Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-l7hp2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-26T09:59:55.056Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Choice in the West*

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 July 2011

S. Bernard
Affiliation:
Institut Emile Vandervelde, Centre d'Etudes du Parti Socialiste Belge, in Brussels.
Get access

Extract

The advent of a new administration in the United States and the passage of seven years since the end of World War II make it appropriate to review the political situation which has developed in Europe during that period and to ask what choices now are open to the West in its relations with the Soviet Union.

The end of World War II found Europe torn between conflicting conceptions of international politics and of the goals that its members should seek. The democratic powers, led by the United States, viewed the world in traditional, Western, terms. The major problem, as they saw it, was one of working out a moral and legal order to which all powers could subscribe, and in which they would live. Quite independently of the environment, they assumed that one political order was both more practicable and more desirable than some other, and that their policies should be directed toward its attainment.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Trustees of Princeton University 1953

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Stalin, Joseph, Leninism, Moscow-Leningrad, 1934, 1, p. 15.Google Scholar

2 Ibid., pp. 40–41.

3 Assignment of Ground Forces of the United States to Duty in the European Area, Hearings Before the Committee on Foreign Relations and the Committee on Armed Services, United States Senate, 82nd Congress, 1st session, U.S. Govt. Printing Office, Washington, D.C., 1951.