Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-dsjbd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-23T06:18:22.401Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Ideological Bases of Soviet Foreign Policy

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 July 2011

Paul E. Zinner
Paul E. Zinner
Affiliation:
The Russian Research Center, Harvard University
Get access

Extract

Foreign policy, the very existence of which Soviet leaders admitted only hesitatingly during the green years of the Revolution—although they availed themselves of it as an indispensable tool from the moment they gained power—has become a primary weapon in safeguarding the interests of the “Socialist Fatherland” and propagating the struggle against “world capitalism.”

Type
Research Article
Information
World Politics , Volume 4 , Issue 4 , July 1952 , pp. 488 - 511
Copyright
Copyright © Trustees of Princeton University 1952

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 The author gratefully acknowledges the generous assistance of the Russian Research Center, Harvard University, which made this study possible.

2 On the task of studying the history of the Stalinist foreign policy of the Soviet Union, Voprosy Istorii, No. 4, April 1950, translated in the Current Digest of the Soviet Press, II, No. 31, September 16, 1950.

3 Ibid.

4 See Trotsky, L., The Third International alter Lenin, New York, 1936.Google Scholar

5 Stalin, J., Leninism, London, 1928, p. 221.Google Scholar

6 Ibid., pp. 354ff.

7 Deutscher, I., Stalin: A Political Biography, London and New York, 1949, p. 410.Google Scholar

8 Stalin, J., Leninism, Selected Writings, New York, 1942, pp. 302ff.Google Scholar

9 Translation as quoted in Deutscher, , op. cit., p. 411.Google Scholar

10 Barghoorn, F. C., “The Soviet Union between War and Cold War,” Annals, American Academy of Political and Social Science, No. 263 (May 1949), 4Google Scholar.

11 Pravda, February 10, 1946.

12 Bundy, McGeorge, “The Test of Yalta,” Foreign Affairs, XXVII (July 1949), 618.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

13 The Soviet-Yugoslav Dispute: Text of the Published Correspondence, Royal Institute of International Affairs, London and New York, 1948, p. 51.

14 For a discussion of this problem see Handler, M. S., “The New Pattern of Soviet Aggression,” New York Times Magazine, October 1, 1950, p. 32.Google Scholar

15 This, of course, does not mean that the Soviet Union has abandoned hope and effort to reunite Germany under “proper” conditions.

16 The nature of the Soviet peace campaign is perhaps most sharply defined by the following excerpt from the “Program of the Comintern”: “There is a glaring contradiction between the imperialists' policy of piling up armaments and their hypocritical talk about peace. There is no such contradiction, however, between the Soviet governments' preparations for defense and for revolutionary war and a consistent peace policy.” International Press Correspondence, vai, No. 84 (November 28, 1928), 1590.

17 Lenin, V. I., “Better Less, but Better,” The Essentials of Lenin, London, 1947, 11, 852ff.Google Scholar

18 Berëzkin, A., SShA—Aktivnyi Organizator i Uchastnik Voennoi Intervenisti Protiv Sovetskoi Rossii (1918–1920); Gospolitizdat, 1949.Google Scholar (For this work the author was awarded a Stalin prize in 1951.)

19 New Times, No. 1, January 1, 1950.

20 Lenin, V. I., “Left-Wing” Communism: An Infantile Disorder, New York, 1934, pp. 52 and 76.Google Scholar

21 International Press Correspondence, loccit., p. 1590.

22 See Introduction to Stebbins, Richard P. et al., The United States in World Affairs, 1949, Council on Foreign Relations, New York, 1950, p. viii.Google Scholar