Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-dsjbd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-30T06:45:42.156Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Policy Analysis as a Vocation

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  13 June 2011

Marc Landy
Marc Landy
Affiliation:
Boston College
Get access

Abstract

Three recent works provide the point of departure for assessing the performance of the new profession of policy analysis. Both the scope of the enterprise and the standards it adopts for evaluating policy are found to be excessively narrow. A revised framework for policy analysis is proposed whose scope is broadened to encompass the design of policy-making procedures as well as substantive policy outcomes. Such procedures have a vital impact upon how policy problems are defined and how preferences concerning them are formed. The standards for evaluating policy are expanded to include an explicit consideration of citizenship. All policies and policy-making procedures directly or indirectly affect the capacity for self-government. Therefore they must be judged, at least in part, in terms of how they influence the capabilities of citizens to participate in public life and the willingness of citizens to do so.

Type
Review Articles
Information
World Politics , Volume 33 , Issue 3 , April 1981 , pp. 468 - 484
Copyright
Copyright © Trustees of Princeton University 1981

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Chandler, Alfred D. Jr, Strategy and Structure: Chapters in the History of Industrial Enterprise (Cambridge, Mass.: The M.I.T. Press, 1962).Google Scholar

2 Schattschneider, Elmer Eric, The Semi-Sovereign People: A Realist's View of Democracy in America (New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston, 1960).Google Scholar

3 Schelling, Thomas C., The Strategy of Conflict (New York: Oxford University Press, 1963), 24.Google Scholar

4 RARE I, conducted a few years earlier, proved to be an ignominious failure.

5 Interview with Zane Smith, former director of RARE II, October 17, 1979.

6 I owe this conceptualization, and a great deal more, to my deliberations with Marc Roberts and Stephen Thomas, both of the Harvard School of Public Health.

7 U.S. Forest Service, RARE II Draft Environmental Impact Statement, Department of Agriculture, Washington, D.C., June 8, 1978.Google Scholar

8 Joseph M. Bessette, “Deliberation in Congress,” paper delivered at the 1979 Annual Meeting of the American Political Science Association, Washington, D.C. This excellent paper contains many insights into legislative deliberation.

9 Arendt, Hannah, Totalitarianism: Part III of The Origins of Totalitarianism (New York: Harcourt, Brace & World, 1966), p. 21.Google Scholar

10 Tocqueville, Alexis de, Democracy in America, ed. Bradley, Philip (New York: Random House, 1945), Vol. I, 68–71Google Scholar; Vol. II, 115.

11 Quarks, John, “Federal Regulation of New Industrial Plants,” Environmental Reporter, Monograph 28 (May 4, 1978), 7–8.Google Scholar

12 Selznick, Philip, TVA and the Grassroots: A Study in Formal Organization (New York: Harper & Row, 1966).Google Scholar

13 Lewis, John D., “Democratic Planning in Agriculture,” American Political Science Review, XXXV (April and June 1941).Google Scholar

14 McConnell, Grant, Private Power and American Democracy (New York: Knopf, 1967).Google Scholar

15 Banfield, Edward, Political Influence (Glencoe, Ill.: Free Press, 1961).Google Scholar

16 Caro, Robert A., The Power Broker: Robert Moses and the Fall of New York (New York: Knopf, 1974).Google Scholar

17 Broder, David S., The Party's Over: The Failure of Politics in America (New York: Harper & Row, 1972).Google Scholar