Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-gb8f7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-24T09:24:29.223Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Coccidiosis in Broilers: the Effective use of Anticoccidial Drugs

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  13 March 2007

W. W. Braunius
W. W. Braunius
Affiliation:
Kromwijkerkade 51, 3442 EJ Woerden, The Netherlands
Get access

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Research Article
Information
World's Poultry Science Journal , Volume 38 , Issue 3 , November 1982 , pp. 176 - 185
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1982

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Anderson, R. M. (1978). The regulation of host population growth by parasitic species. Parasitology, 76: 119.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Barwick, M. W. and Casorso, D. R. (1970). Coccidiostat activity. Down to Earth, 26: 17.Google Scholar
Bennejean, G., Meurier, C., Mevel, H., in collaboration with Morvan, P. and Resonnet, G. (1969). Résistance à divers anticoccidiens acquise par Eimeria acervulina dans certaines conditions de laboratoire. Bulletin Information Station Exérimentale d'Aviculture, Ploufragan 9: 36.Google Scholar
Biggs, P. M., Long, P. L., Kenzy, S. G. and Rootes, D. G. (1968). Relationship between Marek's disease and coccidiosis. Veterinary Record, 83: 284.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Braunius, W. W. (1980). Monitoring the biological performance in broilers, with special regard to subclinical coccidiosis. Archiv für Gelflügelkunde, 44: 183.Google Scholar
Braunius, W. W. Epidemiology of Eimeria in broiler flocks under influence of anticoccidial drugs and the effect on the economic performance. (in press).Google Scholar
Callender, M. E. and Shumard, R. F. (1973). Effect of monensin on development of immunity to coccidia. Poultry Science, 52: 2007.Google Scholar
Chapman, H. D. (1976). Eimeria tenella in chickens: Studies on resistance to the anticoccidial drugs monensin and lasalocid. Veterinary Parasitology, 2: 187.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chapman, H. D. (1978a). Drug resistance in coccidia. In: Avian Coccidiosis, pp. 387–412. Edit. Long, P. L., Boorman, K. N. and Freeman, B. M. British Poultry Science Ltd., Edinburgh.Google Scholar
Chapman, H. D. (1978b). The effect of monensin on the immunity arising from repeated low-level infections with Eimeria maxima, E. brunetti and E. tenella. Avian Pathology, 7: 269.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cuckler, A. C. and Malanga, C. M. (1955). Studies on drug resistance in coccidia. Journal of Parasitology, 41: 302.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cuckler, A. C., McManus, E. C. and Campbell, W. C. (1969). Development of resistance in coccidia. Acta Veterinaria (Brno) 38: 87.Google Scholar
Edgar, S. A. (1970). Coccidiosis: Evaluations of coccidiostats under field conditions; statement of problems. Experimental Parasitology, 28: 90.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Giambrone, J. J., Anderson, W. I., Reid, W. M. and Edison, C. S. (1977). Effect of infections bursal disease on the severity of Eimeria tenella infections in broiler chicks, Poultry Science, 56: 243.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Goldstein, A., Aronow, L. and Kalman, S. M. (1974). Principles of drug action: the basis of pharmacology. II edition, John Wiley and Sons, New York.Google Scholar
Greuel, E., Braunius, W. W. and Kühnhold, W. (1978). Efficacy of some coccidiostats against Eimeria field isolates. Archiv für Geflügelkunde, 42: 16.Google Scholar
Gutteridge, W. E. and Coombs, G. H. (1977). Biochemistry of Parasitic Protozoa. The Macmillan Press Ltd., London and Basingstoke.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Horton Smith, C. (1962). Resistancia hacia drogas anticoccidiodas inducida experimentalmento en un cultivo de laboratorio de Eimeria tenella. Avicultura moderna. Memorias del XI Congreso Mundial de A vicultura, pp. 483.Google Scholar
Jeffers, T. K. (1974). Eimeria acervulina and E. maxima: Incidence and anticoccidial drug resistance of isolates in Major broiler-producing areas. Avian Diseases, 18: 331.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Joyner, L. P. (1978). The identification and diagnosis of avian coccidiosis. In: Avian Coccidiosis, pp. 29–50. Edit. Long, P. L., Boorman, K. L., and Freeman, B. M.Edinburgh, British Poultry Science Ltd.Google Scholar
Joyner, L. P. and Norton, C. C. (1977). The anticoccidial effects of amprolium, dinitolmide and monensin against Eimeria maxima, E. brunetti and E. acervulina with particular reference to oocyst sporulation. Parasitology, 75: 155.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Karlsson, T. and Reid, W. M. (1978). Development of immunity to coccidiosis in chickens administered anticoccidials in feed. Avian Diseases. 22: 487.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Klimes, B. (1969). Resistance development in Eimeria tenella to some coccidiostats (6-aza-uracil, nitrofurazone, zoalene, and amprolium). Acta Veterinaria (Brno), 38: 101.Google Scholar
Kouwenhoven, B. (1970). Eimeria acervulina infectie bij de kip: een parasitologisch en biochemisch onderzock. Thesis— Rijks-universiteit, Utrecht.Google Scholar
Long, P. L., Johnson, J. and Wyatt, R. D. (1980). Eimeria tenella: clinical effects in partially immune and susceptible chickens. Poultry Science, 59: 221.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Macpherson, I. (1978). Coccidiosis in broilers and turkeys. In: Avian coccidiosis, pp. 465–494. Edited by Long, P. L., Boorman, K. N., and Freeman, B. M. British Poultry Science Ltd., Edinburgh.Google Scholar
McDougald, L. R. and McQuistion, T. E. (1980). Compensatory growth in broilers after withdrawal of ionophorous anticoccidial drugs. Poultry Science, 59: 1001.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
McLoughlin, D. K. and Gardiner, J. L. (1962). Drug resistance in Eimeria tenella II. The experimental development of a Zoalene-resistant strain. Journal of Parasitology, 48: 341.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McLoughlin, D. K. and Gardiner, J. L. (1967). Drug resistance in Eimeria tenella. V. The experimental development of a nicarbazin-resistant strain. Journal of parasitology, 53: 930.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
McLoughlin, D. K. and Gardiner, J. L. (1968). Drug resistance in Eimeria tenella VI. The experimental development of an amprolium-resistant strain. Journal of parasitology, 54: 582.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
McLoughlin, D. K. and Chute, M. B. (1973). Efficancy of clopidol against twelve strains of Eimeria tenella, and the development of a clopidol-resistant strain. Avian Diseases, 17: 425.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McManus, E. C., Campbell, W. C. and Cuckler, A. C. (1968). Development of resistance to quinoline coccidiostats under field and laboratory conditions. Journal of Parasitology, 54: 1190.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Migaki, T. T., Chappel, L. R. and Babcock, W. E. (1979). Anticoccidial efficacy of a new polyether antibiotic, salinomycin, in comparison to monensin and lasalocid in battery trials. Poultry Science, 58: 1192.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Norton, C. C. and Joyner, L. P. (1975). The development of drug-resistant strains of Eimeria maxima in the laboratory. Parasitology, 71: 153.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Olson, G., Tamas, T., Smith, D. A., Weppelman, R. M., Schleim, K. and McManus, E. C. (1978). Battery efficacy studies with Arprinocid against field strains of coccidia. Poultry Science, 57: 1245.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Reid, W. M. (1975a). Relative value of oocyst counts in evaluating anticoccidial activity. Avian Diseases 19: 802.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Reid, W. M. (1975b). Progress in the control of coccidiosis with anticoccidials and planned immunization. American Journal of Veterinary Research, 36: 593.Google ScholarPubMed
Reid, W. M., Johnson, J. and Dick, J. (1975). Anticoccidial activity of lasalocid in control of moderate and severe coccidiosis. Avian Diseases, 19: 12.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ryley, J. F. (1980). Recent developments in coccidian biology; where do we go from here? Parasitology, 80: 189.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ryley, J. F. and Betts, M. J. (1973). Chemotheraphy of chicken coccidiosis. In: Advances in pharmacology and Chemotherapy, pp. 221–293. Edit. Garattini, S., Goldin, A., Hawking, F., and Kopin, I. J., New York and London.Google Scholar
Ryley, J. F. and Wilson, R. G. (1975). Laboratory studies with some recent anticoccidials. Parasitology, 70: 203.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ryley, J. F. and Wilson, R. G. (1976). Laboratory studies with some older anticoccidials. Parasitology, 73: 287.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sanda, A. (1977). Development of immunity to coccidiosis caused by Eimeria tenella in one-day old chickens. Acta Veterinaria (Brno), 46: 311.Google Scholar
Siegmann, O. (1966). Serienpassage eines Eimeria tenella—Stammes durch Küken unter der Einwirkung von Amprolium, Glycamid, Nitro-furazon and Dot (Zoalene). Berliner und Münchener Tierärztliche Wochenschrift, 79: 268.Google Scholar
Vahl, H. A. and Stappers, H. P., Voederproeven met enkele nieuwe coccidiostatica. Pluimveehouderij, 10: 18.Google Scholar
Wang, C. C. (1978). Biochemical and nutritional aspects of coccidia, In: Avian Coccidiosis, pp 135–184. Edit. Long, P. L., Boorman, K. N., and Freeman, B. M., Edinburgh, British Poultry Science Ltd.Google Scholar
Williams, R. B. (1969). The persistence of drug resistance in strains of Eimeria species in broiler chickens following a change of coccidiostat. Research in Veterinary Science, 10: 490.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed