Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-vdxz6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-23T07:04:18.009Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Politics in the Post-Military State: Some Reflections on the Pakistani Experience

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 July 2011

Gerald A. Heeger
Gerald A. Heeger
Affiliation:
Adelphi University
Get access

Abstract

The possibilities of an end to military rule in developing states and of a postmilitary era in these states have only recently started to receive some consideration. In general, movement away from military control of politics is perceived as a matter of choice on the part of military elites and as a question of gradually expanding participation so as not to outstrip the slow accrual of extrabureaucratic power. Pakistan's experiences since 1971 suggest another pattern of transition from military-dominated to civiliandominated politics. Pakistan has been characterized by suddenly expanded participation and by the new civilian leadership's use of demobilization and patrimonial strategies to curtail this participation. Such strategies, patrimonialism in particular, have “dedevelopmental” consequences for the political system.

Type
Research Note
Information
World Politics , Volume 29 , Issue 2 , January 1977 , pp. 242 - 262
Copyright
Copyright © Trustees of Princeton University 1977

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 See, for example, Nordlinger, Eric, “Soldiers in Mufti: The Impact of Military Rule Upon Economic and Social Change in Non-Western States,” American Political Science Review, Vol. 64 (December 1970), 1131–48CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Willner, Ann Ruth, “Perspectives on Military Elites as Rulers and Wielders of Power,” Journal of Comparative Administration, 11 (November 1970), 261–76CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Welch, Claude Jr., “The African Military and Political Development,” in Bienen, Henry, ed., The Military and Modernization (Chicago: Aldine Press 1971)Google Scholar; and Heeger, Gerald A., The Politics of Underdevelopment (New York: St. Martin's Press 1974), 107–32Google Scholar.

2 Bienen, and Morell, , “Transition from Military Rule: Thailand's Experience,” in Kelleher, Catherine M., ed., Political-Military Systems: Comparative Perspectives (Beverly Hills, Calif.: Sage Publications 1974), 4Google Scholar.

3 See Heeger (fn. i), 115–19.

4 Finer, , The Man on Horseback (New York: Praeger 1962), 243Google Scholar.

5 Bienen and Morell (fn. 2), 4.

6 Welch, “Personalism and Corporatism in African Armies,” in Kelleher (fn. 2), 137.

7 Ibid. The quote is from Janowitz, , The Military in the Political Development of New Nations (Chicago: University of Chicago Press 1964), 68Google Scholar.

8 Welch, Claude E. Jr. and Smith, Arthur K., Military Role and Rule (North Scituate, Mass.: Duxbury Press 1973), 16Google Scholar.

9 Pye, Lucian W., “Armies in the Process of Modernization,” in Johnson, John, ed., The Role of the Military in Underdeveloped Countries (Princeton: Princeton University Press 1962)Google Scholar; Henry Bienen, “The Background to the Contemporary Study of Militaries and Modernization,” in Bienen (fn. 1), 1–34.

10 Welch, , “Cincinnatus in Africa: The Possibility of Military Withdrawal from Politics,” in Lofchie, Michael, ed., The State of Nations: Constraints on Development in Independent Africa (Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press 1971), 219Google Scholar.

11 Welch, , “The Dilemmas of Military Withdrawal from Politics: Some Considerations from Tropical Africa,” African Studies Review, XVII (April 1974), 217–18Google Scholar.

12 Welch (fn. 10). See also Lerner, Daniel and Robinson, Richard D., “Swords and Ploughshares: The Turkish Army as a Modernizing Force,” World Politics, XIII (October 1960), 19–44CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

13 Welch (fn. 11), 219.

14 Bienen and Morell (fn. 2), 21.

15 Ibid., 22.

16 Yalman, Nur, “Intervention and Extrication: The Officer Corps in the Turkish Crisis,” in Bienen, Henry, ed., The Military Intervenes (New York: Russell Sage Foundation 1968), 127–44Google Scholar.

17 Khan, Mohammad Ayub, Friends, Not Masters (New York: Oxford University Press 1967), 70Google Scholar.

18 On Ayub's political system, see Ziring, Lawrence, The Ayub Era: Politics in Pakistan, 1958–1969 (Syracuse, N.Y.: Syracuse University Press 1971)Google Scholar.

19 For elaboration on this phenomenon in military regimes in general, see Heeger (fn. 1), 118–20.

20 On the “Basic Democracies,” see Ziring (fn. 18), throughout.

21 Burki, , “The Politics of Economic Decision-making During the Bhutto Period,” Asian Survey, XIV (December 1974), 1131–32Google Scholar.

22 The violence of this period is discussed in Burki, Shahid Javed, “Ayub's Fall: A Socio-Economic Explanation,” Asian Survey, XII (March 1972), 201–12CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

23 See LaPorte, Robert Jr., “Succession in Pakistan: Continuity and Change in a Garrison State,” Asian Survey, IX (November 1969), 842–62CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

24 This argument is elaborated upon in Heeger, “The Military and Internal Security Policy in India and Pakistan: Some Reflections on the Relationships Between Political Systems, Policy-Making, and Policy Outcomes,” paper presented at the Western Political Science Association Convention, Seattle, Washington, March 1975. For a detailed study of the Yahya period, see Ziring, Lawrence, “Pakistan: The Yahya Khan Interregnum,” Asian Affairs, 1 (July/August 1974), 402–20CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

25 The elections are surveyed and analyzed in Baxter, Craig, “Pakistan Votes, 1970,” Asian Survey, XI (March 1971), 197–218CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

26 Heeger, Gerald A., “Socialism in Pakistan,” in Desfosses, Helen and Levesque, Jacques, eds., Socialism in the Third World (New York: Praeger 1975), 295–99Google Scholar.

27 Weber, Max, The Theory of Social Economic Organization, translated by Talcott Parsons (New York: Free Press 1957), 347, 341Google Scholar.

28 For a discussion of patrimonial patterns of rule in underdeveloped states, see Roth, Guenther, “Personal Rulership, Patrimonialism, and Empire-Building in the New States,” World Politics, XX (January 1968), 194–206CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

29 Shor, Edgar L., “The Thai Bureaucracy,” Administrative Science Quarterly, V (June 1960), 70, 77Google Scholar.

30 For an excellent survey of the “squirarchy” that underlay Punjab's patrimonially based politics, see Baxter, Craig, “The People's Party Vs. the Punjab ‘Feudalists,’” Journal of Asian and African Studies, VIII (July/October 1973), 166–89CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

31 The new civil service structure is embodied in the Civil Servants Ordinance, 1973 (XIV of 1973); Service Tribunals Ordinance, 1973 (XV of 1973); Federal Public Service Ordinance, 1973 (XVI of 1973); Orders published by the Cabinet Secretariat (August 22, 1973); Civil Servants Act, 1973; Federal Public Service Commission Act, 1973; and Cabinet Secretarial Memoranda of September 14, 1973, and November 20, 1973. See also, Ziring, Lawrence and LaPorte, Robert Jr., “The Pakistan Bureaucracy: Two Views,” Asian Survey, XIV (December 1974), 1086–1103CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

32 Bhutto stressed the need for civilian control over the military repeatedly during this period. See in particular Dilip Mukherjee's interview with Bhutto, March 1972, reprinted in Institute of Defense Studies and Analyses, News Review on South Asia, 59, 64–66.

33 In press interviews, Khurshid Hasan Meer (formerly Minister Without Portfolio, Government of Pakistan, and charged with supervision of bureaucracy reforms between December 1973 and February 1974), and Bhutto repeatedly stressed the need for “reorienting” the bureaucracy to “fit” the government's political objectives. See, for example, Meer's, Hasan interview in Pakistan Times (Lahore), September 18, 1973Google Scholar.

34 After the first wave of ousters, a sizable number of those who had been removed were restored to their positions. Although the government needed these men, this sequence very effectively communicated to the bureaucrats the desirability of following the regime's dictates if they wished to remain secure.

35 This section is based upon data collected in interviews with PPP figures, conducted by the author at the national, provincial, and local levels between August 1973 and June 1974.

36 Burki (fn. 21), 1139–40.

37 See Hopkins, Raymond F., Political Roles in a New State: Tanzania's First Decade (New Haven: Yale University Press 1971), 43Google Scholar.

38 On the concept of role expansion, see Lissak, Moshe, “Modernization and Role Expansion of the Military in Developing Countries,” Comparative Studies in Society and History, IX (April 1967), 233–55CrossRefGoogle Scholar.