Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-ndw9j Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-09T06:22:05.583Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Social Change, Bureaucratic Rule, and Emergent Political Issues in Hong Kong

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  13 June 2011

Lau Siu-Kai
Lau Siu-Kai
Affiliation:
Sociology at The Chinese University of Hong Kong
Get access

Abstract

Hong Kong's postwar economic “miracle” has been sustained by a minimally integrated social-political system, the two constituent parts of which are a laissez-faire bureaucracy and a “self-sufficient,” atomistic Chinese society. Until recently, this system has operated to keep politically salient issues to a manageable minimum. Secular, asymmetrical changes, however, have opened up cracks in the system; their disruptive effects have become increasingly visible. Because of its overly rapid economic growth, the organizational fabric of the Chinese society has worn away, making it more dependent on the government for need satisfaction. Together with the administrative imperatives befitting a complex industrial society, this dependence furthers the emergence of a professionalized and expanded bureaucracy. The problem of linkage between the government and the Chinese society is aggravated by the inadequacy of existing intermediary devices. As a result, a new style of politics is emerging in Hong Kong, reflecting its troubled structural conditions.

Type
Research Article
Information
World Politics , Volume 35 , Issue 4 , July 1983 , pp. 544 - 562
Copyright
Copyright © Trustees of Princeton University 1983

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 See Siu-kai, Lau, “Utilitarianistic Familism: The Basis of Political Stability in Hong Kong,” in King, Ambrose Y.C. and Lee, Ranee P.L., eds., Social Life and Development in Hong Kong (Hong Kong: Chinese University Press, 1981), 195–216Google Scholar, and Society and Politics in Hong Kong (Hong Kong: Chinese University Press, 1982).

2 Siu-kai, Lau, “Chinese Familism in an Urban-Industrial Setting: The Case of Hong Kong,” Journal of Marriage and the Family 43 (November 1981), 977–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

3 Siu-kai, Lau and Kam-fai, Ho, “Social Accommodation of Politics: The Case of the Young Hong Kong Workers,” Journal of Commonwealth and Comparative Politics 20 (July 1982), 172–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

4 Ibid.

5 Siu-kai, Lau, “The Government, Intermediate Organizations, and Grass-roots Politics in Hong Kong,” Asian Survey 21 (August 1981), 865–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

6 Cheng, Joseph Y.S., “Goals of Government Expenditure in a Laissez-faire Political Economy: Hong Kong in the 1970s,” Asian Survey 19 (July 1979), 695–706.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

7 Lipsky, Michael, “Toward a Theory of Street-level Bureaucracy,” in Hawley, Willis D. and Lipsky, Michael, eds., Theoretical Perspectives on Urban Politics (Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice-Hall, 1976), 196–213.Google Scholar

8 Yates, Douglas, The Ungovernable City: The Politics of Urban Problems and Policy Making (Cambridge: MIT Press, 1978), 22.Google Scholar

9 Siu-kai, Lau, “Local Administrative Reform in Hong Kong: Promises and Limitations,” Asian Survey 22 (September 1982), 858–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar