Article contents
The 19th-Century International System: Changes in the Structure
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 13 June 2011
Abstract
Conventional accounts of the 19th-century international system describe it as a conservative restoration of the 18th-century system and account for the general stability of the 19th century primarily on the basis of the actors' peaceful dispositions. They fail to recognize or explain the profound structural changes in 19th-century politics. Problems that could not be successfully dealt with in the 18th century were solved or managed by 19th-century statesmen by means of three new systemic arrangements: a system of intertwined guarantees and duties for the great powers; arrangements for shielding European politics from extra-European quarrels; and a network of intermediary bodies, separating and linking the great powers, to serve as buffers and spheres of influence.
- Type
- Research Article
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © Trustees of Princeton University 1986
References
1 E.g., Gulick, Edward V., Europe's Classical Balance of Power (Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 1955)Google Scholar; Rohden, Peter R., Die klassische Diplomatic von Kaunitz bis Mettemich (Leipzig: Koehler & Amelang, 1939)Google Scholar.
2 Bridge, F. Roy and Bullen, Roger, The Great Powers and the European States System 1815–1914 (London: Longman, 1980)Google Scholar.
3 Polišensky, Josef V., War and Society in Europe, 1618–1648 (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1978)CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Rabb, Theodore, The Struggle for Stability in Early Modern Europe (New York: Oxford University Press, 1975)Google Scholar.
4 Duchardt, Heinz, Gleichgewicht der Kra'fte, Convenance, Europäisches Konzert (Darmstadt: Wissenschaftliche Buchgesellschaft, 1976)Google Scholar; Hatton, Ragnhild, George I, Elector and King (Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1978)Google Scholar; Horn, David B., Great Britain and Europe in the Eighteenth Century (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1967)Google Scholar; Langford, Paul, The Eighteenth Century, 1688–1815 (New York: A. and C. Black, 1976)Google Scholar; McKay, Derek and Scott, Hamish M., The Rise of the Great Powers 1648–1815 (London and New York: Longman, 1983)Google Scholar; Zeller, Gaston, Les temps modernes, 2 vols. (Paris: Hachette, 1953–55)Google Scholar.
5 Bohme, Helmut, Deutschlands Weg zur Grossmacht, 2d ed. (Cologne and Berlin: Kiepenheuer & Witsch, 1972)Google Scholar; Brandt, Harm-Hinrich, Der österreichische Neoabsolutismus, 2 vols. (Gottingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht, 1978)Google Scholar.
6 Baumgart, Winfried, Der Frieden von Paris 1856 (Munich and Vienna: R. Oldenbourg, 1972)Google Scholar; Schroeder, Paul W., Austria, Great Britain and the Crimean War (Ithaca, NY, and London: Cornell University Press, 1972)Google Scholar; Curtiss, John S, Russia's Crimean War (Durham, NC: Duke University Press, 1979)Google Scholar; Rich, Norman, Why the Crimean War? (Hanover, NH, and London: University Press of New England, 1985)Google Scholar.
7 Taylor, , Rumours of Wars (London: H. Hamilton, 1952), 30–40Google Scholar.
8 Nolfo, Ennio di, Europa e Italia nel 1855–18 56 (Rome: Istituto per la storia del Risorgimento italiano, 1967)Google Scholar.
9 Schroeder, Paul W., “The Lost Intermediaries: The Impact of 1870 on the European System,” International History Review 6 (February 1984), 1–27CrossRefGoogle Scholar.
10 Valsecchi, Franco, L'unificazione italiana e la politico europea (Milan: Istituto per gli studi di politica internazionale, 1939)Google Scholar; Marcelli, Umberto, Cavour, diplomatico 1856–1859 (Bologna: A. Forni, 1961)Google Scholar; Omodeo, Adolfo, L'opera politica del conte di Cavour (1848–1857) (Milan and Naples: R. Ricciardi, 1968)Google Scholar; Engel-Janosi, Friedrich, “L' ‘Ultimatum' austriaco del 1859,” Rassegna storica del Risorgimento 24 (September and October 1937), 1393–1425, 1565–1600Google Scholar.
11 Burckhardt, Helmut, Deutschland, England, Frankreich (Munich: W. Fink, 1970)Google Scholar; Millman, Richard, British Foreign Policy and the Coming of the Franco-Prussian War (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1965)Google Scholar; Beyrau, Dietrich, Russische Orientpolitik und die Entstehung des Deutschen Kaiserreiches 1866 bis 1870/71 (Munich: Osteuropa-Institut, 1974)Google Scholar; Lutz, Heinrich, Österreich-Ungarn und die Gründung des Deutschen Reiches (Frankfurt: Propyläen, 1979)Google Scholar.
12 Smith, Denis Mack, Cavour and Garibaldi, 1860 (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1954)Google Scholar, and Victor Emmanuel, Cavour, and the Risorgimento (London: Oxford University Press, 1971)Google Scholar; Gall, Lothar, Bismarck der weisse Revolutions (Frankfurt: Propyläen, 1980)Google Scholar.
13 See, for example, Kennan, George F., The Decline of Bismark's European Order (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1979)Google Scholar; Mitchell, Allan, Bismarck and the French Nation, 1848–1890 (New York: Pegasus, 1971)Google Scholar.
14 Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1954.
15 E.g., Stadtmiiller, Georg, “Die russische Weltmacht und ihr Rückzug (1783–1867),” in Stadtmüller, Grundfragen der europäischen Geschichte (Munich and Vienna: R. Oldenbourg, 1965)Google Scholar.
16 Hillgruber, , Bismarcks Aussenpolitik (Freiburg: Rombach, 1972)Google Scholar.
17 Gall (fn. 12).
18 Dehio, , The Precarious Balance (New York: Knopf, 1962)Google Scholar, trans. Fullman, Charles, from Gleichgewicht oder Hegemonie (Krefeld: Scherpe, 1948)Google Scholar.
19 Levy, Jack S., War in the Modem Great Power System, 1495–1975 (Lexington: University of Kentucky Press, 1983), 88–89Google Scholar. I have omitted the wars of 1792–1815 from the calculations, even though historically they belong to the 18th century, to meet the objection that World War I should then be included for the 19th century. In any case, the discrepancy between the two centuries is no statistical quirk caused by a preponderance of deaths in one particular war or period. Each century shows a comparable pattern of initial stability (1715–40 and 1815–53), followed by upheaval (1740–63 and 1853–71) and a return to relative stability (1763–92 and 1871–1914). In each period the ratio of battlefield deaths is roughly the same.
20 Griewank, Karl, Der Wiener Kongress und die europäische Restauration, 2d ed. (Leipzig: Koehler & Amelang, 1954)Google Scholar; Bourquin, Maurice, Histoire de la Sainte Alliance (Geneva: Librairie de l'Université Georg, 1954)Google Scholar; Elrod, Richard B., “The Concert of Europe: A Fresh Look at an International System,” World Politics 28 (January 1976), 159–74CrossRefGoogle Scholar.
21 Duchardt (fn. 4).
22 For good discussions of how and why this happened, with particular reference to the Seven Years' War, see Mediger, Walther, Moskaus Weg nach Europa (Braunschweig: G. Westermann, 1952)Google Scholar; Kunisch, Johannes, Staatsverfassung und Mädchtepolitik (Berlin: Duncker & Humblot, 1979)Google Scholar; and Müller, Michael G., “Russland und der Siebenjährige Krieg. Beitrag zu einer Kontroverse,” Jahrbücher für Geschichte Osteuropas 28 (No. 2, 1980), 198–219Google Scholar.
23 For example, Klaus Zernack shows how Russia's expansion in its northern wars and the first partition of Poland were in a sense system-preserving actions: “Das Zeitalter der nordischen Kriege von 1558 bis 1809 als frühneuzeitliche Geschichtsepoche,” Zeitschrift für historische Forschung (No. 1, 1974), 55”79Google Scholar and “Negative Polenpolitik als Grundlage deutschrussischer Diplomatic in der Mächtepolitik des 18. Jahrhunderts,” in Russland und Deutschland. Festschrift für Georg von Rauch (Stuttgart: E. Klett, 1974), 144–59Google Scholar.
24 Rein's comments are quoted in Groote, Wolfgang von, ed., Napoleon I und die Staatenwelt seiner Zeit (Freiburg: Rombach, 1969), 198–99Google Scholar.
25 See, for example, Pirenne, Jacques-Henri, La, Sainte-Alliance, organisation européenne de la paix mondiale, 2 vols. (Neuchâtel: Editions de la Baconnière, 1946–49)Google Scholar; Ingram, Edward, Commitment to Empire (New York: Oxford University Press, 1981)Google Scholar.
26 Gillard, David, The Struggle for Asia 1828–1914 (London: Methuen, 1977)Google Scholar; Bourne, Kenneth, Palmerston: The Early Years, 1784–1841 (New York: Macmillan, 1982)Google Scholar; Yapp, Malcolm E., Strategies of British India (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1980)Google Scholar.
27 Ingle, Harold N., Nesselrode and the Russian Rapprochement with Britain, 1836–1843 (Berkeley: University of California Press, 1976)Google Scholar.
28 Ibid.; Kossok, Manfred, Im Schatten der Heiligen Allianz ([East] Berlin: Akademie-Verlag, 1964)Google Scholar; Bartley, Russell H., Imperial Russia and the Struggle for Latin American Independence, 1808–1828 (Austin: Institute for Latin American Studies, University of Texas, 1978)Google Scholar.
29 Bullen, Roger, Palmerston, Guizot and the Collapse of the Entente Cordiale (London: Athlone, 1974)Google Scholar; Guyot, Raymond, La première Entente Cordiale (Paris: F. Rieder, 1926)Google Scholar; Johnson, Douglas, Guizot: Aspects of French History, 1787–1874 (London: Routledge & Keagan Paul, 1963)Google Scholar.
30 Tarling, Nicholas, Anglo-Dutch Rivalry in the Malay World, 1780–1824 (London and New York: Cambridge University Press, 1962)Google Scholar, and Imperial Britain in South-East Asia (Kuala Lumpur and New York: Oxford University Press, 1975)Google Scholar.
31 Plumb, John H., Sir Robert Walpole, 2 vols. (Boston: Houghton-Mifflin, 1956–61)Google Scholar; Browning, Reed, The Duke of Newcastle (New Haven and London: Yale University Press, 1975)Google Scholar; Higgonet, Patrice, “The Origins of the Seven Years' War,” journal of Modern History 40 (March 1968), 57–90CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Clayton, T. R., “The Duke of Newcastle, the Earl of Halifax, and the American Origins of the Seven Years' War,” Historical journal 24 (September 1981), 571–603CrossRefGoogle Scholar.
32 Kelly, John B., Britain and the Persian Gulf, 1795–1800 (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1968)Google Scholar; Marston, Thomas E., Britain's Imperial Role in the Red Sea Area, 1800–1878 (Hamden, CT: Shoestring Press, 1961)Google Scholar.
33 Renier, Gustaaf J., Great Britain and the Establishment of the Kingdom of the Netherlands, 1813–1815 (London: George Allen & Unwin, 1930)Google Scholar.
34 Gruner, Wolf D., “Die belgisch-luxemburgische Frage im Spannungsfeld europäischer Politik 1830–1839,” Francia 5 (1977), 316Google Scholar.
35 Boogrrian, Johan C., Nederland en de Duitse Bond, 1815–1851, 2 vols. (Groningen: C. Wolters, 1955)Google Scholar.
36 See, for example, Dunk, Hermann von der, Der deutsche Vormärz und Belgien 1830/48 (Wiesbaden: F. Steiner, 1966)Google Scholar.
37 Zernack (fn. 23); Brandt, Otto, “Das Problem der ‘Ruhe des Nordens' im 18. Jahrhundert,” Historische Zeitschrift 140 (No. 3, 1929), 550–64CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Nordmann, Claude, Grandeur et liberté de la Suède (1660–1792) (Paris: Béatrice-Nauwelaerts, 1971)Google Scholar.
38 Martin, William, La Suisse et t'Europe 1813–1814 (Lausanne: Payot, 1931)Google Scholar.
39 Aretin, Karl O. von, Heiliges Römisches Reich 1776–1806, 2 vols. (Wiesbaden: F. Steiner, 1967), and Vom Deutschen Reich zum Deutschen Bund (Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht, 1980)Google Scholar.
40 Huber, Ernst R., Deutsche Verfassungsgeschichte seit 1789, 1, 2d ed. (Stuttgart: E. Kohlhammer, 1967)Google Scholar; Kraehe, Enno E., Metternich's German Policy, 2 vols. (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1963–83)Google Scholar.
41 Ibbeken, Rudolf, Preussen 1807–13 (Cologne: Grote, 1970)Google Scholar; Droz, Jacques, L'Allemagne et la Révolution française (Paris: Presses universitaires de France, 1949)Google Scholar.
42 Blanning, Timothy C. W., The French Revolution in Germany (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1983)Google Scholar.
43 Faber, Karl-Georg, Die Rheinlande zwischen Restauration und Revolution (Wiesbaden: F. Steiner, 1966)Google Scholar; Fehrenbach, Elisabeth, Traditionelle Gesellschaft und revolutionäres Recht (Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht, 1978)Google Scholar; Weis, Eberhard, “Der Einfluss der französischen Revolution und des Empire auf die Reformen in den siiddeutschen Staaten” Francia 1 (1973), 569–83Google Scholar, and “Bayern und Frankreich in der Zeit des Konsulats und des Ersten Empire (1799–1815)” Historische Zeitschrift 237 (December 1983), 559–95Google Scholar.
44 See, for example, Quint, Wolfgang, Souveränitätsbegriff und Souveränitätspolitik in Bayern (Berlin: Duncker & Humblot, 1971)Google Scholar; Aretin, Karl O. von, Bayerns Wegzum Souveränen Staat (Munich: Beck, 1976)Google Scholar; and Hölzle, Erwin, Württemberg im Zeitalter Napoleons und der deutschen Erhebung (Stuttgart and Berlin: W. Kohlhammer, 1937)Google Scholar. For evidence of a countervailing force, see Walker, Mack, German Home Towns (Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 1971)Google Scholar.
45 Chroust, Anton, ed., Gesandtschaftsberichte aus München, 1814–1848. Abteilung I: Die Berichte des französischen Gesandten, 5 vols. (Munich: Akademie der Wissenschaften, 1935–41)Google Scholar; Hammer, Karl, Die französische Diplomatic der Restauration und Deutschland, 1814–1830 (Stuttgart: A. Hiersemann, 1930)Google Scholar.
46 Poidevin, Raymond and Sieburg, Heinz-Otto, eds., Aspects des relations franco-allemandes 1830–1848 (Metz: Centre de recherches relations internationales de l'Université de Metz, 1978)Google Scholar.
47 Grossman, Karl, “Metternichs Plan eines italienischen Bundes,” Historische Blätter 4 (1931), 37–76Google Scholar; Schroeder, Paul W., Metternich's Diplomacy at Its Zenith, 1820–1823 (Austin; University of Texas Press, 1962)Google Scholar; Reinerman, Alan, Metternich and the Papacy in the Age of Metternich, I (Washington, DC: Catholic University Press, 1980)Google Scholar.
48 Roider, Karl A. Jr., Austria's Eastern Question, 1700–1790 (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1982)Google Scholar.
49 Petropoulos, John A., Politics and Statecraft in the Kingdom of Greece, 1833–1843 (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1968)CrossRefGoogle Scholar.
50 Davies, Norman, God's Playground: A History of Poland, II (New York: Columbia University Press, 1982)Google Scholar; Wandycz, Piotr S., The Lands of Partitioned Poland, 1795–1918 (Seattle: University of Washington Press, 1974)Google Scholar.
- 40
- Cited by