No CrossRef data available.
We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.
We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 18 July 2011
MANKIND'S latest technological triumph—the ability to split certain atoms and harness the resultant energy for either destruction or construction—constitutes one of the most provocative developments in modern international relations. It not only creates the greatest opportunity for suicide yet available to humanity; it also introduces a new stage in the scientific, industrial, and technological revolutions which have given modernity its primary characteristics. For atomic power constitutes an entirely new source of energy capable of supplementing or even of replacing that traditionally derivable from fossil fuels and falling water. Moreover, the amounts of fissionable matter necessary to produce it are so small, in contrast to existing sources of power, that problems of fuel transportation are almost completely eliminated.
1 “Peaceful Uses of Atomic Energy,” Report of the Panel on the Impact of the Peaceful Uses of Atomic Energy to the Joint Committee on Atomic Energy, I, Washington, D.C., January 1956, p. 97.
2 Ackerman, Edward A., Japan's Natural Resources, Chicago, III., 1953, p. 179.Google Scholar
3 Japan, Economie Stabilization Board, Economic Survey of Japan, 1951–1952, Tokyo, 1952, p. 48.Google Scholar
4 Staley, Eugene, The Future of Underdeveloped Countries, New York, 1954, p. 216.Google Scholar
5 Levy, Marion J. Jr, “Contrasting Factors in the Modernization of China and Japan,” Economic Development and Cultural Change, II (October 1953), pp. 161–97.Google Scholar
6 United Nations, Department of Economic and Social Affairs, Economic Survey of Ana and the Far East, 1954, Bangkok, 1955, p. 134.Google Scholar
7 See report prepared by the Japanese government for the Atomic Industrial Forum, Inc., and reproduced in the latter's publication, World Development of Atomic Energy, New York, July 1955.Google Scholar
8 Passin, Herbert, “Japan and the H-Bomb,” Bulletin of Atomic Scientists, XI, No. 8 (October 1955), pp. 289–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar