Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-2plfb Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-26T03:23:58.688Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Influence of environmental and nutritional stressors on yolk sac utilization, development of chicken gastrointestinal system and its immune status

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 September 2007

M. Mikec*
Affiliation:
Croatian Veterinary Institute, Poultry Centre, Zagreb, Croatia
Z. Biđin
Affiliation:
Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, University of Zagreb, Zagreb, Croatia
A. Valentić
Affiliation:
Croatian Veterinary Institute, Poultry Centre, Zagreb, Croatia
V. Savić
Affiliation:
Croatian Veterinary Institute, Poultry Centre, Zagreb, Croatia
T. Amšel Zelenika
Affiliation:
Croatian Veterinary Institute, Poultry Centre, Zagreb, Croatia
R. Raguž-Đurić
Affiliation:
Croatian Veterinary Institute, Poultry Centre, Zagreb, Croatia
I. Lukaè Novak
Affiliation:
Croatian Veterinary Institute, Poultry Centre, Zagreb, Croatia
M. Baleńovic
Affiliation:
Croatian Veterinary Institute, Poultry Centre, Zagreb, Croatia
*
*Corresponding author: [email protected]
Get access

Abstract

The impact of practically all the everyday stress factors occurring in the first days of the chick life on the rate of the utilisation of the yolk sac content, on the chicken immune status and on the growth of the animal's body and intestinal masses was investigated. The impact of the stress was investigated during the first five days of chick's life. The chicks were divided into five groups, each comprising 44 birds. The first chick group was exposed to moderate cold (2–3°C below the optimal temperature for the chick age). The second group was exposed to moderate heat (2–3°C above the optimal temperature for the age). The third and fourth group were deprived of feed and drinking water for 12 hours and 24 hour, respectively. The fifth chick group was the control group: the birds in this group had optimal environmental conditions and received feed and drinking water immediately upon entering the trial. Ten chicks were taken every day and weighed. Their blood samples were obtained for the assessment of infectious bursal disease virus antibody titres using ELISA method. After that, the birds were sacrificed, their intestinal masses weighed and the quantity of resorbed yolk measured.

The greatest body and intestinal masses were found in the control animals. The body and intestinal masses were the lowest in the group which was denied water and food for 24 hours. The resorption of the yolk sac content was approximately equal in all the chick groups, but the resorption rate varied by days. The highest resorption was observed in the chick groups on the day when feed was denied to them, so that this high resorption could be associated with the bird's body energy requirements. The resorption of the remaining yolk is associated with feed intake: in chicks to which feed is withheld the yolk is resorbed through the yolk sac wall directly into the blood, which increased its usability. When energy requirements are not satisfied, the chick's body probably utilises resorbed antibodies from the yolk remnants, as their glycoprotein composition is suitable for this purpose.

Type
Reviews
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2006

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Anthony, N.B., Dunington, E.A. and Siegel, P.B. (1989) Embryo growth of normal and dwarf chickens from lines selected for high and low 56 day weight. Archiv für Geflügelkunde 53: 116122.Google Scholar
Baranyiova, E. and Holman, J. (1976) Morphological changes in the intestinal wall in fed and fasted chickens in the first week after hatching. Acta Veterinaria (Brno) 45: 151158.Google Scholar
Bierer, B.W. and Eleazer, T.H. (1965) Effects of feed and water deprivation on yolk utilization in chicks. Poultry Science 44: 16081609.Google Scholar
Drror, Y., Nir, I. and Nitsan, Z. (1977) The relative growth of intestinal organs in light and heavy breeds. Poultry Science 18: 493496.Google Scholar
Estaban, S., Rayo, J., Moreno, M., Sastre, M., Rial, R. and Tur, J. (1991) A role played by the vitelline diverticulum in the yolk sac resorption in young post hatched chickens. Journal of Comparative Physiology B 160: 645648.Google Scholar
Leeson, S., Walker, J.P. and Summers, J.D. (1977) Environmental temperature and the incidence of unabsorbed yolks in sexed broiler chickens. Poultry Science 56: 316318.Google Scholar
Michael, E. and Hodges, R.D. (1976) Histochemical changes in the fowl small intestine associated with enhanced absorption after feed restriction. Histochemie 36: 3949.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mikec, M., Bidin, Z. and Valentic, A. (2001) Utjecaj temperature okoliša i nač hranjenja na resorpciju žumanjčane vreçice i prirast u tovnih piliča (The impact of atmospheric temperature and feeding methods on the yolk sac resorption and broiler growth). 4th Symposium “Poultry days 2001 with International Participation”, Proceedings.PorečMay 16–19, 2001. pp. 5055.Google Scholar
Moran, E.T. (1985) Digestion and absorption of carbohydrates in fowl trough perinatal development. Journal of Nutrition 115: 665674.Google Scholar
Nir, I. and Levanon, M. (1993) Effects of posthatch holding time on performance and on residual yolk and liver composition. Poultry Science 72: 19941997.Google Scholar
Noble, R.C. and Cocchi, M. (1990) Lipid metabolism and the neonatal chicken. Progress in Lipid Research 29: 107140.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Noy, Y. and Sklan, D. (1995) Digestion and absorption in the young chick. Poultry Science 74: 366373. 17.Google Scholar
Noy, Y. and Sklan, D. (1996) Routes of yolk utilisation in the newly hatched chick. Poultry Science 75 (Abstract): 13.Google Scholar
Noy, Y. and Sklan, D. (2001) Yolk and exogenus feed utilisation in the posthach chick. Poultry Science 78: 14901495.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sander, J.E., Willinghan, E.M., Wilson, J.L. and Thayer, S.G. (1998) The effects of inoculating Enterococcus faecalis into the yolk sac on chick quality and maternal antibody absorption. Avian Diseases 42: 359363.Google Scholar
Sklan, D. (2000) Development of the digestive tract of poultry. World poultry congress. Abstracts & proceedings.Montreal20.–24.8.2000.Google Scholar
Sulaiman, A., Peebles, E.D., Pansky, T., Kellogg, T.F., Maslin, W.R. and Keirs, R.W. (1996) Histological evidence for a role of the yolk stalk in gut absorption of yolk in the posthatch broiler chick. Poultry Science (Suppl) 75: S48.Google Scholar
Uni, Z., Noy, Y. and Sklan, D. (1999) Posthatch development of small intestinal function in the poult. Poultry Science 78: 215222.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Vieira, S.L. and Moran, E.T. (1999) Effects of eggs of origin and chick posthatch nutrition on broiler live performance and meat yields. World's Poultry Science Journal 56: 125142.Google Scholar
Vieira, S.L. and Moran, E.T. (1999a) Effects of delayed placement and used litter on broiler yields. Journal of Applied Poultry Research 8: 75–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar