Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rdxmf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-26T17:48:24.190Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Artificial insemination in geese

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  17 December 2010

E. ŁUKASZEWICZ
E. ŁUKASZEWICZ*
Affiliation:
Wrocław University of Environmental and Life Sciences, Institute of Animal Breeding, Division of Poultry Breeding, Chelmonskiego 38c, 51-630 Wrocław, Poland
*
Corresponding author: [email protected]
Get access

Abstract

Currently most breeds and lines of geese in use at a commercial scale are derived from two wild species; the swan goose (Anser cygnoides L.) and the true goose-greylag (Anser anser L.). Interestingly, local selections performed for centuries from these two ancestors have resulted in strains or breeds expressing large differences for a range of phenotypic traits including size, body weight, feather colour, behaviour and physiology (including reproductive performance), along with carcass characteristics, flavour and chemical composition of the meat.

When compared with other poultry species, the main factors that have limited geese production and geese meat consumption in Europe are the seasonality of its reproduction and the low fertility of breeder flocks (e.g. egg production, fertility and hatchability rates, low male to female ratio, poor semen quality) associated with, on average, relatively high proportions of lipid tissues in the carcasses of their progeny. Some of the above problems can be eliminated or at least reduced by the application of artificial insemination procedures and by selective breeding on fertility and seasonality.

The present paper reviews the main particularities of artificial insemination techniques developed in the goose with regards to the morphology and physiology of male reproductive organs. The main characteristics of ejaculates along with some morphological aspects of sperm morphology, semen collection procedures and semen quality assessment are also described. Finally, geese insemination procedures along with their interests and limits are discussed.

Keywords

gooseartificial inseminationsemen quality assessment
Type
Review Article
Information
World's Poultry Science Journal , Volume 66 , Issue 4 , December 2010 , pp. 647 - 658
Copyright
Copyright © World's Poultry Science Association 2010

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

BAKST, M.R. (1990) Preservation of avian cells, in: CRAWFORD (Ed.) Poultry Breeding and Genetics, Chapter 4: 91-108.Google Scholar
BEHR, K.P. and HARTMANN, U. (1992) Artificial insemination of geese under field conditions. Proceedings of 9th International Symposium on Waterfowl. Pisa, Italy: 112-114.Google Scholar
BIELINSKI, K. and ROSINSKI, A. (1988) Influence of the age of White Italian geese on their reproductive performance. Proceedings of International Symposium on Waterfowl Production, The Satelite Conference for the XVIII World Poultry Congress, Beijing, China: 223-227.Google Scholar
BLANCO, J.M., GEE, G., WILDT, D.E. and DONOGHUE, A.M. (2000) Species variation in osmotic, cryoprotectant, and cooling rate tolerance in poultry, Eagle, and Peregrine Falcon spermatozoa. Biology of Reproduction 63: 1164-1171.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
BLANCO, J.M., WILDT, D.E., HOFLE, U., VOELKER, W. and DONOGHUE, A.M. (2009) Implementing artificial insemination as an effective tool for ex situ conservation of endangered avian species. Theriogenelogy 71: 200-213.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
BORYS, H., BIELINSKI, K. and STASIAK, K. (1978) Effect of different doses of diluted semen and insemination frequency on fertility of goose eggs. Roczniki Naukowe Zootechniki 5(2): 43-51.Google Scholar
BRILLARD, J.P. (1993) Sperm storage and transport following natural mating and artificial insemination. Poultry Science 72: 923-928.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
BRUN, J-M., DELAUNAY, I., SELLIER, N., ALLETRU, B., ROUVIER, R. and TIXIER-BOICHARD, M. (2003) Analysis of laying traits in first cycle geese in two production systems. Animal Research 52: 125-140.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
BURROWS, W.H. and QUINN, J.P. (1937) The collection of spermatozoa from the domestic fowl and turkey. Poultry Science 16: 19-24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
CHEŁMOŃSKA, B. (1972) Seasonal changes in ganders reproductive organ in artificial insemination aspect. Part I II. Polskie Archiwum Weterynaryjne 15: 575-611.Google Scholar
CHEŁMOŃSKA, B. and ŁUKASZEWICZ, E. (1995) Current state and future of artificial insemination in waterfowl. Proceedings of 10th European Symposium On Waterfowl. Halle, Germany: 225-240.Google Scholar
CHEŁMOŃSKA, B., JERYSZ, A., ŁUKASZEWICZ, E., KOWALCZYK, A. and MALECKI, I. (2008) Semen collection from Japanese Quail (Coturnix japonica) using a teaser female. Turkish Journal of Veterinary and Animal Science 32(1): 19-24.Google Scholar
CHRZANOWSKA, M. and CHEŁMOŃSKA, B. (1997) Investigations on the reciprocal crossbreeding of White Italian and Greylag geese with the use of artificial insemination method. Zeszyty Naukowe Przeglądu Hodowlanego PTZ 31: 185-188.Google Scholar
CRAWFORD, R.D. (1990) Origin and history of poultry species, in: CRAWFORD (Ed.) Poultry Breeding and Genetics, Chapter 1: 1-41.Google Scholar
CSUKA, J. and LEDEC, M. (1984) Development of the reproduction parameters of gander over three years and their correlations. Živočisna Vyroba 29(7): 635-640.Google Scholar
DAVTIAN, A. and PIMENOV, B. (1970) Geese artificial insemination (in Russia). Ptitsevodstvo 11: 29-31.Google Scholar
GRUNDER, A.A. and PAWLUCZUK, B. (1991) Comparison of procedures for collecting semen from ganders and inseminating geese. Poultry Science 70: 1975-1980.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
GUANGXI, L., JIAQI, Z. and SHANSHAN, T. (1988) Researches on using short intervals of lighting to change the seasonal breeding of the Greed of Guangdong geese and increase its reproductivity. Proceedings of International Symposium On Waterfowl Production, The Satelite Conference for the XVIII World Poultry Congress, Beijing, China: 252-255.Google Scholar
JOHNSON, A.S. (1954) Artificial insemination and duration of fertility of geese. Poultry Science 33: 638-640.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
KLIMOWICZ, M., ŁUKASZEWICZ, E. and DUBIEL, A. (2005) Effect of collection frequency on quantitative and qualitative characteristics of pigeon (Columba livia) semen. British Poultry Science 46: 361-365.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
KOWALCZYK, A., CHRZANOWSKA, M., ADAMSKI, M. and ŁUKASZEWICZ, E. (2007a) The effect of crossbreed between Canada Goose (Branta canadensis L.) males and White Kołuda® geese females on slaughter value and carcass tissue composition of progeny. Animal Science 58(1): 70-71.Google Scholar
KOWALCZYK, A., CHRZANOWSKA, M., ŁUKASZEWICZ, E., KORZENIOWSKA, M., BOBAK, and Ł., (2007b) Chemical composition and fatty acid profile of breast and leg muscles of crossbreed hybrids of Canada Goose (Branta canadensis L.) and White Kołuda® geese. Animal Science 58(1): 72-73.Google Scholar
KOWALCZYK, A., ŁUKASZEWICZ, E., WALASIK, K., KORZENIOWSKA, M. and ADAMSKI, M. (2008) Meat quality of hybrids of Canada Goose (Branta canadensis L.) males and White Koluda® goose females. Proceedings of XXXII World's Poultry Congress, Brisbane, Australia.Google Scholar
KURBATOV, A.D., TSARENKO, R.G. and POPOV, I. (1976) Improving of AI in geese. Proceeding of VIII International Congress on Animal Reproduction and AI, Kraków, Poland Vol. IV: 1009-1012.Google Scholar
LIU, S.J., ZHENG, J.X. and YANG, N. (2008) Semen quality factor as an indicator of fertilizing ability for geese. Poultry Science 87: 155-159.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
ŁUKASZEWICZ, E. (2000) Effect of frequency of semen collection from White Italian ganders on quantitative and qualitative traits of semen during entire reproductive cycle. Zeszyty Naukowe Przeglądu Hodowlanego PTZ 49: 447-457.Google Scholar
ŁUKASZEWICZ, E. (2002) Cryoconservation of gander semen. Zesztyty Naukowe Akademii Rolniczej we Wrocławiu 440: 1-111.Google Scholar
ŁUKASZEWICZ, E. and KRUSZYŃSKI, W. (2003) Evaluation of fresh and frozen-thawed gander semen of individual ganders by assessment of spermatozoa motility and morphology. Theriogenology 59: 1627-1640.Google ScholarPubMed
ŁUKASZEWICZ, E., FURUTA, H., XI, Y.M. and FUJIHARA N., (2000) Comparative study on semen quality of one and two-year old ganders during the entire reproductive season. Asian Journal of Andrology 2: 139-142.Google Scholar
MAZANOWSKI, A. and CHEŁMOŃSKA, B. (2000) The effect of reciprocal crossing of White Kołuda and graylag crossbred with Slovakian geese. Annales of Animal Sciences-Roczniki Naukowe Zootechniki 27(4): 85-103.Google Scholar
MAZANOWSKI, A. and SMALEC, E. (1998) Rearing performance of 12-week-old crossbreds geese from genetic reserve flocks compared with White Koluda. Roczniki Naukowe Zootechniki 25(4): 191-205.Google Scholar
MERRITT, E.S. and LEMAY, J.R. (1963) Age and performance of geese. World's Poultry Science Journal 19: 191-193.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
NATIONAL POULTRY COUNCIL-CHAMBER OF COMMERCE, (2009) Results of the evaluation poultry performances in the year 2008. Warsaw, May, 2009.Google Scholar
NITSAN, Z., NIR, I. and DVORIN, A. (1988) Reproductive performance of laying geese kept in flocks or in individual pens. Proceedings of International Symposium On Waterfowl Production, The Satelite Conference for the XVIII World Poultry Congress, Beijing, China: 278-280.Google Scholar
RAUD, M. and FAURE, J.M. (1990) Rhythmic occurrence of sexual behaviour and egg laying activity of Muscovy ducks. British Poultry Science 31: 23-32.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
RENEMA, R.A, RUSTAD, M.E. and ROBINSON, F.E. (2007) Implication of changes to commercial broiler and breeder body weight targets over the past 30 years. World's Poultry Science Journal 63: 457-472.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
ROMANOV, M.N. (1999) Goose production efficiency as influenced by genotype, nutrition and production systems. World's Poultry Science Journal 55: 281-294.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
ROSIŃSKI, A., BIELIŃSKI, K. and BIELIŃSKA K., (1986) The results of geese reproduction in the same flock during subsequent three years. Roczniki Naukowe Zootechniki 13: 127-132.Google Scholar
ROSIŃSKI, A., ROUVIER, R., WĘŻYK, S., SELLIER, N. and BIELIŃSKA, H. (1995) Reproductive performance of geese kept in different management systems. Proceedings of 10th European Symposium On Waterfowl, Halle, Germany: 20-28.Google Scholar
RYBNIK, P.K., HORBAŃCZUK, J.O., NARANOWICZ, H., ŁUKASZEWICZ, E. and MALECKI, I.A. (2007) Semen collection in the ostrich (Struthio camelus) using a dummy or a teaser female. British Poultry Science 48(5): 635-643.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
SAINT JALME, M., LECOQ, R., SEIGNEURIN, F., BLESBOIS, E. and PLOUZEAU, E. (2003) Cryopreservation of semen from endangered pheasants: the first step towards a cryobank for endangered avian species. Theriogenology 59: 875-888.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
SAUVEUR, B., ROUSSELOT-PAILLEY, D. and SELLIER, N. (1988) The effect of dietary energy level on breeding performance of Landaise geese. Proceedings of International Symposium On Waterfowl Production, The Satelite Conference for the XVIII World Poultry Congress, Beijing, China: 228-232.Google Scholar
SELLIER, N., RUSSELOT-PAILLEY, D. and DE REVIES, M. (1995) Artificial Insemination of Geese. INRA Productions Animales 8: 127-133.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
SIUDZIŃSKA, A. and ŁUKASZEWICZ, E. (2008) The effect of breed on freezability of semen of fancy fowl. Animal Science of Reproduction 26(4): 331-340.Google Scholar
STASKO, J., MASAR, T. and SPRONC, A. (1973) The variability and correlations of some ‘Insemination’ properties of ganders. Acta Zootechnica Universty of Agriculture Nitra XXVI: 67-75.Google Scholar
TAI, C. (1984) Duck breeding and artificial insemination in Taiwan, in: FARRELL, D.J. & STAPLETON, P. (Eds) Duck production science and world practice, pp. 193-203 (University of New England).Google Scholar
TOTH, S., BUCZOLICS, E. and SOAD SAAD EL-DIN, (1988) Investigations of sperm production of ganders during successive production periods. Bulletin of University Agricultural Sciences, Godollo, Hungary 1: 65-69.Google Scholar
TSARENKO, R.G., KURBATOV, A.D. and MAVRODINA, T.G. (1979) Effect of very low temperatures on the storage, characters of semen from individual ganders. Bulletin VNIRGJ 40: 35-39.Google Scholar
WILLIN, E.S. and KOVATS, E. (2000) Investigation of the reproductive performances of Gray Landes geese kept in semi-intensive management system. Proceedings of XXI World Poultry Congress, Montreal, Canada.Google Scholar