¹ Among the most prominent comparative studies on the status of women are Biele, Janet Zoliinger and Smock, Audrey Chapman, eds., Women: Roles and Status in Eight Countries (New York: John Wiley, 1977)Google Scholar; Schlegel, Alice, ed., Sexual Stratification: A Cross-Cultural View (New York: Columbia University Press, 1977)Google Scholar; Iglitzin, Lynne B. and Ross, Ruth, eds., Women in the World (Santa Barbara, Calif.: Clio Books, 1976)Google Scholar; Lindsay, Beverly, Comparative Perspectives of Third World Women: The Impact of Race, Sex, and Class (New York: Praeger, 1980)Google Scholar; and Blumberg, Rae Lesser, Stratification: Socio-Economic and Sexual Stratification (Dubuque, Iowa: William C. Brown, 1978).Google Scholar

² See Sutton, F. X., “The Pattern Variables,” in Eckstein, Harry and Apter, David, eds., Comparative Politics: A Reader (New York: Free Press, 1963)Google Scholar; McClelland, David, “The Achievement Motive in Economic Growth,” in Hoselitz, Bert and Moore, Wilbert E., eds., Industrialization and Society (The Hague: Mouton, 1963), 74–96.Google Scholar

³ Rosen, Bernard and LaRaia, Anita, “Modernity in Women: An Index of Social Change in Brazil,” Journal of Marriage and the Family, XXXIV (May 1972), 354.Google Scholar

⁴ See Tinker, Irene and Bramsen, Michele Bo, eds., Women and World Development (Washington, D.C.: Overseas Development Council, 1976)Google Scholar; Lewis, Barbara, ed., Invisible Farmers: Women and the Crisis in Agriculture (Washington, D.C.: Women in Development Office, Agency for International Development, 1981)Google Scholar; Arizpe, Lourdes, “Women in the Informal Labor Sector: The Case of Mexico City,” SIGNS, III (Autumn 1977), 25–37CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Staudt, Kathleen, “Agricultural Productivity Gaps: A Case Study of Male Preference in Policy Implementation,” Development and Change, IX (July 1978), 439–58CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Dauber, Roslyn and Cain, Melinda, eds., Women and Technological Change in Developing Countries (Boulder, Colo.: Westview Press, 1981)Google Scholar; Buvinic, Mayra and others, eds., Women's Issues in Third World Poverty (Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University Press, forthcoming)Google Scholar; Dixon, Ruth, Rural Women at Work: Strategies for Development in South Asia (Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University Press, 1978).Google Scholar

⁵ Buvinic, Mayra, Youssef, Nadia H., and Elm, Barbara Von, “Women-Headed House holds: The Ignored Factor in Development Planning,” mimeo (Washington, D.C.: International Center for Research on Women, 1978).Google Scholar

⁶ Youssef, Nadia H. and Buvinic, Mayra, “The Productivity of Women in Developing Countries: Measurement Issues and Recommendations” (Washington, D.C.: International Center for Research on Women, 1980).Google Scholar

⁷ The discussion of Marxism is drawn from Leahy, Margaret E., “Equality and Inequality in Capitalist and Socialist Societies: A Conceptual Framework for Comparative Studies of Women and National Development,” paper presented at the International Political Science Association Meetings (Moscow, 1979)Google Scholar; Chinchilla, Norma, “Ideologies of Feminism: Liberal, Radical, Marxist,” paper presented at a symposiumon Women in the Americas (Tijuana, Mexico, April 1978)Google Scholar; and Sacks, Karen, “Engels Revisited: Women, the Organization of Production, and Private Property,” in Reiter, Rayna R., ed., Toward an Anthropology of Women (New York: Monthly Review Press, 1975), 211–34.Google Scholar

⁸ Madeira, Felicia and Singer, Paul, “Structure of Female Employment and Work in Brazil,” Journal of Inter-American Studies and World Affairs, XVII (November 1975), 490–97CrossRefGoogle Scholar

⁹ See discussion in Navarro, Marysa, “Research on Latin American Women,” SIGNS, v (Autumn 1979), 111–21CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Nash, June, “A Critique of Social Science Roles in Latin America,” in Nash, June and Safa, Helen, eds., Sex and Class in Latin America (New York: Praeger, 1976), 1–24.Google Scholar

¹⁰ Lim, Linda, Women Workers in Multinational Corporations, Ann Arbor, Mich.: Occasional Papers in Women's Studies, No. 9 (Fall, 1978)Google Scholar; Fernandez-Kelly, Patricia, “The ‘Maquila’ Women,” NACLA Report on the Americas, XIV (September/October 1980), 14–19.Google Scholar

¹¹ Chinchilla, Norma, “Mobilizing Women: Revolution in the Revolution,” Latin American Perspectives, IV (Fall 1977), 96.Google Scholar

¹² Leahy (fn. 7), 11.

¹³ Larguía, Isabel and Demoulin, John, “Aspects of the Conditions of Women's Labor,” Latin America and Empire Report, IX (September 1975), 4.Google Scholar

¹⁴ Maillassoux, Claude, Mujeres, graneros y capitales (Mexico: Siglo XXI Press, 1977), 196Google Scholar; author's translation.

¹⁵ Sanday, , “Female Status in the Public Domain,” in Rosaldo, Michele Z. and Lamphere, Louise, eds., Women, Culture, and Society (Stanford, Calif.: Stanford University Press, 1974), 189–206.Google Scholar

¹⁶ See Firestone, , The Dialectic of Sex: The Case for Feminist Revolution (New York: Bantam Books, 1970), 11.Google Scholar

¹⁷ Gimenez, Martha, “Population and Capitalism,” Latin American Perspectives, IV (Fall 1977), 33.Google Scholar

¹⁸ Sacks (fn. 7), 213.

¹⁹ Leacock, , “Women's Status in Egalitarian Society: Implications for Social Evolution,” Current Anthropology, IX (June 1978), 247–75, at 250.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

²⁰ Rubin, , “The Traffic in Women: Notes on the 'Political Economy' of Sex,” in Reiter (fn. 7), 157–210, at 174.Google Scholar

²¹ ibid., 178.

²² Chodorow, , The Reproduction of Mothering (Berkeley: University of California Press, 1978).Google Scholar

²³ Rubin (fn. 20), 198.

²⁴ For the general case and a feminist analogue, see Boals, Kay, “The Politics of Cultural Liberation,” in Jaquette, Jane S., ed., Women in Politics (New York: John Wiley, 1974), 322–42.Google Scholar

²⁵ Rosaldo and Lamphere (fn. 15).

²⁶ Rogers, , “Female Forms of Power and the Myth of Male Dominance: A Model of Female-Male Interaction in a Peasant Society,” American Ethnologist, 11 (November 1975), 729.Google Scholar

²⁷ See Youssef and Buvinic (fn. 6) ; Julie DaVanzo and Donald Lye Poh Lee, “The Compatibility of Child Care with Labor Force Participation and Nonmarket Activities,” P-6126, Santa Monica, Calif.: The Rand Corporation (July 1978); Lomnitz, Larissa, Networks and Marginalny (New York: Academic Press, 1977)Google Scholar; Chinas, Beverly, The Isthmus Zapotees: Women's Roles in a Cultural Context (New York: Holt, Rhinchart & Winston, 1973)Google Scholar; Constantina Safilios Rothschild, “A Macro- and Micro-Examination of Family Power and Love,” Journal of Marriage and the Family, XXXVIII (May 1976), 355–62.Google Scholar

²⁸ Huntington, , “Issues in Woman's Role in Economic Development: Critique and Alternatives,” Journal of Marriage and the Family, XXXVII (November 1975), 1008.Google Scholar

²⁹ Bourque, and Warren, , “Female Participation, Perception and Power: An Examination of Two Andean Communities,” in Booth, John and Seligson, Mitchell, eds., Political Participation and the Poor (New York: Holmes & Meier, 1979), 132.Google Scholar

³⁰ Rosaldo, Michelle Z., “The Use and Abuse of Anthropology: Reflections on Feminism and Cross-Cultural Understanding,” SIGNS, v (Spring 1980), 409.Google Scholar

³¹ The analogy is with Scott's, James C. thesis in The Moral Economy of the Peasant: Rebellion and Subsistence in Southeast Asia (New Haven: Yale University Press, 1976).Google Scholar This view of women's stake in the existing distribution of power explains why women do not revolt, but not why they do. See Bates, Robert, “People in Villages: Micro-level Studies in Political Economy,” World Politics, XXXI (October 1978), 129–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar