Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-gb8f7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-26T04:08:31.621Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Effects of clay on performance, moisture of droppings and health status of poultry: an overview

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 March 2015

D. OUACHEM ,
N. KABOUL ,
A. MEREDEF ,
F. ABDESSEMED  and
Z. AHMED GAID
D. OUACHEM*
Affiliation:
Food Sciences Laboratory, Institute of Veterinary and Agronomic Sciences, Batna University 05000, Algeria
N. KABOUL
Affiliation:
Food Sciences Laboratory, Institute of Veterinary and Agronomic Sciences, Batna University 05000, Algeria
A. MEREDEF
Affiliation:
Food Sciences Laboratory, Institute of Veterinary and Agronomic Sciences, Batna University 05000, Algeria
F. ABDESSEMED
Affiliation:
Food Sciences Laboratory, Institute of Veterinary and Agronomic Sciences, Batna University 05000, Algeria
Z. AHMED GAID
Affiliation:
Food Sciences Laboratory, Institute of Veterinary and Agronomic Sciences, Batna University 05000, Algeria
*
Corresponding author: [email protected]
Get access

Abstract

Following the removal of antibiotic growth promoters in animal feed, various products have been suggested as alternatives to the poultry feed industry. Among these products some types of clay or derivatives were used as a natural supply in order to optimise performance. Clay is indeed abundant naturally, cheap, widely used by hens raised outdoors voluntarily or by ingesting earthworms and soil fauna insects. As an indication it was estimated that a laying hen kept outdoors consumes 10g of soil, 7g of plant and 20g of insects and worms per day. In further studies it was reported that soil ingestion can reach 30% of dry matter intake. Considering their specific absorption capacities of ions, clays are considered real molecular sieves. Various studies have concluded that clays promote a hygienic digestive tract, increase food retention time and contribute to improving water retention and reducing the moisture content of droppings. The use of clays was accompanied by positive responses in nutrient digestibility, weight gain and feed conversion ratio. Also the addition of clay enhances meat sensorial value and organoleptic characteristics, the cutting yield and meat processing abilities. The antimicrobial and antitoxic properties of clay were shown to improve the appetite and weight gain of chickens eating food containing aflatoxins. In laying hens literature states that the use of clay improves egg size, egg internal qualities, shell strength and wet droppings. Clay use is also reported to reduce mite infestation in hens and improve ambient conditions in animal husbandry with substantially lower levels of NH3 and CH4.

Keywords

claychickengrowth performancedroppingshealth status
Type
Reviews
Information
World's Poultry Science Journal , Volume 71 , Issue 1 , March 2015 , pp. 184 - 189
Copyright
Copyright © World's Poultry Science Association 2015 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

ANDREWS, P.L.R. and HORN, C.C. (2006) Signals for nausea and emesis: implications for models of upper gastrointestinal diseases. Qutonomic Neuroscience-Basis and Clinical 125: 100-115.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
BENNETT, D.C., YEE, A., RHEE, Y.J. and CHENG, K.M. (2011) Effect of diatomaceous earth on parasite load, egg production, and egg quality of free-range organic laying hens. Poultry Science 90 (7): 1416-1426.Google Scholar
ÇABUK, M., ALÇIÇEK, A., BOZKURT, M. and AKKAN, S. (2004) Effect of yuccas chidigera and natural zeolite on broiler performance. International Journal of Poultry Science 3 (10): 651-654.Google Scholar
CHAUMANDE, B. (2011) Apport des analyses protéomique et métalloprotéomique pour l’étude de la géophagie. Thèse de Doctorat, Université de Strasbourg, France, 238p.Google Scholar
ELLIOT, M.A. and EDWARDS, H.M. Jr (1991) Comparison on the effects of synthetic and natural zeolite on laying hen and broiler chicken performance. Poultry Science 70: 2115-2130.Google Scholar
GIRARDEAU, J.P. (1987) Smectite aggregation by Escherichia coli. Acta Gastroenterolo-gica Belgica 50: 181-192.Google Scholar
GRASHORH, M.A. and BROSE, K. (1997) Quality assurance in label programs for chicken meat. Proceedings of XIII European Symposium on the Quality of Poultry Meat, Poland, 21-26 September: 619-624.Google Scholar
HERRERA, P., BURGHARDT, R.C. and PHILLIPS, T.D. (2000) Adsorption of Salmonella enteritidis by cetylpyridinium exchanged montmorillonite clays. Veterinary Microbiology 74: 259-272.Google Scholar
HU, C.H., XU, Z.R. and XIA, M.S. (2005) Antibacterial effect of Cu2+ exchanged montmorillonite on Aeromonas hydrophila and discussion on its mechanism. Veterinary Microbiology 109 (1-2): 83-88.Google Scholar
MALLEK, Z., FENDRI, I., KHANNOUS, L., BEN HASSENA, A., TRAORE, A., AYADI, M.A and GDOURA, R. (2012) Effect of zeolite (clinoptilolite) as feed additive in Tunisian broilers on the total flora, meat texture and the production of omega 3 polyunsaturated fatty acid. Lipids in Health and Disease 11 (35): 1-7.Google Scholar
MIAZZO, R., ROSA, C.A.R., DE-QUEIROZ, E.C., MAGNOLI, C., CHIACCHIERA, M., PALACIO, G., SAENZ, M., KIKOT, A., BASALDELLA, E. and DALCEROS, A. (2000) Efficacy of synthetic zeolite to reduce the toxicity of aflatoxin in broiler chicks. Poultry Science 79: 1-6.Google Scholar
MILES, R.D. and HENRY, P.R. (2007) Safety of improved Milbond-TX when fed in broiler diets at greater than recommended levels. Animal Feed Science and Technology 138 (3-4): 309-317.Google Scholar
OUACHEM, D. (2011) Optimisation de la digestion chez les ruminants et les monogastriques. Thèse de Doctorat Es-Sciences, Université el Tarf, Algérie, 126p.Google Scholar
OUACHEM, D., BAKROUNE, F., BENSALEM, A., HADJAR, A. and ABDESSEMED, F. (2011a) Effets de la marne sur le rendement en découpe et la qualité de la viande du poulet. 9emeJournées de la Recherche Avicole, Tours, 29-30 mars: 507-511.Google Scholar
OUACHEM, D., SOLTANE, M., HADJAR, A., BAKROUNE, F., KALKIL, T., BENSALEM, A., SMAILI, A., HADDAD, S. and ABDESSEMED, F. (2011b) Effects of the marl on the performance of chicken feeding starting diet containing acid oil. Banats Journal of Biotechnology 3 (2): 3-6.Google Scholar
OUACHEM, D., SOLTANE, M., KALKIL, T., SOUALAH, Z., BERGHOUTI, F., ABDESSEMED, F., MEKAOUSSI, S. and YAKHLEF, I. (2009) La marne un produit naturel dans le régime du poulet de chair : conséquences sur les performances et l’état des fientes. 8eme Journées de la Recherche Avicole, St. Malo, 25-26 mars: 507-511.Google Scholar
OUHIDA, I., PÉREZ, J.F., GASA, J. and PUCHAL, F. (2000a) Enzymes (b-glucanase and arbinoxylanase) and/or sepiolite supplementation and the nutritive value of maize-barley wheat based diets for broiler chickens. British Poultry Science 41: 617-624.Google Scholar
OUHIDA, I., PEREZ, J.F., PIEDRAFITA, J. and GASA, J. (2000b) The effect of sepiolite in broiler chicken diets of high, medium and low viscosity. Productive performance and nutritive value. Animal Feed Science and Technology 85: 183-194.Google Scholar
ÖZTÜRK, E., ERENER, G. and SARICA, M. (1998) Influence of Natural Zeolite on Performance of Laying Hens and Egg Quality. Turkish Journal of Agriculture and Forestry 22: 623-628.Google Scholar
PASHA, T.N., MAHMOOD, A., KHATTAK, F.M., ABDUL JABBAR, M. and KHAN, A.D. (2008) The effect of feed supplemented with different sodium bentonite treatments on broiler performance. Turkish Journal of Veterinary and Animal Sciences 32: 245-248.Google Scholar
PRVULOVIĆ, D., JOVANOVIĆ, G.A., STANIĆ, B., POPOVIĆ, M. and GRUBOR, L.G. (2007) Effects of a clinoptilolite supplement in pig diets on performance and serum parameters. Czech Journal of Animal Sciences 52: 159-166.Google Scholar
PRVULOVIĆ, D., KOGIĆ, D., LASIĆ, G.G. and KOSARCIĆ, S. (2008) The effects of dietary inclusion of hydrated aluminosilicate on performance and biochemical parameters of broiler chickens. Turkish Journal of Veterinary and Animal Sciences 32: 183-189.Google Scholar
QUISENBERRY, J.H. and BRADLEY, J.W. (1964) Sodium bentonite feeding experiments. Feed stuffs 36: 22-23.Google Scholar
RIZZI, L., SIMIOLI, M., RONCADA, P. and ZAGHINI, A. (2003) Aflatoxin B1 and clinoptilolite in feed for laying hens: effects on egg quality, mycotoxin residues in livers, and hepatic mixed function oxygenase activities. Journal of Food Protection 66 (5): 860-865.Google Scholar
ROLAND, D.A. (1988) Further studies of effects of phosphorus and aluminosilicates on eggshell quality. Poultry Science 67: 577-584.Google Scholar
ROLAND, D.A. (1990) The relationship of dietary phosphorus and sodium aluminosilicate to the performance of commercial leghorns. Poultry Science 69: 105-112.Google Scholar
SAFAEI, K.M., BOLDAJI, F., DASTAR, B. and KHAN, A.D. (2010) Effect of different levels of kaolin, bentonite and zeolite on broilers performance. Journal of Biological Sciences 10 (1): 58-62.Google Scholar
SOUTHERN, L.L., WARD, T.L., BIDNER, T.D. and HERBERT, L.G. (1994) Effect of sodium bentonite or hydrated sodium calcium aluminosilicate on growth performance and tibia mineral. Poultry Science 73 (6): 848-854.Google Scholar
TAUQIR, N.A., SULTAN, J. and NAWAZ, H. (2001) Effect of different levels of bentonite with varying energy levels on the performance of broilers. International Journal Agricultural Biological 3: 85-88.Google Scholar
WESTER, L.E. (2002) Offering sodium bentonite and sodium bicarbonate free choice to lactating dairy cattle. Master of Science Thesis, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, 69p.Google Scholar
WOLTER, R., DUNOYER, C., HENRY, N and SEEGMULLER, S. (1990) Les argiles en alimentation animale: intérêt général. Recherche Médecine Vétérinaire 166: 21-27.Google Scholar
WU, W.H., POWERS, W.J., ANGEL, C.R., HALE, E.C. and APPLEGATET, J. (2007) Effect of an acidifying diet combined with zeolite and slight protein reduction on air emission from laying hens of different ages. Poultry Science 86: 182-190.Google Scholar
WU, X.X., GONG, D.C. and JIN, S.Z. (1999) Research of the curative effects of smectite rich in magnesium on diarrhea in piglet. Journal of Hubei Agricultural College 19: 137-139.Google Scholar
XIA, M.S., HU, C.H. and XU, Z.R. (2004) Effects of copper-bearing montmorillonite on growth performance, digestive enzyme activities, and intestinal microflora and morphology of Male Broilers. Poultry Science 83: 1868-1875.Google Scholar
XIA, M.S., HU, C.H. and XU, Z.R. (2005) Effects of copper bearing montmorillonite on the growth performance, intestinal microflora and morphology of weanling pigs. Animal Feed Science and Technology 118: 307-317.Google Scholar