Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-2brh9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-26T08:43:13.581Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Religious Roots of Modern International Relations

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  13 June 2011

Daniel Philpott
Daniel Philpott
Affiliation:
University of California, Santa Barbara
Get access

Abstract

The Protestant Reformation was a crucial spring of modern international relations. Had it lever occurred, a system of sovereign states would not have arrived, at least not in the form or at he time that it did at the Peace of Westphalia. This is the counterfactual the author seeks to sustain. He first advances an elaborated but qualified defense of the conventional wisdom that Westphalia is the origin of modern international relations. He then accounts for how Protestant deas exerted influence through transforming identities and exercising social power. Structural heories, emphasizing changes in material power, are skeptical of this account. The author roots lis empirical defense of ideas in the strong correlation between Reformation crises and polities' interests in Westphalia. A description of the historical causal pathways running from ideas to political interest then follows. Germany and France are brought as cases to illustrate two of these pathways. Finally, the author shows the evidentiary weakness of alternative structural material explanations.

Type
Research Article
Information
World Politics , Volume 52 , Issue 2 , January 2000 , pp. 206 - 245
Copyright
Copyright © Trustees of Princeton University 2000

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 These include Kratochwil, Friedrich, “Of Systems, Boundaries, and Territoriality: An Inquiry into the Formation of the States System,” World Politics 39 (October 1986)CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Ruggie, John Gerard, “Territoriality and Beyond: Problematizing Modernity in International Relations,” International Organization 47 (Winter 1993)CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Bartelson, Jens, A Genealogy of Sovereignty (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1995)CrossRefGoogle Scholar; and Hall, Rodney Bruce, National Collective Identity: Social Constructs and International Systems (New York: Columbia University Press, 1999)Google Scholar. On the works of the constructivists more generally, see Wendt, Alexander, “The Agent-Structure Problem in International Relations Theory,” International Organization 41 (Summer 1987)CrossRefGoogle Scholar; idem, “Anarchy Is What States Make of It: The Social Construction of Power Politics,” International Organization 46 (Spring 1992)Google Scholar; idem, “Collective Identity Formation and the International State,” American Political Science Review 88 (June 1994)Google Scholar; Ruggie, John Gerard, “What Makes the World Hang Together? Neo-utilitarianism and the Social Con-structivist Challenge,” International Organization 52 (Autumn 1998)CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Finnemore, Martha and Sikkink, Kathryn, “International Norm Dynamics and Political Change,” International Organization 52 (Autumn 1998)CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Checkel, Jeffrey T, “The Constructivist Turn in International Relations Theory,” World Politics 50 (January 1998)CrossRefGoogle Scholar. For works on sovereignty and its history, see Ruggie, John Gerard, “Continuity and Transformation in the World Polity: Toward a Neorealist Synthesis,” in Keohane, Robert O., ed., Neorealism and Its Critics (New York: Columbia University Press, 1986)Google Scholar; Ruggie (fn. 1,1993); Kra-tochwil (fn. 1); Bierksteker, Thomas J. and Weber, Cynthia, eds., State Sovereignty as Social Construct (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1996)CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Bartelson (fn. 1); Philpott, Daniel, “Sovereignty: An Introduction and Brief History,” Journal of International Affairs 48 (Winter 1995)Google Scholar; Krasner, Stephen D., “Sovereignty: An Institutional Perspective,” Comparative Political Studies 21 (April 1988)CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Hins-ley, F. H., Sovereignty, 2d ed. (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1986)Google Scholar; James, Alan, Sovereign State hood (London: Allen and Unwin, 1986)Google Scholar; Spruyt, Hendrik, The Sovereign State and Its Competitors (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1994)Google Scholar; Thomson, Janice, “State Sovereignty in International Relations: Bridging the Gap between Theory and Empirical Research,” International Studies Quarterly 39 (June 1995)Google Scholar; Fowler, Michael Ross and Bunck, Julie Marie, Law, Power, and the Sovereign State (University Park: Penn State Press, 1995)Google Scholar; Buzan, Barry, “The Idea of'International System': Theory Meets History,” International Political Science Review 15 (July 1994)CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Krasner, Stephen, Sovereignty: ganized Hypocrisy (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

2 I refer to these works in fnn. 47–50.

3 Krasner, , “Westphalia and All That,” in Goldstein, Judith and Keohane, Robert O., eds., Ideas and Foreign Policy: Beliefs, Institutions, and Political Change (Ithaca, N.Y.: Cornell University Press, 1993)Google Scholar

4 Gross, Leo, “The Peace of Westphalia, 1648–1948,” American Journal of International Law 42 (January 1948)CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Morgenthau, Hans, Politics among Nations: The Strugglefor Power and Peace, 6th ed. (New York: Alfred A. Knopf, 1985), 328–30Google Scholar.

5 Sharing my general definition of sovereignty are, among others, Spruyt (fn. 1), 34–36; Ruggie (fn. 1,1993), 148–52; James (fn. 1); Hinsley (fn. 1), 158; Morgenthau (fn. 4), 32–38; Keohane, Robert O., “Sovereignty, Interdependence, and International Institutions,” in Miller, Linda B. and Smith, Michael Joseph, eds., Ideas and Ideals: Essays on Politics in Honor of Stanley Hoffmann (Boulder, Colo.: Westview Press, 1993), 92–93Google Scholar; Brierly, J. L., The Law of Nations (New York: Oxford University Press, 1963), 13Google Scholar; Waltz, Kenneth, Theory of International Politics (Lexington, Mass.: Addison-Wesley, 1979), 96Google Scholar. For skeptics of attempts to define sovereignty, see Bartelson (fn. 1); Carr, E. H., The Twenty Years' Crisis (New York: Harper and Row, 1964)Google Scholar; Benn, Stanley, “Sovereignty,” Encyclopedia of Philosophy 7 (1967)Google Scholar; Oppenheim, L., International Law, vol. 1 (London: Longmans, Green, 1905)Google Scholar; Falk, Richard, “Sovereignty,” in Oxford Companion to Politics of the World (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1993)Google Scholar.

6 See especially Krasner (fn. 3), 235–64.

7 For a similar view, see Wight, Martin, Systems of States (London: Leicester, 1977)Google Scholar; and Tilly, Charles, Coercion, Capital, and European States, AD 990–1992 (Oxford: Basil Blackwell, 1992), 161–83Google Scholar.

8 Reynolds, Susan, Kingdoms and Communities in Western Europe, 900—1300 (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1984)Google Scholar; Poggi, Gianfranco, The Development of the Modern State:A Sociological Introduction (Stan ford, Calif: Stanford University Press, 1978)Google Scholar; Duby, Georges, La societe aux XI' etXII' siecles dans la gion maconnaise (Paris: Ecole Pratique des Hautes Etudes, 1953)Google Scholar. For a challenge to the consensus among medieval historians that the Middle Ages generally lacked sovereignty, see Fischer, Markus, “Feudal Europe, 800—1300: Communal Discourse and Conflictual Practices,” International Organization 46 (Spring 1992)CrossRefGoogle Scholar. For responses to Fischer, see Hall, Rodney Bruce and Kratochwil, Friedrich, “Medieval Tales: Neorealist 'Science' and the Abuse of History,” International Organization 47 (Summer 1993)CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Hall, Rodney Bruce, “Moral Authority as a Power Resource,” International Organization 51 (Autumn 1997)CrossRefGoogle Scholar. On the nature of political authority during the Middle Ages, see Strayer, J. R., The Medieval Origins of the Modern State (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1970)Google Scholar; Strayer, J. R. and Munro, Dana, Middle Ages, 395–1500 (New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts, 1959)Google Scholar; Tierney, Brian, Crisis of Church and State (Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice-Hall, 1964)Google Scholar; Mundy, John H., Europe in High Middle Ages, 1150–1309 (New York: Basic Books, 1973)Google Scholar; Ullman, Walter, Principles of Govern ment and Politics in the Middle Ages (New York: Barnes and Noble, 1974)Google Scholar; Kantorowicz, Ernst, The King's Two Bodies (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1957)Google Scholar; Ruggie (fn. 1,1986), 141–48; Spruyt (fn. 1), 34–36; Wilks, Michael, The Problem of Sovereignty in the Middle Ages (Cambridge, U.K.: At the University Press, 1964)Google Scholar.

9 Ozment, Steven, The Age of Reform, 1220–1550: An Intellectual and Religious History of Late Mt-dieval and Reformation Europe (New Haven: Yale University Press, 1980), 48Google Scholar; Kann, Robert A., A History of the Habsburg Empire (Berkeley: University of California Press, 1974), 1–24Google Scholar; Koenigsberger, H. G., The Habsburgs and Europe, 1516–1560 (Ithaca, N.Y.: Cornell University Press, 1971)Google Scholar; Berenger, Jean, History of the Habsburg Empire (London: Longman, 1994)Google Scholar.

10 On the implosion of the Italian states system, see Wight (fn. 7); Tilly (fn. 7), 77–78. On Charles V's powers, see Kann (fn. 9), 1–24; Koenigsberger (fn. 9); Berenger (fn. 9); Israel, Jonathan, The Dutcb Republic: Its Rise, Greatness, and Fall, 1477–1806 (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1995), 9–40Google Scholar; Geyl, , The Revolt of the Netherlands, 1555–1609 (London: Williams and Norgate, 1932)Google Scholar; Strauss, Gerald, Law, Resistance, and the State: The Opposition to Roman Law in Reformation Germany (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1986)CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Holborn, Hajo, A History of Modern Germany, vol. 1 (New York: Alfred A. Knopf, 1959)Google Scholar; Gagliardo, John, Germany under the Old Regime, 1600–1790 (London: Long mans, 1991)Google Scholar; Barraclough, Geoffrey, The Origins of Modern Germany (Oxford: Basil Blackwell, 1947)Google Scholar.

11 Koenigsberger (fn. 9); Barraclough (fn. 10), 355–405; Holborn (fn. 10), 284–338.

12 Holborn (fn. 10), 243–46; Barraclough (fn. 10), 371.

13 Osiander, Andreas, The States System of Europe, 1640–1990 (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1994), 72CrossRefGoogle Scholar. For the text of the Treaty of Miinster, see Israel, Fred, ed., Major Peace Treaties in Modern History, 1648–1967 (New York: Chelsea House Publishers, 1967)Google Scholar; for the Treaty of Osnabriick, see Parry, Clive, ed., The Consolidated Treaty Series (Dobbs Ferry, N.Y.: Oceana Publications, 1981)Google Scholar. On the settlement in general, see Dickmann, Fritz, “Rechtsgedanke und Machtpolitik bei Richelieu: Studienen neu en- deckten Quellen,” Historische Zeitschrift 196 (April 1963)CrossRefGoogle Scholar; idem, Der Westphaelische Frieden (Münster: Aschendorff, 1965)Google Scholar; Dickmann, Fritz et al. , eds., Acta Pads Westphalicae (Münster: Aschendorff Ver lagsbuchhandlung, 1962)Google Scholar; Pages, George, The Thirty Years War, trans. Maland, David (New York: Harper and Row, 1970)Google Scholar; Parker, Geoffrey, The Thirty Years' War (London: Routledge, Kegan, and Paul, 1997)Google Scholar; Polisensky, J. V., The Thirty Years' War, trans. Evans, Robert (Berkeley: University of California Press, 1971)Google Scholar; and Rabb, T. K., ed., The Thirty Years' War: Problems of Motive, Extent, and Effect (Boston: D. C. Heath and Company, 1964)Google Scholar.

14 On the settlement in general, see Dickmann et al. (fn. 13); Dickmann (fn. 13, 1965 and 1963); {Jages (fn. 13); Parker (fn. 13); Polisensky (fn. 13); and Rabb (fn. 13).

15 Israel (fn. 13), 27; Osiander (fn. 13), 46–47.

16 On the views of the diplomats, see Osiander (fn. 13), 27,41, 77–89; Church, William F., Richelieu and Reason of State (Princeton: Princeton University Press. 1972), 283–349Google Scholar; Roberts, Michael, Gustavus Adolphus, 2 vols. (London: Longmans, Green, 1958)Google Scholar; idem, Essays in Swedish History (London: Wei denfeld and Nicolson, 1967), 82–110Google Scholar; Burckhardt, Carl J., Richelieu and His Age (New York: Harcourt, Brace, and World, 1970)Google Scholar; Knecht, Robert, Richelieu (London: Longman, 1991)Google Scholar; du Plessis Richelieu, Armand-Jean, The Political Testament of Cardinal Richelieu: The Significant Chapters and Selections, trans. Hill, Henry Bertram (Madison: University of Wisconsin Press, 1981)Google Scholar.

17 Exceptional were the imperial circles, regional organizations of princely states that revived in the late seventeenth century and whose members would at times combine their military forces under a single command. But this exception was limited: the strong form of military cooperation was limited largely to the circles of Franconia and Swabia, composed only of small German states, and it lasted only from 1697 to 1714, when states defended themselves against the invasions of Louis XIV. See Wines, Roger, “Imperial Circles, Princely Diplomacy, and Imperial Reform, 1681—1714,” Journal Modern History 39 (March 1967), 27–29CrossRefGoogle Scholar. More generally, see Kann (fn. 9), 52, 54; Osiander (fn. 13), 46; Barraclough (fn. 10), 381–87; and Gagliardo (fn. 10).

18 Osiander (fn. 13), 40; Holborn (fn. 10), 368–69.

19 Osiander (fn. 13), 40–42.

20 Parker (fn. 13), 196–97; Holborn (fn. 10); Barraclough (fn. 10); Rabb (fn. 13); Maland, David, Europe in the Seventeenth Century (London: Macmillan, 1966)Google Scholar; Holsti, Kalevi, Peace and War: Armed Conflicts and International Order, 1648–1989 (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1991), 46–59CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

21 Holsti (fn. 20), 46–59; Osiander (fn. 13), 49; Barraclough (fn. 10), 381–87.

22 On recognition practices, see Lauterpacht, H., Recognition in International Law (Cambridge, U.K.: At the University Press, 1947)Google Scholar.

23 See Vincent, R. J., Non-intervention in International Order (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1974)Google Scholar.

24 For historians, see Holborn (fn. 10); and Barraclough (fn. 10). For social scientists who acknowledge the influence of the Reformation and treat it briefly, see Porter, Bruce, War and the Rise of the State (New York: Free Press, 1994), 68–69Google Scholar; and Hall (fn. 1), 51–67. Other scholars mention the role of other nonmaterial factors such as philosophical discourses, property rights, and the rise of Roman law. See Ruggie (fn. 1,1993); and Bartelson (fn. 1).

25 On these criteria, see Tetlock, Philip E. and Belkin, Aaron, “Counterfactual Thought Experiments in World Politics,” in Tetlock, Philip E. and Belkin, Aaron, eds., Counterfactual Thought Experiments World Politics (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1996), 21–25Google Scholar. With regard to the “minimal rewrite-of-history rule,” I will ultimately argue that even structural material forces were themselves shaped in part by the Reformation and were thus not independent of it. I claim here only that a world in which they were independent is plausibly imagined and indeed posited by most of the social scientists whom I address.

26 See Tilly (fn. 7).

27 Spruyt (fn. 1), 153–80.

28 On counterfactuals, see Fearon, James D., “Counterfactuals and Hypothesis Testing in Political Science,” World Politics 43 (January 1991)CrossRefGoogle Scholar; and Tetlock and Belkin (fn. 25).

29 Gary King, Robert O. Keohane, and Sidney Verba refer to this strategy as “making many observations from the few”; see King, , Keohane, , and Verba, , Designing Social Inquiry: Scientific Inference Qualitative Research (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1994), 217–28Google Scholar. Tetlock and Belkin (fn. 25) propose that this method can be used compatibly with and within counterfactuals (pp. 30–31). It meets what they call the “projectability” criterion.

30 March, James G. and Olsen, Johan P., “The Institutional Dynamics of International Political Orders,” International Organization 52 (Autumn 1998), 958CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

31 For general accounts of the trend, see Judith Goldstein and Robert O. Keohane, “Ideas and Foreign Policy: An Analytical Framework,” in Goldstein and Keohane (fn. 3); Katzenstein, Peter, ed., The Culture of National Security: Norms and Identity in World Politics (New York: Columbia University, 1996)Google Scholar; Hall, Peter, ed., The Political Power of Economic Ideas (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1989)Google Scholar; Wendt (fn. 1, 1994 and 1992); Blyth, Mark, “Any More Bright Ideas? The Ideational Turn of Comparative Political Economy,” Comparative Politics 29 (January 1997)CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Jacobsen, John Kurt, “Much Ado about Ideas: The Cognitive Factor in Economic Policy,” World Politics 47 (January 1995)CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Mann, Michael, The Sources of Social Power, vol. 1 (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1986)CrossRefGoogle Scholar. 321 propose my framework as a useful one for explaining the revolution at hand, not as the only process by which ideas operate. For portfolios of pathways and mechanisms, see Goldstein and Keo-hane (fn. 31), 8–26; and Katzenstein (fn. 31), 52—65.1 am not proposing a general theory that denotes the conditions under which ideas will have influence; rather, the argument is a theory of the causes of revolutions in sovereignty (revolutions in ideas) and not one of what causes revolutions in ideas.

33 For a definition of identity, see Ronald L. Jepperson, Alexander Wendt, and Peter J. Katzenstein, “Norms, Identity, and Culture in National Security,” in Katzenstein (fn. 31): “the images of individuality and distinctiveness ('selfhood') held and projected by an actor and formed (and modified over time) through relations with significant 'others'” (p. 59).

34 Shepsle, Kenneth, “Comment,” in Noll, R., ed., Regulatory Policy and the Social Sciences (Berkeley: University of California Press, 1985)Google Scholar.

35 Goldstein and Keohane (fn. 31), 16.

36 See Ripley, Brian, “Psychology, Foreign Policy, and International Relations Theory,” Political Psychology 14 (September 1993)CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

37 On processes of social construction, see Berger, Peter L. and Luckmann, Thomas, The Social Construction of Reality (New York: Doubleday, 1966)Google Scholar; Finnemore and Sikkink (fn. 1), 913.

38 Goldstein and Keohane (fn. 31), 17–20; Geoffrey Garrett and Barry R. Weingast, “Ideas, Interests, and Institutions: Constructing the European Community's Internal Market,” in Goldstein and Keohane (fn. 3); Shepsle (fn. 34); for a key source on social power, see also Mann (fn. 31).

39 On intellectual communities, see Adler, Emanuel and Haas, Peter, “Conclusion: Epistemic Communities, World Order, and the Creation of a Reflective Research Program,” International Organization 46 (Winter 1992)CrossRefGoogle Scholar. On transnational networks, see Sikkink, Kathryn, “Human Rights, Principled Issue Networks, and Sovereignty in Latin America,” International Organization 47 (Summer 1993)CrossRefGoogle Scholar; and Keck, Margaret and Sikkink, Kathryn, Activists beyond Border's:Advocacy Networks in International Politics (Ithaca, N.Y.: Cornell University Press, 1998)Google Scholar. For an example of the influence of publics, see Lumsdaine, David, Moral Vision in International Politics (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1993)Google Scholar

40 On causal pathways, see Goldstein and Keohane (fn. 31), 24–26; and Katzenstein (fn. 31), 52–65 .

41 In the first category, see Bukovansky, Mlada, “American Identity and Neutral Rights from Independence to the War of 1812,” International Organization 51 (Summer 1997)CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Price, Richard, “Reversing the Gun Sights: Transnational Civil Society Targets Land Mines,” International Organization 52 (Summer 1998)CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Richard Price and Nina Tannenwald, “Norms and Deterrence: The Nuclear and Chemical Weapons Taboo,” in Katzenstein (fn. 31); Klotz, Audie, Norms in International Relations: The Struggle againstApartheid (Ithaca, N.Y.: Cornell University Press, 1995)Google Scholar; Finnemore and Sikkink (fn 1), 898. In the second category, see, for examples, the essays in Goldstein and Keohane (fn. 3); and most of the essays in Katzenstein (fn. 31).

42 See Jepperson, Wendt, and Katzenstein (fa. 33), 58–60.

43 Such versions adopt a variety of strategies, ranging from showing how utility functions are specified by ideas, culture, or psychological schema, to asserting the rationality of the attempts of “norms entrepreneurs” to construct common knowledge and alter others' utility functions in accordance with their commitments, to devising models of how ideas modify the pursuit of rational action as “focal points” or “resolvers of uncertainty,” and to charting the social context of rational action. See Finne-more and Sikkink (fn. 1), 909–15; Goldstein and Keohane (fn. 31), 3–30; Kahler, Miles, “Rationality in International Relations,” International Organization 52 (Autumn 1998), 933–38CrossRefGoogle Scholar; March and Olsen (fh. 30), 952–54; Elster, Jon, Nuts and Boltsfor the Social Sciences (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1989)CrossRefGoogle Scholar; idem, Political Psychology (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1993)Google Scholar. For a more skeptical view of the reconcilability of constructivist and rationalist traditions, see Ruggie (fn. 1,1998), 883–85.

44 See the essays in Biersteker and Weber (fn. 1); Jepperson, Wendt, and Katzenstein (fn. 33), 45–46; Ruggie (fn. 1,1993); Ruggie (fn. 1,1998), 870; Wendt (fn. 1,1992), 412–15.

45 Hall (fn. 1), 51–58.

46 Checkel (fn. 1), 340—42; Thomson (fn. 1). See also John Gerard Ruggie's comment that “[s]ocial constructivists in international relations have not yet managed to devise a theory of constitutive rules”; Ruggie (fn. 1,1998), 872.

47 Hintze, Otto, The Historical Essays of Otto Hintze (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1975)Google Scholar; Bean, Richard, “War and the Birth of the Nation-State” Journal of Economic History 33 (March 1973)CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Porter (fn. 24); Tilly (fn. 7). The exception is Hall (fn. 1), who treats the Reformation as an important source of territorial sovereignty. Porter is also a qualified exception here, for he acknowledges the partial explanatory role of the Reformation. See Porter (fn. 24), 68–69. The locus classicus on the military revolution is Roberts (fn. 16,1967), 195—225. An impressive recent work on the long-term political sults of the military revolution is Downing, Brian, The Military Revolution and Political Change (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1992)Google Scholar, esp. 56–74. For a critique of the military revolution thesis, see Parker, Geoffrey, “The ‘Military Revolution,’ 1550–1660: A Myth?” Journal of Modern History 48 (June 1976)Google Scholar; and idem, The Military Revolution (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1988)Google Scholar.

48 North, Douglass C. and Thomas, R. P., The Rise of the Western World (Cambridge: Cambridge Uni versity Press, 1973)CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Spruyt (fn. 1).

49 Wallerstein, Immanuel, The Modern World System: Capitalist Agriculture and the Origins of the ropean World-Economy in the Sixteenth Century (New York: Academic Press, 1974)Google Scholar; Anderson, N. K., “The Reformation in Scandinavia and the Baltic,” in Elton, G. R., ed., The New Cambridge Modern History (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1958)Google Scholar.

50 See Kennedy, Paul, The Rise and Fall of the Great Powers: Economic Change and Military Conflict from 1500 to 2000 (New York: Random House, 1987), 31–73Google Scholar; Zolberg, Aristide R., “Origins of the Modern World System: A Missing Link,” World Politics 33 (January 1981), 253–58CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Dehio, Ludwig, The Precarious Balance, trans. Fulman, Charles (New York: Knopf, 1962)Google Scholar; S. H. Steinberg, “The Years War and the Conflict for European Hegemony,” in Rabb (fn. 13); Gilpin, Robert, War and Change in World Politics (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1981)CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

51 Luther, Martin, The Freedom of a Christian, trans. Lambert, W. A. and ed. Grimm, H. J., in Luther's Works, vol. 31 (Philadelphia: Westminster Press, 1957)Google Scholar; idem, Bondage of the Will, trans. Watson, S. and Drewery, Benjamin and ed. Watson, P. S., in Luther's Works, vol. 33 (Philadelphia: Westminster Press, 1972)Google Scholar; Skinner, Quentin, The Foundations of Modern Political Thought, vol. 2 (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1978)Google Scholar; Cameron, Euan, The European Reformation (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1991), 99–198Google Scholar; Oberman, Heiko, Luther: Man between God and the Devil (New Haven: Yale University Press, 1989)Google Scholar; Ozment, Steven, Protestants: The Birth of a Revolu tion (New York: Doubleday, 1992), 43–86Google Scholar; Bouyer, Louis, The Spirit and Forms of Protestantism (London: Harville Press, 1955)Google Scholar.

52 Cameron (fn. SI), 145–55.

53 Ibid., 152–53; Luther, Martin, Whether Soldiers, Too, Can Be Saved, trans. Jacobs, Charles M. and ed. Schultz, Robert C., in Luther's Works, vol. 46 (Philadelphia: Westminster Press, 1967)Google Scholar; idem, Temporal Authority: To What Extent It Should Be Obeyed, trans. Schindel, JJ. and ed. Brandt, W. I., in Luther's Works, vol. 45 (Philadelphia: Westminster Press, 1967)Google Scholar; Ozment (fn. 51), 122–40; Skinner (fn. 51), Romans 13.

54 Cameron (fn. 51), 70–78.

55 Ibid., 99–110.

56 Wuthnow, Robert, Communities of Discourse (Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1989), 131Google Scholar.

57 Ibid., 129–40. On the importance of print media, see Eisenstein, Elizabeth, “The Advent of Printing and the Protestant Revolt: A New Approach to the Disruption of Western Christendom,” Annales, E.S.C. 26 (1971)Google Scholar; Cole, Richard G., “Propaganda as a Source of Reformation History,” Lutheran Quarterly 22 (1970)Google Scholar; Davies, C. S. L., Peace, Print, and Protestantism (London: Paladin, 1977).Google Scholar

58 Ozment, Steven, The Age of Reform, 1220–1550: An Intellectual and Religious History of Late Me dieval and Reformation Europe (New Haven: Yale University Press, 1980), 222–23Google Scholar; Ozment (fn. 51), 9–86; Cameron (fn. 51), 20–37, 79–93.

59 McGrath, Alistair, The Intellectual Origins of the European Reformation (Oxford: Basil Blackwell, 1987)Google Scholar; idem, Reformation Thought: An Introduction (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1988)Google Scholar; Oberman, Heiko, The Harvest of Medieval Theology: Gabriel Biel and Late Medieval Nominalism (Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1963)Google Scholar; idem, Masters of the Reformation: The Emergence of a New Intellectual Climate in Europe, trans. Martin, Dennis (New York: Cambridge University Press, 1981)Google Scholar.

60 Wuthnow (fn. 56), 25–51; Pettegree, Andrew, The Early Reformation in Europe (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1991)Google Scholar; Moeller, Bernd, Imperial Cities and the Reformation, trans. Middlefort, H. C. Erik and Edwards, Mark U. Jr. (Philadelphia: Fortress Press, 1972)Google Scholar; Brady, Thomas, “In Search of the Godly City: The Domestication of Religion in the German Urban Reformation,” in Hsia, R. P.-C., ed., The German People and the Reformation (Ithaca, N.Y.: Cornell University Press, 1988)Google Scholar.

61 On Reformation historiography, see Ozment, Steven E., ed., Reformation Europe: A Guide to Re search (St. Louis, Mo.: Center for Reformation Research, 1982)Google Scholar; Hsia (fn. 60); Wuthnow (fn. 56), 25–51; Pettegree (fn. 60); and Scribner, Bob, Porter, Roy, and Teich, Mikulcs, eds., The Reformation in National Context (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1994)CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

62 Cameron (fn. 51), 99–110,199–318; Ozment (fn. 51), 43–86.

63 For an example of the influence of a ruling elite, in this case Gorbachev, who himself converts to and empowers new ideas, see Robert G. Herman, “Identity, Norms, and National Security: The Soviet Foreign Policy Revolution and the End of the Cold War,” in Katzenstein (fn. 31).

64 Cameron (fn. 51), 199–318.

65 The method here corresponds to the technique of “process tracing” in Alexander George's method of structured focused comparison; see George, , “Case Studies and Theory Development: The Method of Structured, Focused Comparison,” in Lauren, Paul G., ed., Diplomacy: New Approaches in History, Theory, and Policy (New York: Free Press, 1979)Google Scholar.

66 Holborn (fn. 10), 37–51, 137–39, 158, 162, 374; Chadwick, Owen, The Reformation (London: Penguin, 1964)Google Scholar; Todd, John M., Reformation (New York: Doubleday, 1971), 230–39Google Scholar; Dickens, A. G., Reformation and Society in Sixteenth Century Europe (London: Thames and Hudson, 1966), 87–106Google Scholar; Elton, R., Reformation Europe, 1517–1559 (London: Collins, 1963)Google Scholar; Barraclough (fn. 10), 262–67.

67 Elton (fn. 66), 56; Chadwick (fn. 66), 67–71; Todd (fn. 66).

68 Barraclough (fn. 10), 374.

69 Cameron (fn. 51), 199–318.

70 Ibid., 210–92; on threat theory, see Walt, Stephen, The Origin of Alliances (Ithaca, N.Y.: Cornell University Press, 1987)Google Scholar.

71 Holborn (fn. 10), 137–39, 158, 162, 284–95, 374; Chadwick (fn. 66), 67–71; Todd (fn. 67), 230–39; Dickens (fn. 66), 87–106; Elton (fn. 66); Barraclough (fn. 10); Gagliardo (fn. 10), 14; Cameron (fn. 51), 210–91.

72 Holborn (fn. 10), 37–51; Barraclough (fn. 10), 363–67; Gagliardo (fn. 10), 2–4.

73 See Cameron (fn. 51), 199–313.

74 Ibid., 101–3.

75 Ibid., 294–99; Carsten, F. L., Princes and Parliaments in Germanyfrom the Fifteenth to the Eight eenth Century (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1959)Google Scholar; Dickens, A. G., The German Nation and Martin Luther (London: Edward Arnold, 1974)Google Scholar; Brady (fn. 60).

76 McGrath (fn. 59); Oberman (fn. 59).

77 Lynch, John, Spain under the Habsburgs (New York: Oxford University Press, 1965)Google Scholar; Koenigsberger, H. G. and Mosse, George L., Europe in the Sixteenth Century (New York: Holt, Rinehart, and Winston, 1968)Google Scholar; Elliott, J. H., Europe Divided, 1559–1598 (London: Collins, 1968), 11–29Google Scholar; Osiander (fn. 13), 27—29; Meinecke, Friedrich, Machiavellianism: The Doctrine of Raison d'Etat and Its Place Modern History, trans. Scott, Douglas (Boulder, Colo.: Westview Press, 1984), 1Google Scholar; Church (fn. 16), 283–340, 480–82; Richelieu (fn. 16).

78 Porter (fn. 24), 73.

79 Dickens (fn. 66), 164–87; Elliott (fn. 77), 116–25.

80 On the religious wars in France, see Thompson, James Westfall, The Wars of Religion in France, 1559–1576 (New York: Frederick Ungar, 1909)Google Scholar. On the politiques, see Skinner (fn. 51), 249–54; and Church, William Farr, Constitutional Thought in Sixteenth-Century France (Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1941), 194–271Google Scholar. On Bodin, see Bodin, Jean, On Sovereignty: Four Chaptersfrom Six Books of the Commonwealth (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1992)CrossRefGoogle Scholar; and Franklin, Julian, Jean Bodin and the Rise of Absolutist Theory (Cambridge, U.K.: At the University Press, 1973)Google Scholar.

81 Richelieu (fn. 16); Church (fn. 16).

82 Parker, Geoffrey, The Dutch Revolt (Ithaca, N.Y.: Cornell University Press, 1977), 126–68Google Scholar; idem, Spain and the Netherlands, 1559–1659 (Glasgow: Fontana Press, 1990), 52–53Google Scholar; Lynch (fn. 77); Geyl (fn. 10); Israel (fn. 10), 106–230.

83 Parker (fn. 13), 155.

84 Roberts, Michael, The Early Vasas:A History of Sweden, 1523–1611 (Cambridge: Cambridge Uni versity Press, 1968), 68–70Google Scholar; Anderson, N. K., The Reformation in Scandinavia and the Baltic, in Elton, G. R., ed., The New Cambridge Modern History (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1958), 146–53Google Scholar; Roberts (fn. 16,1967), 78.

85 Cameron (fn. 51), 381–88.

86 Ibid., 272–74.

87 For histories of the Thirty Years' War, see fn. 13.

88 See Tetlock and Belkin (fn. 25), 21–25.

89 Spruyt (fn. 1), 22–33.

90 Kaiser, David, Politics and War: European Conflictfrom Philip II to Hitler (Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1990)Google Scholar; Parker, Geoffrey, Europe in Crisis, 1598–1648 (Ithaca, N.Y.: Cornell University Press, 1979)Google Scholar; Aston, Trevor, ed., Crisis in Europe, 1560–1660: Essaysfrom Past and Present (London: Routledge and Kegan Paul, 1965)Google Scholar; Elliott, J. H., “The Decline of Spain,” in Aston; Kautsky, John H., The Politics of Aristocratic Empires (Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press, 1982), 341–46Google Scholar.

91 Downing (fn. 47).

92 Ibid.; Gagliardo (fn. 10); Barraclough (fn. 10), 376–80; Cipolla, Carl, ed., The Fontana Economic History of Europe: The Sixteenth and Seventeenth Centuries (Glasgow: William Collins Sons, 1974)Google Scholar; Strauss, Gerald, Law, Resistance, and the State: The Opposition to Roman Law in Reformation (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1986)CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Moeller (fn. 60); Carsten (fn. 75), 165–78.

93 Parker (fn. 47,1976), 206; Roberts (fn. 16,1967), 78.

94 Parker (fn. 47,1976), 206; Israel (fn. 10), 106–230; DeVries, Jan, The Dutch Rural Economy in Golden Age, 1500—1700 (New Haven: Yale University Press, 1974)Google Scholar; Pirenne, Henri, Early Democracies the Low Countries: Urban Society and Political Conflict in the Middle Ages and Renaissance (New Harper and Row, 1963)Google Scholar; Smit, J. W., “The Netherlands Revolution,” in Forster, R. and Greene, J. P., eds., Preconditions of Revolution in Early Modern Europe (Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1970)Google Scholar; Geyl (fn. 10).

95 Parker (fn. 47, 1976), 206; Bonney, Richard, Political Change in France under Richelieu and Mazarin, 1624—1661 (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1978)Google Scholar; idem, The King's Debts: Finance Politics in France, 1589—1661 (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1981)Google Scholar; idem, Society and Government France under Richelieu andMazarin, 1624–1661 (London: Collier-Macmillan, 1988)Google Scholar; Church (fn. 16), 81–102, 283–340; Elliott (fn. 77), 11–29; Wolfe, Martin, The Fiscal System of Renaissance France Haven: Yale University Press. 1972)Google Scholar; Porter (fn. 24), 74; Tapie, Victor L., France in the Age of Louis XIII and Richelieu, trans. Lockie, D. McN. (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1984)Google Scholar; Briggs, Robin, Early Modern France, 1560–1715 (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1977)Google Scholar; Buisseret, David, Sully and the Growth of Centralized Government in France, 1598–1610 (London: Eyre and Spottiswoode, 1968)Google Scholar.

96 Parker (fn. 47,1976), 206.

97 Elliott, H., Imperial Spain, 1469–1716 (London: Edward Arnold, 1963)Google Scholar; Elliott (fn. 90); Kamen, Henry, Spain 1469–1714: A Society in Conflict (London: Longman, 1983)Google Scholar; Elliott, J. H., Richelieu Olivares (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1984)Google Scholar.

98 See Huntington, Samuel, The Clash of Civilizations and the Remaking of World Order (New York Simon and Schuster, 1996)Google Scholar; Juergensmeyer, Mark, The New Cold War? Religious Nationalism the Secular State (Berkeley: University of California Press, 1993)Google Scholar; Barber, Benjamin, Jihad vs. McWorld (New York: Times Books, 1995)Google Scholar.