No CrossRef data available.
We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.
We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 18 July 2011
The war in Indo-China, sinister, bloody, and seemingly endless, presents as curious a farrago of paradoxes and incongruities as any in recent military history. For one thing, its character has changed from a colonial to a civil war. It has changed from a war fought for the restitution of French sovereignty by a professional, traditionally colonial army to a war in which the same army is still fighting, but now side by side with native troops for the avowed purpose of securing the former colony's independence against the threat of Communist imperialism. Thus, in a sense, it has also become an international war, with Indo-China one of the areas ignited by the friction between the free and the Communist worlds. Indeed, it may be argued that the French forces in Indo-China are fighting the flank action of another and greater conflict, the main line of resistance of which lies somewhere between the 38th Parallel and the Yalu River in Korea.
1 “Background to Chinese Intervention in Korea,” Times Weekly Edition (London), August 15, 1951.
2 “The Communist Threat to Southeast Asia,” Doc., Ambassade de France, Service de Presse et d'Information, April 1950.
3 Raphael-Leygues, J., “L'Union française au petit bonheur ou la stratégie française depuis cinq ans,” Revue politique et parlementaire, 52e Année, No. 602 (November 1950), 242–51.Google Scholar See also Ed. Frédéric-Dupont, Deputé de Paris, “Faut-il rester en Indochine?”, ibid., No. 595 (February 1950), 113–19.
4 Raphael-Leygues, , loc. cit., p. 244.Google Scholar
5 Clementin, J. R., “The Nationalist Dilemma in Viet Nam,” Pacific Affairs, XXIII, No. 3 (September 1950), 294–310.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
6 Quoted in Payne, Robert, Red Storm over Asia, New York, 1951, p. 250.Google Scholar
7 ibid., p. 193.
8 ibid.
9 L'Année politique 1949, Paris, 1950, p. 84.
10 Raphael-Leygues, , loc. cit., p. 249.Google Scholar
11 New York Times, October 20, 1950.
12 L'Echo du Viet Nam, September 6, 1950.
13 ibid., and ff.
14 On French public opinion regarding Bao Dai, see Hammer, Ellen J., “French Views Clash on Indo-China Policy” Foreign Policy Bulletin, XXIX (July 14, 1950), 3–4.Google Scholar
15 Le Monde, February 11, 1950.
16 See Le Monde, February 12–13, 1950.
17 New York Times, January 3, 1951.
18 ibid., November 10, 1949.
19 Le Monde, June 25–26, 1950.
20 See Soustelle, Jacques, “Indo-China and Korea: One Front,” Foreign Affairs, XXIX, No. 1 (October 1950), 56–66;CrossRefGoogle Scholar “Indo-China: A Key to the Far East,” Supplement to L'Economie, No. 294 (March 29, 1950); and Indo-China (A French Point of View), Paris, Nouvelles Editions Latines, 1950.
21 Doc. No. 44, Ambassade de France, Service de Presse et d'Information, May 29, 1951.
22 Clementin, , loc. cit., pp. 296–97.Google Scholar
23 New York Times, March 9, 1950.
24 New York Times, September 14, 1951; and Doc. No. 61, Ambassade de France, Service de Presse et d'Information, September 1951.
25 Times (London), March 7, 1951.
26 Colonel, Marchand, L'Indochine, dans le cadre de l'Asie et ses problèmes actuels, Paris, 1949, p. 204.Google Scholar
27 Quoted in Milton Sacks, “The Strategy of Communism in Southeast Asia,” Pacific Affairs, XXIII, No. 3 (September 1950), 232–33.Google Scholar
28 Doc. No. 26, Ambassade de France, Service de Presse et d'Information, November 10, 1950. For further detail, see London Times, March 8, 1951.
29 New York Times, October 2, 1951.
30 Coughlin, Richard J., “The Republic and Viet Nam,” Far Eastern Survey, XIX, No. 19 (November 8, 1950), 203–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
31 New York Times, February 22, 23, 1951.
32 Doc. No. 33, Ambassade de France, Service de Presse et d'Information, January 1951.
33 Doc. No. 52, Ambassade de France, Service de Presse et d'Information, July 19, 1951.
34 Doc. No. 29, ibid., September 5, 1951.
35 New York Times, October 2, 1951.
36 ibid., January 13, 1951.
37 Times Weekly Edition (London), August 8, 1951.
38 ibid., August 22, 29, 1951.