) Improvement of ‘a BASIC program to construct evolutionary trees from restriction endonuclease data’ with the use of PASCAL. Journal of Heredity 81: 491–492Google Scholar
Georges, M., Lathrop, M., Hilbert, P. et al. (1990) On the use of DNA fingerprints for linkage studies in cattle. Genomics 6: 461–474Google Scholar
Gilbert, D.A., Lehman, N., O'Brien, S.J. and Wayne, R.K. (1990) Genetic fingerprinting reflects population differentiation in the California Channel Island fox. Nature 344: 764–767Google Scholar
Gill, B., Jeffreys, A.J. and Werrett, D.J. (1985) Forensic application of DNA ‘fingerprints’. Nature 318: 577–579Google Scholar
Haberfeld, A., Dunnington, E.A. and Siegel, P.B. (1992) Genetic distances estimated from DNA fingerprints in crosses of White Plymouth Rock chickens. Animal Genetics 23: 159–165Google Scholar
Hanotte, O., Burke, T., Armour, J.A.L. and Jeffreys, A.J. (1991) Cloning, characterization and evolution of Indian peafowl Pavo cristatus minisatellite loci. In: DNA Fingerprinting: Approaches and Application (Eds. Burke, T., Dolf, G., Jeffreys, A.J., Wolff, R.). Birkhauser, Verlag AG, Basel, pp. 193–216Google Scholar
Hess, C.W. (1962) Randombred populations of the southern regional poultry breeding project. World's Poultry Science Journal 18: 147–152Google Scholar
Hillel, J., Plotsky, Y., Haberfeld, A., Lavi, U., Cahaner, A. and Jeffreys, A.J. (1989) DNA fingerprints of poultry. Animal Genetics 20: 25–35Google Scholar
Hillel, J., Schaap, T., Haberfeld, A. et al. (1990a) DNA fingerprints applied to gene introgression in breeding programs. Genetics 124: 783–789Google Scholar
Hillel, J., Avner, R., Baxter-Jones, C., Dunnington, E.A., Cahaner, A. and Siegel, P.B. (1990b) DNA fingerprints from blood mixes in chickens and turkeys. Animal Biotechnology 1: 201–204CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hillel, J., Gal, O., Siegel, P.B. and Dunnington, E.A. (1991a) Line-specific DNA fingerprint bands in lines of chickens selected for high or low antibody response to sheep erythrocytes. Archiv Geflugelkunde 55: 189–191Google Scholar
Hillel, J., Gal, O., Schappp, T. et al. (1991b) Genetic factors accountable for line-specific DNA fingerprint bands in quail. In: DNA Fingerprinting: Approaches and Application (Eds. Burke, T., Dolf, G., Jeffreys, A.J. and Wolff, R.). Birkhauser, Verlag AG, Basel, pp. 263–273Google Scholar
Hunton, P. (1990) Industrial breeding and selection. In: Poultry Breeding and Genetics (Ed. Crawford, R.D.). Elsevier Science Publishing Company, New York, pp. 985–1028Google Scholar
Hutt, F.B. (1949) Genetics of the Fowl. McGraw-Hill Book Company, New YorkGoogle Scholar
Jeffreys, A.J. (1987) Hypervariable minisatellites and DNA fingerprints. Biochemical Society Transactions 15: 309–317Google Scholar
Jeffreys, A.J. and Morton, D.B. (1987) DNA fingerprints of dogs and cats. Animal Genetics 18: 1–15Google Scholar
Jeffreys, A.J., Wilson, V. and Thein, S.L. (1985a) Hypervariable minisatellite regions in human DNA. Nature 314: 67–73Google Scholar
Jeffreys, A.J., Brookfield, J.F.Y. and Semeonoff, R. (1985b) Positive identification of an immigration test-case using human DNA fingerprints. Nature 317: 818–819Google Scholar
Jeffreys, A.J., Wilson, V., Thein, S.J., Weatherall, D.J. and Ponder, B.A.J. (1986) DNA ‘fingerprints’ and segregation analysis of multiple markers in human pedigrees. American Journal of Human Genetics 39: 11–24Google Scholar
Kuhnlein, U. and Zadworny, D. (1990) Molecular aspects of poultry breeding. Proceedings IV World Congress on Genetics Applied to Livestock Production 16: 21–30Google Scholar
Kuhnlein, U., Dawe, Y., Zadworny, D. and Gavora, J.S. (1989) DNA fingerprinting: a tool for determining genetic distances between strains of poultry. Theoretical and Applied Genetics 77: 669–672Google Scholar
Kuhnlein, U., Zadworny, D., Dawe, Y., Fairfull, R.W. and Gavora, J.S. (1990) Assessment of inbreeding by DNA fingerprinting: development of a calibration curve using defined strains of chickens. Genetics 125: 161–165Google Scholar
Kuhnlein, U., Zadworny, D., Gavora, J.S. and Fairfull, R.W. (1991) Identification of markers associated with quantitative trait loci in chickens by DNA fingerprinting. In: DNA Fingerprinting: Approaches and Application (Eds. Burke, T., Dolf, G., Jeffreys, A.J. and Wolff, R.). Birkhauser, Verlag AG, Basel, pp. 274–282Google Scholar
Nei, M. (1972) Genetic distance between populations. The American Naturalist 106: 283–292Google Scholar
Nei, M. and Li, W.H. (1979) Mathematical model for studying genetic variation in terms of restriction endonucleases. Proceedings of the National Academy of Science, USA 76: 5269–5273Google Scholar
Plotsky, Y., Cahaner, A., Haberfeld, A., Lavi, U. and Hillel, Y. (1990) Analysis of genetic association between DNA fingerprint bands and quantitative traits using DNA mixes. Proceedings IV World Congress on Genetics Applied to Livestock Production 13: 133–136Google Scholar
Reeve, H.K., Westneat, D.F., Noon, W.A., Sherman, P.W. and Aquadro, C.G. (1990) DNA ‘fingerprinting’ reveals high levels of inbreeding in colonies of eusocial naked mole-rat. Proceedings of the National Academy of Science, USA 87: 2496–2500Google Scholar
Seutin, G., Boag, P.T., White, B.N. and Ratcliffe, L.M. (1991) Sequential polyandry in the common redpoll. The Auk 108: 166–170Google Scholar
Siegel, P.B. and Dunnington, E.A. (1988) Long term selection for meat production. In: Animal Breeding Opportunities. Occasional Publications, British Society Animal Prod 12: 238–251Google Scholar
Smith, P. and Daniel, C. (1975) The Chicken Book. Little, Brown, BostonGoogle Scholar
Weatherhead, P.J. and Montgomerie, R.D. (1991) Good news and bad news about DNA fingerprinting. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 6: 173–174Google Scholar
West, B. and Zhou, B. (1989) Did chickens go north? New evidence for domestication. World's Poultry Science Journal 45: 205–218Google Scholar
Wetton, J.H., Carter, R.E., Parkin, D.T. and Walters, D. (1987) Demographic study of a wild house sparrow population by DNA fingerprinting. Nature 327: 147–149Google Scholar
Zeuner, F.E. (1963) A History of Domesticated Animals. Hutchison, LondonGoogle Scholar