Published online by Cambridge University Press: 13 June 2011
In his book The War Trap Bruce Bueno de Mesquita claims to offer a deductive theory of international conflict based on the assumption that foreign policy makers attempt to maximize their expected utility. The theory is subjected to a systematic empirical test that seems to provide impressive confirmation. The first part of this article examines Bueno de Mesquita's theory and argues that it cannot be derived from his assumptions. The second part examines the operational version of the theory, which was the one actually tested, and argues that it can be more plausibly interpreted as a version of a different theory—one that Bueno de Mesquita claims to have discredited. The essay concludes by discussing the significance of this book with regard to the question of whether theories of individual rational choice can explain foreign policy decisions.
1 There are also serious problems in interpreting the way in which these possible future changes in values are incorporated in i's expected-utility calculations, but I will omit discussion of them since the difficulties with the main part of the analysis are already fundamental.
2 Altfeld, Michael and Mesquita, Bruce Bueno de, “Choosing Sides in Wars,” International Studies Quarterly 23 (March 1979), 87–112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
3 I assume that when the author reports E(U i =.000 and E(U i,) = −.000, he means that they are very small numbers (one positive and one negative) that round off to zero. This is true of 10 cases.