Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-dsjbd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-23T11:28:08.277Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Technology Transfer: West-South Perspective

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  13 June 2011

Kazimierz Z. Poznanski
Get access

Extract

Technology transfer is becoming an increasingly controversial issue in world politics. After many years of enthusiasm among both importers and exporters of technology, views have started to diversify, and the parties involved have found themselves in conflict. The most visible element of the current controversy is the disillusionment among the countries of the South regarding the ease with which they expected to become industrialized through the importation of Western technology. There are also some signs of disappointment in the West, especially in the United States, where the fear has arisen that the exported technology may be underpriced and that the competitive position of the United States may be eroding relative to that of the importing countries. In this article, I will deal with only one dimension of the current debate—namely, the experience of developing countries as importers of technology from the West.

Type
Review Article
Information
World Politics , Volume 37 , Issue 1 , October 1984 , pp. 134 - 152
Copyright
Copyright © Trustees of Princeton University 1984

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 See Gilpin, Robert G., U.S. Power and the Multinational Corporations (New York: Basic Books, 1978)Google Scholar.

2 See Evans, Peter, Dependent Development: The Alliance of Multinational, State and Local Capital in Brazil (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1979), 172–84Google Scholar, as well as the volumes by Mytelka and by Sagasti, under review. Also see Mytelka, Lynn K., “Licensing and Technology Dependence in the Andean Group,” World Development (1979), 447–59Google Scholar.

3 North-South Technology Transfer: The Adjustment Ahead (Paris: OECD, 1981)Google Scholar. Also see Technology Transfer to Developing Countries, Analytical Study No. 7, Tentative Identification of Main Feedback Effects (Paris: OECD, 1979)Google Scholar.

4 From Johan Annerstedt, “Global Resources of Research and Experience: Some Basic Indicators in a Changing International Scientific-Technological Order,” conference paper (Algiers, September, 1978), 16.

5 Ibid., 18.

6 “Science Resources,” Newsletter OECD (No. 2, Spring 1977)Google Scholar, and Science and Technology Policy Outlook (Paris: OECD 1978)Google Scholar.

7 See “Forum for Korean Brains,” Korea News Review, April 18, 1981, p. 18Google Scholar; and “In Development You Can't Beg, Borrow or Steal,” Far Eastern Economic Review, May 14, 1982, p. 69Google Scholar.

8 Binggian, Wang, “Reports on Financial Work,” Beijing Review, No. 39 (September 29, 1980), 18Google Scholar. Also, Suttmeier, Richard P., “Moon-Ghetto Problems in China's Alternative Scientific Futures,” conference on “China: The 1980 Era: An Exercise in Retrospective Futurology,” University of Chicago (November 13–15, 1981), 12Google Scholar.

9 Long, Franklin A., “Science and Technology in India: Their Role in National Development,” in Mellor, John W., ed., India: A Rising Middle Power (Boulder, Colo.: Westview Press, 1979), 234Google Scholar.

10 Vaitsos, Constantin, “Patents Revisited: Their Function in Developing Countries,” Journal of Development Studies 10 (October 1973), 378Google Scholar.

11 Long (fn. 9), 237.

12 Szuprowicz, Bohdan O., “Electronics,” in Orleans, Leo A., ed., Science in Contemporary China (Stanford, Calif.: Stanford University Press, 1980), 435–62Google Scholar.

13 Nicolaas Bloembergen, “Physics,” in Orleans (fn. 12), 98–99.

14 Maciotti, Manfredo, “The P.R. China: A Technological Power in the Making,” Asia Quarterly (No. 4, 1979), 333Google Scholar.

15 Long (fn. 9), 253.

16 Bhagavan, M. B., “Innovations in Industry,” Seminar, No. 258 (February 1981), 29–30Google Scholar.

17 Bohdan, and Szuprowicz, Maria, Doing Business with the People's Republic of China (New York: John Wiley & Sons, 1978)Google Scholar.

18 Redick, John R., “The Tlatelolco Regime and Nonproliferation in Latin America,” International Organization 35 (Winter 1981), 103–34CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

19 George H. Quester, “Enlisting Post-1974 India to the Cause of Nonproliferation,” in Mellor (fn. 9), 189–212.

20 World Armaments and Disarmaments, SIPRI Yearbook 1979 (London: Taylor & Francis, 1980)Google Scholar.

21 Technology Transfer to Developing Countries, Analytical Study No. 2 (Paris: OECD, 1979), 38Google Scholar.

22 Liang Xunxian, “China's Machine Tool Industry,” China Business Review (November/December 1981).

23 United Nations, Statistics of World Trade in Steel (New York: United Nations, 1981)Google Scholar. See also “Prospects for the Steel Industry in Developing Countries” (Vienna: UNIDO 1979)Google Scholar.

24 See Cornford, Andrew J. and Glasgow, Raymond B., “The Process of Structural Change in the World Economy: Some Aspects of the Rise of the Shipbuilding Industry in Developing Countries,” Trade and Development (No. 3, 1982)Google Scholar.

25 Bulletin of Statistics of World Trade in Engineering Products (New York: United Nations, 1981)Google Scholar.

26 Xunxian (fn. 22).

27 Trade by Commodities. Market Summaries: Imports, 1980, Statistics of Foreign Trade (Paris: OECD, 1981)Google Scholar.

28 See Diaz-Alejandro, Carlos F., “Foreign Direct Investment by Latin America,” in Agmon, Tamir and Kindleberger, Charles P., eds., Multinationals from Small Countries (Cambridge: MIT Press, 1979)Google Scholar.

29 Lall, Sanjaya, “Developing Countries as Exporters of Industrial Technology,” Research Policy (No. 9, 1980), 4–24Google Scholar.

30 Encarnation, Denis J., “The Political Economy of Indian Joint Industrial Ventures Abroad,” International Organization 36 (Winter 1982), 32CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

31 See also Evans (fn. 2).

32 Ross, Andrew, “Arms Production in Developing Countries: The Continuing Proliferation of Conventional Weapons,” mimeo, Center of International Studies, Princeton University (August 1980), 8Google Scholar.

33 Ibid., 15–16.

34 Kim, Linsu, “Stages of Development of Industrial Technology in a Developing Country: A Model,” Research Policy (No. 9, 1980), 254–77CrossRefGoogle Scholar, shows that other South Korean industries—electrical appliances, agricultural machinery, and automobiles—have gone through a similar process. For an opposite opinion, see Suh, S. Chul, “Development of a New Industry through Exports: The Electronics Industry in Korea,” in Hong, Wu and Krueger, Ann O., eds., Trade and Development in Korea (Seoul: Korea Development Institute, 1975), 119Google Scholar.

35 Wionczek, Miguel S., “On the Visibility of a Policy for Science and Technology in Mexico,” Latin American Research Review 16 (No. 1, 1981)Google Scholar.

36 Street, James H., “Political Intervention in Science in Latin America,” Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists 37 (February 1981), 14–23CrossRefGoogle Scholar. Also see Joel Primack, “Human Rights in the Southern Cone,” Ibid., 24–28.

37 See Xun, Zhou, “Research and Politics in the People's Republic of China,” Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists 35 (October 1979)Google Scholar.

38 Suttmeier, Richard P., “Politics, Modernization, and Science in China,” Problems of Communism (January/February 1981), 29Google Scholar.

39 Ahmad, Aqueil, “Science and Technology in India,” Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists 36 (November 1980), 39CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

40 Government of India, Ministry of Defence, Report it) 1979–1980) (New Delhi, 1980), 49Google Scholar.

41 Suttmeier (fn. 38), 31–32.

42 See critical review by Smith, Tony, “The Underdevelopment of Development Literature: The Case of Dependency Theory,” World Politics 31 (January 1979), 247–88CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

43 Stewart, Francis, Technology and Underdevelopment (Boulder, Colo.: Westview Press, 1977CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Muller, Ronald, “The Multinational Corporations and Underdevelopment of the Third World,” in Wilber, Charles, ed., The Political Economy of Development and Underdevelopment (New York: Random House, 1973), 132–33Google Scholar. Also see Sagasti, Mytelka.

44 Galtung, Johan, “Toward a New International Technological Order,” Alternatives 4 (1978–79), 277–300CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

45 Vaitsos, Constantin, “Government Policies for Bargaining with Transnational Enterprises in the Acquisition of Technology,” in Ramesh, Jairam and Weiss, Charles, eds., Mobilizing Technology for World Development (New York: Praeger, 1979), 105Google Scholar.

46 See also Rybczynski, Witold, Paper Heroes: A Review of Appropriate Technology (New York: Anchor Books, 1980), 45Google Scholar.

47 See quantitative evidence in Soo Chung, Byung and Lee, Chung H., “The Production Techniques by Foreign and Local Firms in Korea,” Economic Development and Cultural Change 29 (October 1980), 135–40CrossRefGoogle Scholar. This analysis shows that there are no significant differences between production technologies chosen by foreign companies and local companies. The authors argue that, if the foreign companies have chosen inappropriate technologies, they did so because of a permissive environment that affected local companies in the same way. A similar conclusion is drawn for Brazil by Morel, Samuel A. and Smith, Gordon W., “The Choice of Technology: Multinational Firms in Brazil,” Economic Development and Cultural Change 25 (January 1977) 239–64CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

48 Blumenthal, Tuvia, “Factor Proportions and Choice of Technology: The Japanese Experience,” Economic Development and Cultural Change 28 (April 1980), 547–59CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

49 Kapp, William, Environmental Policies and Development Planning in China, and Other Essays (Paris: Mouton, 1974), 28–50Google Scholar.

50 Smil, Vaclav, “Environmental Degradation in China,” Asia Survey 20 (August 1980)Google Scholar; see also Gorecka-Poznanski, Joanna, “Public Administration of Environmental Controls in Developing Countries,” mimeo, Woodrow Wilson School, Princeton University (July 1981)Google Scholar.

51 Brown, Shannon, “Foreign Technology and Economic Growth,” Problems of Communism 4 (July-August 1977), 30–40Google Scholar, defines the periods.

52 Baldev R. Nayar, “Independence, Development and Technology: Third World Quest for Technological Independencies,” mimeo (undated), 39.

53 Clark, Mill G., “Development of China's Steel Industry and Soviet Technical Aid,” SILR, Cornell University (1973)Google Scholar.

54 Mytelka, Lynn K. argues for selective de-linking in her study of African economies, “The Limits of Export-Led Development: The Ivory Coast's Experience with Multinationals,” in Ruggie, John G., ed., The Antinomies of Interdependence (New York: Columbia University Press, 1983)Google Scholar.

55 For critical comments on the idea of changing the current patent law, see Lall, Sanjaya, “The Patent System and the Transfer of Technology to Less Developed Countries,” Journal of World Trade Law (No. 7, 1975), 1–16Google Scholar.

56 “Latin America Gives Ground on Technology Issue,” Latin American Economic Report 7 (March 30, 1979), 102–3Google Scholar.

57 See “Foreign Exchange Regulation Act 1974,” IIC Economic News Digest 1 (August 10, 1981), 19–20Google Scholar. The impact of these regulations on foreign investment may be judged by United States private investment, which is the second-largest source of direct foreign investment in India. In 1981, it was estimated to be about 350 million dollars. See “Indo-US Joint Ventures—An Appraisal,” Ibid., 17–18.

58 Vernon, Raymond and Davidson, William H., “Foreign Production of TechnologyIntensive Products by U.S.-Based Multinational Enterprises,” mimeo (Harvard University, January 15, 1979), 10Google Scholar.

59 Also see Legislation and Regulation on Technology Transfers: Empirical Analysis of Their Effect in Selected Countries (Geneva: UNCTAD, 1980)Google Scholar.

60 Technology Transfer to Developing Countries (fn. 21), 42.

61 Grieco, Joseph M., “Between Dependency and Autonomy: India's Experience with the International Computer Industry,” International Organization 36 (Summer 1982), 631CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

62 Ibid., 615–16.

63 U.S. Exports: Basic Products by World Areas, U.S. Department of Commerce (Washington, D.C., 1981)Google Scholar.

64 From Trade by Commodities—Market Summaries: Imports, 1980 Statistics of Foreign Trade (Paris: OECD, 1981)Google Scholar.

65 Grieco (fn. 61), 617.

66 Mexico, Computers and Peripheral Equipment, Country Market Survey, U.S. Department of Commerce, International Trade Administration, CMS 81–308 (February 1981), 6Google Scholar.

67 “Computer Companies Slip Through the Back Door in Mexico,” Latin American Weekly Report (June 11, 1982), 8Google Scholar.

68 Venezuela, Computers and Peripheral Equipment, Country Market Survey, U.S. Department of Commerce, International Trade Administration, CMS-312 (March 1981), 4Google Scholar.

69 Taiwan, Computers and Peripheral Equipment, Country Market Survey, U.S. Department of Commerce, International Trade Administration, CSM 81–310 (March 1981), 3Google Scholar.

70 South Korea, Computers and Peripheral Equipment, Country Market Survey, U.S. Department of Commerce, International Trade Administration, CMS 81–311 (March 1981), 3Google Scholar.