Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gxg78 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-24T12:27:23.508Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Hydropericardium syndrome in broiler chickens in Pakistan

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 September 2007

Saeed Akhtar
Saeed Akhtar
Affiliation:
Animal Sciences Institute, National Agricultural Research Centre, Park Road, Islamabad 45500, Pakistan
Get access

Abstract

A previously unknown disease which has spread among broiler farms in Pakistan attacks well grown 3–5 week old chickens causing 60–70% mortality. At autopsy the most prominent lesion is hydropericardium, hence the name hydropericardium syndrome. The disease is believed to be caused by a hitherto unreported virus, but one that only becomes activated when there is coinfection with an adenovirus. The results of studies on various aspects of the syndrome are highlighted, including aetiology, pathology, epidemiology, diagnosis and control. Areas requiring further research are identified.

Keywords

Broilerscontroldiagnosisdisease, aetiologyepidemiologyhydropericardium syndromePakistanvirus
Type
Research Article
Information
World's Poultry Science Journal , Volume 50 , Issue 2 , July 1994 , pp. 177 - 182
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1994

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Abdul-Aziz, T. A. and Al-Attar, M.A. (1991) New syndrome in Iraqi chicks. Veterinary Record 129: 272CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Afzal, M. and Ahmad, I. (1990) Efficacy of an inactivated vaccine against hydropericardium syndrome in broilers. Veterinary Record 126: 59–60Google ScholarPubMed
Afzal, M. and Hussain, A. (1993) Age susceptibility of different commercial broiler strains to Angara disease (hydropericardium syndrome). Pakistan Journal of Agricultural Research 14(2): (in press)Google Scholar
Afzal, M., Muneer, R. and Stein, G. (1991) Studies on the etiology of hydropericardium syndrome in broilers. Veterinary Record 128: 591–593CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ahmad, I., Afzal, M., Malik, M. I., Hussain, Z. and Hanif, W. (1989) Disease patterns and etiology of hydropericardium syndrome (Angara disease) in broiler chickens in Pakistan. Pakistan Journal of Agricultural Research 10: 195–199Google Scholar
Ahmad, I., Malik, M. I., Iqbal, K., Ahmad, K. and Naz, S. (1990) Efficacy of formalinized liver-organ-vaccine against Angara disease in broilers. Veterinarski Arhiv 60: 131–138.Google Scholar
Akhtar, S. (1992) Studies on the rate of lateral spread of hydropericardium syndrome agent(s). In: Etiology, Pathogenesis and Control of Hydropericardium Syndrome in Poultry. Board on Science and Technology for International Development (BOSTID), Washington, USA.Google Scholar
Akhtar, S. and Cheema, A. H. (1990) Some epidemiological characteristics of hydropericardium syndrome outbreaks among commercial broiler flocks in Karachi. In: Proceedings of the 3rd International Veterinary Congress,Islamabad, Pakistan,28–29 November, pp. 228–234Google Scholar
Akhtar, S. and Zahid, S. (1993) Risk indicators for Newcastle disease outbreaks in broiler flocks. In: Proceedings of the Xth International Congress of The World Veterinary Poultry Association,Sydney, Australia,16–19 August 1993. Abstract No. 159, p. 190.Google Scholar
Akhtar, S., Zahid, S. and Khan, M. I. (1992) Risk factors associated with hydropericardium syndrome in broiler flocks. Veterinary Record 131: 481–484CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Anjum, A. D. (1990) Experimental transmission of hydropericardium syndrome and protection against it in commercial broiler chickens. Avian Pathology 19: 655–660CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Anjum, A. D., Sabri, M. A. and Iqbal, Z. (1989) Hydropericarditis syndrome in broiler chicken in Pakistan. Veterinary Record 124: 247–248CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Anonymous (1988) Synopsis of the proceedings of the 1st National seminar on Hydropericardium-Pulmonary Oedema-Cum-Hepatonephritis Syndrome, Karachi. Pakistan Veterinary Medical Association p. 9Google Scholar
Benjamin, M. M. (1978) Outline of Veterinary Clinical Pathology. 3rd edn. Ames, Iowa State University PressGoogle Scholar
Bhatti, B. M., Qureshi, M. S. and Bajwa, T. M. (1988) Haematology and clinical chemistry values in broiler chickens affected with hydropericardium syndrome prevalent in Pakistan. In: Proceedings of a Seminar on Hydropericardium Syndrome in Chickens in Pakistan, Rawalpindi, 4 07 1988, pp. 121–125Google Scholar
Cheema, A. H., Afzal, M. and Ahmad, J. (1988) Studies on the causation of hydropericardium syndrome in Pakistan. In: Proceedings of a Seminar on Hydropericardium Syndrome in Chickens in Pakistan. Rawalpindi, 4 07 1988, pp. 41–48.Google Scholar
Cheema, A. H., Ahmad, J. and Afzal, M. (1989) An adenovirus infection of poultry in Pakistan. Revue Scientifique et Technique de l'Office International Epizooties 8: 789–795.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Chishti, M. A., Afzal, M. and Cheema, A. H. (1989) Preliminary studies on the development of hydropericardium syndrome of poultry. Revue Scientifique et Technique de l'Office International Epizooties 8: 797–801CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cowen, B., Mitchell, G. B. and Calnek, B. W. (1978) An adenovirus survey of poultry flocks during the growing and laying periods. Avian Diseases 22: 1125.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hasan, S. A. (1989) Pakistan is mystified by hydropericardium syndrome. Misset International Poultry 5: 35–37Google Scholar
Hassan, N. U., Afzal, M., Hameed, A. and Khan, A. R. (1993) Immune response to inactivated hydropericardium syndrome vaccine in broilers. Pakistan Veterinary Journal 14: 5–10.Google Scholar
Jaffery, M. S. (1988) A treatise on Angara disease (hydropericardium-pulmonary oedema-hepatonephritis syndrome). Pakistan Veterinary Medical Association, p. 34Google Scholar
Khan, M. Z., Siddique, M., Sabri, M. A. and Majeed, M. A. (1988) Prevalence and pathology of hydropericardium syndrome in broiler chicken. In: Proceedings of a Seminar on Hydropericardium Syndrome in Chickens in Pakistan. Rawalpindi, 4 07 1988, pp. 105–110Google Scholar
Khawaja, D. A., Ahmad, S., Rauf, A. M., Zulfiqar, M., Mahmood, S. M. I. and Hassan, M. (1988) Isolation of an adenovirus from hydropericardium syndrome in broiler chicks. Pakistan Journal of Veterinary Research 1: 2–17.Google Scholar
McFerran, J. B. and Adair, B. McC. (1977) Avian adenoviruses: a review. Avian Pathology 6: 189–217CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Muneer, M. A., Ajmal, M., Arshad, M., Ahmad, M. D., Chaudhry, Z. I. and Khan, T. M. (1989) Preliminary studies of hydropericardium syndrome in broilers in Pakistan. Zootecnica International May, 46–48Google Scholar
Niazi, A. K., Khan, M. Z. and Siddique, M. (1989) Haematological studies on naturally occurring hydropericardium syndrome in broiler chicks. Veterinary Record 124: 400CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Papasalmontos, P. (1988) A new challenge for Pakistan poultry industry. In: Proceedings of a seminar organized by Hubbard Poultry, UK at Lahore, Pakistan, 1 10 1988Google Scholar
Qureshi, A. A. (1988) Hydropericardium and kidney lesions. Poultry International 27: 48–49Google Scholar
Qureshi, A. A. (1989) Hydropericardium and ascites. Poultry International 28: 44–48Google Scholar
Qureshi, A. A. (1990) Diagnosis and control of hydropericardium. Poultry International 29: 12–14Google Scholar
Rahman, S. U., Ashfaque, M., Anjum, A. D. and Sinfhu, T. A. (1989) Indirect haemagglutination test for detecting Angara disease (hydropericardium) agent antibody. In: roceedings of International Conference and Trade Show on Poultry Production,27 February–2 March, pp. 73–74Google Scholar
Yates, V. J., Rhee, Y. O., Fry, D. E., Mishad, A. M. and McCormick, K. J. (1976) The presence of avian adenoviruses and adeno-associated viruses in healthy chickens. Avian Diseases 20: 146–152CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Zaman, T. and Khan, M. Z. (1991) Serum profiles in hydropericardium affected broiler chicks. Pakistan Veterinary Journal 11: 50–52Google Scholar