Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-2brh9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T23:09:02.178Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Public Opinion on Geopolitics and Trade

Theory and Evidence

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 April 2022

Allison Carnegie*
Affiliation:
Department of Political Science, Columbia University, New York, New York, USA
Nikhar Gaikwad
Affiliation:
Department of Political Science, Columbia University, New York, New York, USA
*
*Corresponding author. E-mail: [email protected]
Get access

Abstract

This article provides a systematic examination of the role of security considerations in shaping mass preferences over international economic exchange. The authors employ multiple survey experiments conducted in the United States and India, along with observational and case study evidence, to investigate how geopolitics affects voters’ views of international trade. Their research shows that respondents consistently—and by large margins—prefer trading with allies over adversaries. Negative prior beliefs about adversaries, amplified by concerns that trade will bolster the partner's military, account for this preference. Yet the authors also find that a significant proportion of the public believes that trade can lead to peace and that the peace-inducing aspects of trade can cause voters to overcome their aversion to trade with adversaries. This article helps explain when and why governments constrained by public opinion pursue economic cooperation in the shadow of conflict.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © 2022 Trustees of Princeton University

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Achen, Christopher H., and Bartels, Larry M.. 2016. Democracy for Realists: Why Elections Do Not Produce Responsive Government. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bailey, Michael. 2001. “Quiet Influence: The Representation of Diffuse Interests on Trade Policy, 1983–94.” Legislative Studies Quarterly 26, no. 1: 4580. At https://www.jstor.org/stable/440403.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bailey, Michael A. 2003. “The Politics of the Difficult: Congress, Public Opinion, and Early Cold War Aid and Trade Policies.” Legislative Studies Quarterly 28, no. 2: 147–77. At https://www.jstor.org/stable/3598648.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baum, Matthew A., and Potter, Philip B. K.. 2015. War and Democratic Constraint: How the Public Influences Foreign Policy. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Berinsky, Adam J., Huber, Gregory A., and Lenz, Gabriel S.. 2012. “Evaluating Online Labor Markets for Experimental Research: Amazon.com's Mechanical Turk.” Political Analysis 20, no. 3: 351–68. At https://doi.org/10.1093/pan/mpr057.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beschloss, Michael R. 2002. The Conquerors: Roosevelt, Truman and the Destruction of Hitler's Germany, 1941–1945. New York, N.Y.: Simon & Schuster.Google Scholar
Blackwill, Robert D., and Harris, Jennifer M.. 2016. War by Other Means: Geoeconomics and Statecraft. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carnegie, Allison, and Gaikwad, Nikhar. 2022. “Replication files for: Public Opinion on Geopolitics and Trade: Theory and Evidence.” Harvard Dataverse, V1. At https://doi.org/10.7910/DVN/4DE06H.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carter, Ash. 2015. “Remarks on the Next Phase of the US Rebalance to the Asia-Pacific.” Secretary of Defense Speech, McCain Institute, Arizona State University, Tempe, Ariz. At https://bit.ly/39OUryK, accessed December 29, 2021.Google Scholar
Casey, Steven. 2001. Cautious Crusade: Franklin D. Roosevelt, American Public Opinion, and the War against Nazi Germany. New York, N.Y.: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Chen, Frederick R., Pevehouse, Jon C. W., and Powers, Ryan M.. 2019. “Great Expectations: The Democratic Advantage in Trade Attitudes.” Working Paper. At https://bit.ly/3qxHKQQ, accessed December 29, 2021.Google Scholar
Dafoe, Allan, Zhang, Baobao, and Caughey, Devin. 2018. “Information Equivalence in Survey Experiments.” Political Analysis 26, no. 4: 399416. At https://doi.org/10.1017/pan.2018.9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
DiGiuseppe, Matthew, and Kleinberg, Katja B.. 2019. “Economics, Security, and Individual-Level Preferences for Trade Agreements.” International Interactions 45, no. 2: 289315. At https://doi.org/10.1080/03050629.2019.1551007.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Doyle, Michael W. 1997. Ways of War and Peace: Realism, Liberalism, and Socialism. New York, N.Y.: W. W. Norton & Co.Google Scholar
Fearon, James D. 1994. “Domestic Political Audiences and the Escalation of International Disputes.” American Political Science Review 88, no. 3: 577–92. At https://doi.org/10.2307/2944796.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gowa, Joanne. 1989. “Bipolarity, Multipolarity, and Free Trade.” American Political Science Review 83, no. 4: 1245–56. At https://doi.org/10.2307/1961667.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gowa, Joanne. 1994. Allies, Adversaries, and International Trade. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Gowa, Joanne, and Mansfield, Edward D.. 1993. “Power Politics and International Trade.” American Political Science Review 87, no. 2: 408–20. At https://doi.org/10.2307/2939050.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gowa, Joanne, and Mansfield, Edward D.. 2004. “Alliances, Imperfect Markets, and Major-Power Trade.” International Organization 58, no. 4: 775805. At https://doi.org/10.1017/S002081830404024X.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Green, Michael J., and Goodman, Matthew P.. 2015. “After TPP: The Geopolitics of Asia and the Pacific.” Washington Quarterly 38, no. 4: 1934. At https://doi.org/10.1080/0163660X.2015.1125827.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Guisinger, Alexandra. 2009. “Determining Trade Policy: Do Voters Hold Politicians Accountable?” International Organization 63, no. 3: 533–57. At https://doi.org/10.1017/S0020818309090183.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Guisinger, Alexandra. 2017. American Opinion on Trade: Preferences without Politics. New York, N.Y.: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haidt, Jonathan. 2001. “The Emotional Dog and its Rational Tail: A Social Intuitionist Approach to Moral Judgment.” Psychological Review 108, no. 4: 814–34. At https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295x.108.4.814.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hainmueller, Jens, and Hiscox, Michael J.. 2006. “Learning to Love Globalization: Education and Individual Attitudes toward International Trade.” International Organization 60, no. 2: 469–98. At https://doi.org/10.1017/S0020818306060140.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hegre, Havard. 2000. “Development and the Liberal Peace: What Does It Take to be a Trading State?” Journal of Peace Research 37, no. 1: 530. At https://doi.org/10.1177/0022343300037001001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Herrmann, Richard K., Tetlock, Philip E., and Diascro, Matthew N.. 2001. “How Americans Think about Trade: Reconciling Conflicts among Money, Power, and Principles.” International Studies Quarterly 45, no. 2: 191218. At https://doi.org/10.1111/0020-8833.00188.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Huff, Connor, and Tingley, Dustin. 2015. “‘Who Are These People?’ Evaluating the Demographic Characteristics and Political Preferences of MTurk Survey Respondents.” Research & Politics 2, no. 3. At https://doi.org/10.1177/2053168015604648.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jacobs, Lawrence R., and Page, Benjamin I.. 2005. “Who Influences US Foreign Policy?American Political Science Review 99, no. 1: 107–23. At https://doi.org/10.1017/S000305540505152X.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jervis, Robert. 1976. Perception and Misperception in International Politics. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Kaltenthaler, Karl, and Miller, William J.. 2013. “Social Psychology and Public Support for Trade Liberalization.” International Studies Quarterly 57, no. 4: 784–90. At https://doi.org/10.1111/isqu.12083.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kertzer, Joshua D., Rathbun, Brian C., and Rathbun, Nina Srinivasan. 2020. “The Price of Peace: Motivated Reasoning and Costly Signaling in International Relations.” International Organization 74, no. 1: 95118. At https://doi.org/10.1017/S0020818319000328.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kinder, Donald R., and Kam, Cindy D.. 2010. Us Against Them: Ethnocentric Foundations of American Opinion. Chicago, Ill.: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Kleinberg, Katja B., and Fordham, Benjamin O.. 2013. “The Domestic Politics of Trade and Conflict.” International Studies Quarterly 57, no. 3: 605–19. At https://doi.org/10.1111/isqu.12016.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kuo, Jason, and Naoi, Megumi. 2015. “Individual Attitudes.” In Martin, Lisa, ed., The Oxford Handbook of the Political Economy of International Trade. New York, N.Y.: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Kwon, Pearl Jinju. 2014. “The Re-Evaluation of the Sunshine Policy: Failure or Success?” Public Sphere: Journal of Public Policy 2, no. 1: 101–13. At https://psj.lse.ac.uk/articles/abstract/21, accessed January 13, 2022.Google Scholar
Leeds, Brett Ashley, Long, Andrew G., and Mitchell, Sara McLaughlin. 2000. “Reevaluating Alliance Reliability: Specific Threats, Specific Promises.” Journal of Conflict Resolution 44, no. 5: 686–99. At https://www.jstor.org/stable/174649.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lenz, Gabriel S. 2012. Follow the Leader? How Voters Respond to Politicians’ Policies and Performance. Chicago, Ill.: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Long, Andrew G., and Leeds, Brett Ashley. 2006. “Trading for Security: Military Alliances and Economic Agreements.” Journal of Peace Research 43, no. 4: 433–51. At https://doi.org/10.1177/0022343306065884.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mansfield, Edward D., and Bronson, Rachel. 1997. “Alliances, Preferential Trading Arrangements, and International Trade.” American Political Science Review 91, no. 1: 94107. At https://doi.org/10.2307/2952261.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mansfield, Edward D., and Mutz, Diana C.. 2009. “Support for Free Trade: Self-Interest, Sociotropic Politics, and Out-Group Anxiety.” International Organization 63, no. 3: 425–57. At https://doi.org/10.1017/S0020818309090158.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Margalit, Yotam. 2012. “Lost in Globalization: International Economic Integration and the Sources of Popular Discontent.” International Studies Quarterly 56, no. 3: 484500. At https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2478.2012.00747.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mastanduno, Michael. 1992. Economic Containment: COCOM and the Politics of East-West Trade. Ithaca, N.Y.: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Mayda, Anna Maria, and Rodrik, Dani. 2005. “Why Are Some People (and Countries) More Protectionist than Others?” European Economic Review 49, no. 6: 1393–430. At https://doi.org/10.1016/j.euroecorev.2004.01.002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mercer, Jonathan. 1996. Reputation and International Politics. Ithaca, N.Y.: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Morrow, James D., Siverson, Randolph M., and Tabares, Tressa E.. 1998. “The Political Determinants of International Trade: The Major Powers, 1907–1990.” American Political Science Review 92, no. 3: 649–61. At https://doi.org/10.2307/2585487.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mullinix, Kevin J., Leeper, Thomas J., Druckman, James N. and Freese, Jeremy. 2015. “The Generalizability of Survey Experiments.” Journal of Experimental Political Science 2, no. 2: 109–38. At https://doi.org/10.1017/XPS.2015.19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mutz, Diana C., and Kim, Eunji. 2017. “The Impact of In-Group Favoritism on Trade Preferences.” International Organization 71, no. 4: 827–50. At https://doi.org/10.1017/S0020818317000327.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nyhan, Brendan, and Reifler, Jason. 2010. “When Corrections Fail: The Persistence of Political Misperceptions.” Political Behavior 32, no. 2: 303–30. At https://doi.org/10.1007/s11109-010-9112-2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Oneal, John R., Oneal, Frances H., Maoz, Zeev, and Russett, Bruce. 1996. “The Liberal Peace: Interdependence, Democracy, and International Conflict, 1950–85.” Journal of Peace Research 33, no. 1: 1128. At https://doi.org/10.1177/0022343396033001002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Oneal, John R., and Russet, Bruce M.. 1997. “The Classical Liberals Were Right: Democracy, Interdependence, and Conflict, 1950–1985.” International Studies Quarterly 41, no. 2: 267–93. At https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-2478.00042.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Page, Benjamin I., and Shapiro, Robert Y.. 1992. The Rational Public: Fifty Years of Trends in Americans’ Policy Preferences. Chicago, Ill.: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Peterson, Susan. 1995. “How Democracies Differ: Public Opinion, State Structure, and the Lessons of the Fashoda Crisis.” Security Studies 5, no. 1: 337. At https://doi.org/10.1080/09636419508429251.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rathbun, Brian C., Kertzer, Joshua D., Reifler, Jason, Goren, Paul, and Scotto, Thomas J.. 2016. “Taking Foreign Policy Personally: Personal Values and Foreign Policy Attitudes.” International Studies Quarterly 60, no. 1: 124–37. At https://doi.org/10.1093/isq/sqv012.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rho, Sungmin, and Tomz, Michael. 2017. “Why Don't Trade Preferences Reflect Economic Self-Interest?International Organization 71, S1: S85108. At https://doi.org/10.1017/S0020818316000394.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Romberg, Alan D. 2014. “Sunshine Heats Up Taiwan Politics, Affects PRC Tactics.” China Leadership Monitor 44, no. 2. At https://www.hoover.org/research/sunshine-heats-taiwan-politics-affects-prc-tactics, accessed January 13, 2022.Google Scholar
Rose, Andrew K. 2016. “Like Me, Buy Me: The Effect of Soft Power on Exports.” Economics & Politics 28, no. 2: 216–32. At https://doi.org/10.1111/ecpo.12077.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Russett, Bruce. 1990. Controlling the Sword: The Democratic Governance of National Security. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Russett, Bruce, and Oneal, John R.. 2000. Triangulating Peace: Democracy, Interdependence, and International Organizations. New York, N.Y.: W. W. Norton & Co.Google Scholar
Scheve, Kenneth F., and Slaughter, Matthew J.. 2001. “What Determines Individual Trade-Policy Preferences?” Journal of International Economics 54, no. 2: 267–92. At https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-1996(00)00094-5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Silverstein, Brett. 1989. “Enemy Images: The Psychology of US Attitudes and Cognitions Regarding the Soviet Union.” American Psychologist 44, no. 6: 903–13. At https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.44.6.903.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Spilker, Gabriele, Bernauer, Thomas, and Umaña, Victor. 2016. “Selecting Partner Countries for Preferential Trade Agreements: Experimental Evidence from Costa Rica, Nicaragua, and Vietnam.” International Studies Quarterly 60, no. 4: 706–18. At https://doi.org/10.1093/isq/sqv024.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Taber, Charles S., and Lodge, Milton. 2006. “Motivated Skepticism in the Evaluation of Political Beliefs.” American Journal of Political Science 50, no. 3: 755–69. At https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5907.2006.00214.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tetlock, Philip E. 1998. “Social Psychology and World Politics.” In Gilbert, Daniel T., Fiske, Susan T., and Lindzey, Gardner, eds., The Handbook of Social Psychology, 4th ed., vol. 2. New York, N.Y.: McGraw-Hill: 868912.Google Scholar
Tomz, Michael. 2007. “Domestic Audience Costs in International Relations: An Experimental Approach.” International Organization 61, no. 4: 821–40. At https://doi.org/10.1017/S0020818307070282.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tomz, Michael R., and Weeks, Jessica L. P.. 2013. “Public Opinion and the Democratic Peace.” American Political Science Review 107, no. 4: 849–65. At https://doi.org/10.1017/S0003055413000488.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Verdier, Daniel. 1994. Democracy and International Trade: Britain, France, and the United States, 1860–1990. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Wu, Wen-Chin. 2019. “Big Government Sentiment and Support for Protectionism in East Asia.” International Political Science Review 40, no. 1: 7389. At https://doi.org/10.1177/0192512116682359.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yergin, Daniel. 1977. Shattered Peace: The Origins of the Cold War and the National Security State. Boston, Mass.: Houghton Mifflin.Google Scholar
Zaller, John R. 1992. The Nature and Origins of Mass Opinion. New York, N.Y.: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Supplementary material: Link

Carnegie and Gaikwad Dataset

Link
Supplementary material: PDF

Carnegie and Gaikwad supplementary material

Carnegie and Gaikwad supplementary material

Download Carnegie and Gaikwad supplementary material(PDF)
PDF 919.1 KB