Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-dlnhk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-26T11:03:05.293Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Domestic Institutions beyond the Nation-State: Charting the New Interdependence Approach

Review products

Büthe Tim and Mattli Walter. 2011. The New Global Rulers: The Privatization of Regulation in the World Economy. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press, 301 pp.

Posner Elliot. 2009. The Origins of Europe's New Stock Markets. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 240 pp.

Raustiala Kal. 2009. Does the Constitution Follow the Flag? The Evolution of Territoriality in American Law. New York, N.Y.: Oxford University Press, 313 pp.

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 March 2014

Get access

Abstract

What is the relationship between domestic and international politics in a world of economic interdependence? This article discusses and organizes an emerging body of scholarship, which the authors label the new interdependence approach, addressing how transnational interactions shape domestic institutions and global politics in a world of economic interdependence. This literature makes three important contributions. First, it examines how domestic institutions affect the ability of political actors to construct the rules and norms governing interdependent relations and thus present a source of asymmetric power. Second, it explores how interdependence alters domestic political institutions through processes of diffusion, transgovernmental coordination, and extraterritorial application and in turn how it changes the national institutions mediating internal debates on globalization. Third, it studies the shifting boundaries of political contestation through which substate actors affect decision making in foreign jurisdictions. Given the importance of institutional change to the new interdependence agenda, the authors suggest several instances where historical institutionalist tools might be exploited to address these transnational dynamics, in particular, mechanisms of cross-national sequencing and change strategies of substate actors. As globalization continues, it will be ever more difficult to examine national trajectories of institutional change in isolation from each other. Equally, it will be difficult to understand international institutions without paying attention to the ways in which they both transform and are transformed by domestic institutional politics. While the new interdependence approach does not yet cohere as a single voice, the authors believe that it offers an innovative agenda that holds tremendous promise for both comparative and international relations research as it calls on scholars to reconsider the dynamic nature of globalization for global politics.

Type
Review Article
Copyright
Copyright © Trustees of Princeton University 2014 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)