Article contents
National Interest, International Organization, and American Foreign Policy
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 18 July 2011
Extract
American foreign policy has recently become a favorite target-area for attacks upon an alleged moralizing and legalistic habit which ignores or condemns national interest. The criticism runs the whole gamut of our relations with the world outside, focusing with final virulence upon our effort to find peace in the United Nations. It covers most of the nation's history, tracing the decline from “realism” to moralistic fantasy back to the moment when the genius of the Federalists began to be corrupted by Jeffersonian sentimentalism. The vast complex of today's foreign relations furnishes innumerable points of assault. A folly of self-righteousness has led us—so the indictment reads—into tragic error in China, in Korea, in the Near and Middle East, even (though here some of the accusers desert) in Europe. We give quixotically where we should sell; but our purse-strings are tied with moral scruples where we should be lavish. Shrinking from the open use of power, we enter into wasteful and entangling alliances where we should keep a free hand. Crusading in the name of democracy and disregarding the limits of our resources, we undertake to assist peoples anywhere to establish free governments in the face of intervention from Moscow. We take up arms for the utopian aims of an international organization set up in postwar zeal for a new era and maintained at our expense. A course in this literature of calamity leaves us wondering how the nation has survived. It sounds like the dirge for a fallen empire.
- Type
- Research Article
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © Trustees of Princeton University 1952
References
1 New Haven, Conn., 1950, p. 23.
2 Ibid., p. 46.
3 Ibid., p. 41.
4 For a general discussion of this subject, see Almond, Gabriel A., The American People and Foreign Policy, New York, 1950.Google Scholar
- 1
- Cited by