¹ See Kaufman, Robert and others, “A Preliminary Test of the Theory of Dependency,” Comparative Politics, VII (April 1975)Google Scholar; Ray, David, “The Dependency Model and Latin America: Three Basic Fallacies,” Journal of Interamerican Affairs and World Studies, XV (February 1973)Google Scholar; McGowan, Patrick J., “Economic Dependency and Economic Performance in Black Africa,” Journal of Modern African Studies, XIV (No. 1, 1976)Google Scholar; Berg, Elliot J., “Structural Transformation versus Gradualism: Recent Economic Development in Ghana and the Ivory Coast,” in Foster, Philip and Zolberg, Aristide R., Ghana and the Ivory Coast: Perspectives on Modernization (Berkeley: University of California Press 1971)Google Scholar; and McGowan, Patrick J. and Smith, Dale L., “Economic Dependency in Black Africa: An Analysis of Competing Theories,” International Organization, XXXII (Winter 1978).Google Scholar

² Cardoso, Fernando Henrique, “Associated-Dependent Development: Theoretical and Practical Implications,” in Stepan, Alfred, ed., Authoritarian Brazil: Origins, Policies and Future (New Haven: Yale University Press 1973)Google Scholar, and Cardoso, , “Dependent Capitalist Development in Latin America,” New Left Review, Vol. 74 (July-August 1972).Google Scholar

³ While the local economies as well as the international system are seen to change over time, in these analyses the dominant partner and therefore the shaper of the over all movement is always the world economy. The subordinate member develops as a “reflection” (Theotonio Dos Santos) or with a “reflex reaction” (Dieter Senghass) to these forces which it can neither escape nor control. Among others, see Santos, Theotonio Dos, “The Structure of Dependence,” American Economic Review, Vol. 60, (May 1970)Google Scholar; Senghass, Dieter, “Introduction” to a special number called “Overcoming Underdevelopment,” Journal of Peace Research, XII (No. 4, 1975)Google Scholar; Bodenheimer, Susanne, “Dependency and Imperialism: The Roots of Latin American Underdevelopment,” in Fann, K. T. and Hodges, Donald C., eds., Readings in U. S. Imperialism (Boston: Porter Sargent 1971).Google Scholar

⁴ Immanuel Wallerstein does not foresee the end of the system for another century or two. See “Dependence in an Interdependent World: The Limited Possibilities of Transformation within the Capitalist World Order,” African Studies Review, XVII (April 1974), 2.

⁵ Amin, Samir, Accumulation on a World Scale: A Critique of the Theory of Underdevelopment, 1 (New York: Monthly Review Press 1974), 3.Google Scholar

⁶ Frank, André Gunder, “The Development of Underdevelopment,” in Cockcroft, James D. and others, Dependence and Underdevelopment: Latin America's Political Economy (New York: Anchor Books 1972), 9.Google Scholar

⁷ Rodney, Walter, How Europe Underdeveloped Africa (London: Bogle-l'Ouverture 1973), 21–22Google Scholar; emphasis in original.

⁸ Moulder, Frances V., Japan, China, and the Modern World-Economy: Toward a Reinterpretation of East Asian Development (New York: Cambridge University Press 1977), vii–viii.Google Scholar

⁹ Stein, Stanley J. and Stein, Barbara H., The Colonial Heritage of Latin America: Essays on Economic Dependency in Perspective (New York: Oxford University Press 1970), viii.Google Scholar

¹⁰ Grunwald, Kurt and Ronall, Joachim O., Industrialization in the Middle East (New York: Council for Middle Eastern Affairs Press 1960), 331.Google Scholar

¹¹ Wallerstein's first book in a four-volume series has been published under the instructive title The Modern World System: Capitalist Agriculture and the Origins of the European World-Economy in the Sixteenth Century (New York: Academic Press 1974).

¹² Lukacs, Georg, “Rosa Luxembourg, Marxiste,” in Histoire et conscience de classe (Paris: Editions de Minuit 1960), 47–48.Google Scholar

¹³ Wallerstein, , “The Rise and Future Demise of the World Capitalist System,” Comparative Studies in Society and History, XVI (September 1974), 390.Google Scholar

¹⁴ Baran, Paul, The Political Economy of Growth (2d ed.; New York: Monthly Review Press 1962), 149.Google Scholar

¹⁵ Ibid., 150.

¹⁶ Morris, Morris D., “Towards a Reinterpretation of Nineteenth-Century Indian Economic History,” Indian Economic and Social History Review, V (March 1968), 6–7.Google Scholar

¹⁷ See Moore, Barrington Jr, Social Origins of Dictatorship and Democracy: Lord and Peasant in the Making of the Modern World (Boston: Beacon Press 1966)Google Scholar, chap. 6; Maddison, Angus, Class Structure and Economic Growth: India and Pakistan since the Moghuls (London: Allen and Unwin 1971)Google Scholar; Morris, (fn. 16), and “Trends and Tendencies in Indian Economic History,” Indian Economic and Social History Review, V (December 1968).Google Scholar

¹⁸ Dutt, Romesh, The Economic History of India: In the Victorian Age, 1837–1900 (2d ed.; Delhi: Ministry of Information and Broadcasting, Government of India 1970)Google Scholar, Book II, chap. 12, and Book III, chap. 9; Buchanan, Daniel Houston, The Development of Capitalistic Enterprise in India (New York: Macmillan 1934), 465–67.Google Scholar

¹⁹ Moore, (fn. 17), 354–55.Google Scholar

²⁰ Baran, (fn. 14), 158.Google Scholar

²¹ Frank, André Gunder, “Sociology of Underdevelopment and Underdevelopment of Sociology,” in Cockcroft (fn. 6)Google Scholar; Bodenheimer, Susanne J., The Ideology of Developmentalism: The American-ParadigmSurrogate for Latin American Studies (Beverly Hills, Calif.: Sage Professional Papers in Comparative Politics 1971).Google Scholar

²² Frank, André Gunder, “The Development of Underdevelopment,” and “Economic Dependence, Class Structure, and Underdevelopment Policy,” in Cockcroft (fn. 6)Google Scholar; Wallerstein (fn. 13). For criticism of Frank's view, see Laclau, Ernesto, “Imperialism in Latin America,” New Left Review, Vol. 67 (May-June 1971)Google Scholar; Brown, Michael Barratt, The Economics of Imperialism (New York: Penguin Books 1974)Google Scholar, chap. II.

²³ Leys, Colin, Underdevelopment in Kenya: The Political Economy of Neo-Colonialism, 1964–1971 (Berkeley: University of California Press 1974), 198–99.Google Scholar

²⁴ Baran, (fn. 14), XXXVI.Google Scholar

²⁵ Sartre, , Critique de la raison dialectique (Paris: Gallimard 1960), 44.Google Scholar For a criticism of Sartre on precisely the grounds that he also rides roughshod over the individual case on occasion, see Smith, Tony, “Idealism and People's War: Sartre on Algeria,” Political Theory, I (November 1973).Google Scholar

²⁶ See Smith, Tony, “A Comparative Study of French and British Decolonization,” Comparative Studies in Society and History, XX (January 1978).Google Scholar

²⁷ Nkrumah, Kwame, Neo-Colonialism: The Last State of Imperialism (New York: International Publishers 1966), ix.Google Scholar

²⁸ Fanon, Frantz, The Wretched of the Earth (New York: Grove Press 1966), 122.Google Scholar

²⁹ Wallerstein, (fn. II), 355.Google Scholar

³⁰ Ibid., 15–16.

³¹ Wallerstein (fn. 13), 412, 415; Wallerstein, “Class Formation in the Capitalist World-Economy,” Politics and Society, v (No. 3, 1975), 375.Google Scholar

³² Skocpol, Theda, “Wallerstein's World Capitalist System: A Theoretical and Historical Critique,” American Journal of Sociology, Vol. 82 (March 1977), 1083ff.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

³³ Gerschenkron, Alexander, “Economic Backwardness in Historical Perspective,” in Economic Backwardness in Historical Perspective (Cambridge: Harvard University Press 1963).Google Scholar

³⁴ Schmitter, , “Still the Century of Corporatism?” Review of Politics, XXXVI (January 1974), 108.Google Scholar Also see fn. 35.

³⁵ See Kaufman, , “Mexico and Latin American Authoritarianism,” in Reyna, José Luis and Weinert, Richard S., eds., Authoritarianism in Mexico (Philadelphia: Institute for the Study of Human Issues 1977), 195Google Scholar, and the chart derived from O'Donnell, 197. Nevertheless, neither Kaufman nor Schmitter should be classified as dependency the orists: see Kaufman (fn. I), and Schmitter, , “Desarrollo retrasado, dependencia externa y cambio politico en America Latina,” Foro International, XII (December 1971).Google Scholar

³⁶ O'Donnell, Guillermo, “Corporatism and the Question of the State,” in Malloy, James M. ed., Authoritarianism and Corporatism in Latin America (Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press 1977), 54.Google Scholar For similar observations in the same volume, see Silvio Duncan Baretta and Helen E. Douglass, “Authoritarianism and Corporatism in Latin America: A Review Essay.”

³⁷ Meyer, , “Historical Roots of the Authoritarian State in Mexico,” in Reyna and Weinert (fn. 35).Google Scholar Meyer speaks of Diaz's “inability to transform an authoritarian situation into an authoritarian system” and states that “the Mexican Revolution did not destroy the authoritarian nature of Mexican political life, it modernized it” (pp. 9, 4); Hansen, Roger, The Politics of Mexican Development (Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins Press 1971), 149.Google Scholar

³⁸ Dike, Kenneth Onwuka, Trade and Politics in the Niger Delta, 1830–1885 (New York: Oxford University Press 1956)Google Scholar; Newbury, C. W. and Kanya-Forstner, A. S., “French Policy and the Origins of the Scramble for West Africa,” Journal of African History, X (No. 2, 1969)Google Scholar; Hopkins, A. G., An Economic History of West Africa (London: Longman 1973)Google Scholar, chap. 4.

³⁹ Pailey, Frank Edgar, British Policy and the Turkish Reform Movement: A Study in Anglo-Turkish Relations, 1826–1853 (New York: Howard Festig 1970)Google Scholar; Hershlag, Z. Y., Introduction to the Modern Economic History of the Middle East (Leiden: E. J. Brill 1964)Google Scholar; Issawi, Charles, ed., The Economic History of the Middle East, 1800–1914 (Chicago: University of Chicago Press 1966)Google Scholar; Shaw, Stanford J., “The Nineteenth-Century Ottoman Tax Reforms and Revenue System,” International Journal of Middle East Studies, VI (October 1975)Google Scholar; Clark, Edward C., “The Ottoman Industrial Revolution,” International Journal of Middle East Studies, V (January 1974)Google Scholar; Z. Y.

Hershlag, , Turkey: The Challenge of Growth (Leiden: E. J. Brill 1968)Google Scholar; Trimberger, Ellen Kay, Revolution from Above: Military Bureaucrats and Developments in Japan, Turkey, Egypt, and-Peru (Edison, N.J.: Transaction Books 1977).Google Scholar

⁴⁰ Issawi, Charles, Egypt in Revolution: An Economic Analysis (New York: Oxford University Press 1963)Google Scholar, chaps. 1 and 2; Crouchley, A. E., The Economic Development of Modern Egypt (London: Longmans, Green 1938)Google Scholar, chap. 2; Encyclopaedia Britannica, IIth ed., XVIII, s.v. “Mehemet Ali.” The figures for industrial workers may be found by comparing Hershlag, Introduction…(fn. 39), 86, with Issawi, 43.

⁴¹ Owen, E.R.J., “Lord Cromer and the Development of Egyptian Industry, 1883–1907,” Middle Eastern Studies, II (July 1966).Google Scholar

⁴² Tignor, Robert L., “Bank Misr and Foreign Capitalism,” International journal of Middle East Studies, VII (April 1977)Google Scholar; Issawi, Charles, “Shifts in Economic Power,” in Issawi (fn. 39), 505ff.Google Scholar

⁴³ Moore (fn. 17), chap. 5; Trimberger (fn. 39); Maddison, Angus, Economic Growth in Japan and the USSR (London: George Allen & Unwin 1969)Google Scholar; Allen, G. C., A Short Economic History of Modern Japan: 1867–1937 (New York: Praeger 1962)Google Scholar; Rosovsky, Henry, “Japan's Transition to Modern Economic Growth, 1868–1885,” in Rosovsky, , ed., Industrialization in Two Systems: Essays in Honor of Alexander Gerschenkron (New York: Wiley 1966).Google Scholar

⁴⁴ Gallagher, John and Robinson, Ronald, Africa and the Victorians: The Climax of Imperialism (New York: Doubleday 1968), 3–4.Google Scholar

⁴⁵ Platt, D. C. M., Latin America and British Trade, 1806–1914 (New York: Harper & Row 1973).Google Scholar

⁴⁶ Graham, , Britain and the Onset of Modernization in Brazil, 1850–1914 (New York: Cambridge University Press 1968), 27–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

⁴⁷ Platt, (fn. 45), 78Google Scholar, 84.

⁴⁸ On Egypt, see Owen (fn. 41); on India, see Dutt (fn. 18), Book II, chap. 12, and Book III, chap. 9.

⁴⁹ Diaz Alejandro, Carlos F., Essays on the Economic History of the Argentine Republic (New Haven: Yale University Press 1970), 138Google Scholar; for his comparisons with Canada and Australia, see 110–14.

⁵⁰ Villarreal, , “The Policy of Import-Substitution Industrialization, 1929–1975,” in Reyna and Weinert (fn. 35).Google Scholar

⁵¹ Burns, , Latin America: A Concise Interpretive History (Englewood Cliffs, N. J.: Prentice-Hall 1972), 130–31.Google Scholar

⁵² Díaz, (fn. 49), 2Google Scholar, 11. For a similar argument on Brazil, see Peláez, Carlos Manuel, ”The Theory and Reality of Imperialism in the Coffee Economy of Nineteenth-Century Brazil,” Economic History Review, XXIX (May 1976).Google Scholar

⁵³ For trade figures, see Hobsbawm, E. J., Industry and Empire (London: Pelican 1969), 139Google Scholar, and Forbes Munro, J., Africa and the International Economy, 1800–1960 (London: Rowman and Littlefield 1976). 40Google Scholar; for investment figures, see Barrett-Brown, Michael, After Imperialism (New York: Humanities Press 1970), 93.Google Scholar

⁵⁴ Skocpol, Theda, “France, Russia, China: A Structural Theory of Social Revolution,” Comparative Studies in Society and History, XVIII (No. 2, 1976), 185.Google Scholar

⁵⁵ Trimberger (fn. 39); Trimberger, and Horowitz, Irving Louis, “State Power and Military Nationalism in Latin America,” Comparative Politics, VIII (January 1976).Google Scholar

⁵⁶ Warren, , “Imperialism and Capitalist Industrialization,” New Left Review, Vol. 81 (September-October 1973), 42–43.Google Scholar

⁵⁷ Gerschenkron, , Europe in the Russian Mirror: Four Lectures in Economic History (New York: Cambridge University Press 1970), 99, 102–3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar See also Cameron, Rondo, ed., Banking and Economic Development: Some Lessons of History (New York: Oxford University Press 1972).Google Scholar

⁵⁸ Moore, (fn. 17), 113–14.Google Scholar See also Collier, David, “Timing of Economic Growths and Regime Characteristics in Latin America,” Comparative Politics, VII (April 1975);Google ScholarGourevitch, Peter A., “The Second Image Reversed: The International Sources of Domestic Politics,” paper for the American Political Science Association, Annual Meeting 1977.Google Scholar

⁵⁹ Hirsthman, , “The Political Economy of Import-Substituting Industrializing in Latin America,” in A Bias for Hope: Essays on Development and Latin America (New Haven: Yale University Press 1971).Google Scholar

⁶⁰ Huntington, Samuel P., Political Order in Changing Societies (New Haven: Yale University Press 1968)Google Scholar; Riggs, Fred W., Administrative Reform and Political Responsiveness (Beverly Hills, Calif.: Sage 1970).Google Scholar

⁶¹ Peemans, J. P., “The Social and Economic Development of Zaire since Independence,” African Affairs, Vol. 74 (April 1975), 102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

⁶² Smith, Tony, “The Political and Economic Ambitions of Algerian Land Reform, 1962–1974,” Middle East journal, XXIX (Summer 1975).Google Scholar

⁶³ Huntington (fn. 60), chap. 2.

⁶⁴ Liska, , Imperial America: The International Politics of Primacy (Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins Press 1967)Google Scholar, Preface (unpaginated), and 180.

⁶⁵ United Nations, Monthly Bulletin of Statistics, June 1976.Google Scholar

⁶⁶ United Nations, Monthly Bulletin of Statistics, August 1977.Google Scholar

⁶⁷ For a fuller discussion, see Smith, Tony, “Changing Configurations of Power in North-South Relations since 1945,” International Organization, XXXI (Winter 1977).Google Scholar

⁶⁸ Glade, , “Revolution and Economic Development: A Mexican Reprise,” in Glade, William and Anderson, Charles W., eds., The Political Economy of Mexico (Madison: University of Wisconsin Press 1963).Google Scholar

⁶⁹ Smith, (fn. 67), 21ff.Google Scholar

⁷⁰ Johnson, , “Dependence and the International System,” in Cockroft (fn. 6), 75nGoogle Scholar; repeated with other dates, 94n.

⁷¹ See Department of Commerce, Survey of Current Business, “U. S. Direct Investment Abroad in 1976” (August 1977)Google Scholar, for all figures except those on sales; for sales, see ibid., “Sales by Majority-Owned Foreign Affiliates of U. S. Companies, 1974” (May 1976). Other years could be cited where American profits were far less.

⁷² Department of Commerce, Survey of Current Business, “Sources and Uses of Funds for a Sample of Majority-Owned Foreign Affiliates of U. S. Companies, 1966–1972” (July 1975).Google Scholar

⁷³ Barnet, and Miiller, , Global Reach: The Power of the Multinational Corporations (New York: Simon and Schuster 1974), 154–55.Google Scholar

⁷⁴ Vaupel, James W. and Curhan, Joan P., The Making of Multinational Enterprise (Cambridge: Graduate School of Business Administration, Harvard University 1969), 240–41Google Scholar for expansion; 376–77, 505 for losses.

⁷⁵ Department of Commerce, Survey of Current Business, “U. S. Direct Investment Abroad in 1976” (August 1977), Table 4, p. 35 and Table 5, pp. 36–37.

⁷⁶ For a particularly strong essay stressing the growing role of the South relative to the North, see Moran, Theodore H., “Multinational Corporations and Dependency: A Dialogue for Dependentistas and Non-Dependentistas,” International Organization, XXXII (Winter 1978)Google Scholar; on Nigeria, see editorial notes in African Development, X (December 1975); on Mexico, Weinert, Richard, “The State and Foreign Capital,” in Reyna and Weinert (fn. 35)Google Scholar; and on Southeast Asia, Weinstein, Franklin, “Multinational Corporations and the Third World: The Case of Japan and Southeast Asia,” International Organization, XXX (Summer 1976).Google Scholar

⁷⁷ World Bank, Annual Report (1977), Table 5, p. IIIGoogle Scholar; Department of Commerce, Overseas Business Report, “World Trade Outlook for Near East and North Africa,” OBR 77–45 (September 1977); Department of State, Foreign Economic Trends and their Implications for the U. S., “Algeria,” 77–033 (March 1977).

⁷⁸ Galtung, Johan, “The Lomé Convention and Neo-Capitalism,” African Review, VI (No. I, 1976).Google Scholar