Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-4rdpn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-03T02:19:30.871Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

It is not Taylorism: Mechanisms of Work Intensification in the Provision of Gynaecological Services in a NHS Hospital

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 June 1999

Stephen Ackroyd
Affiliation:
Department of Behaviour in Organisations, The Management School, Lancaster University, Lancaster, LA1 4YX, England
Sharon Bolton
Affiliation:
Department of Behaviour in Organisations, The Management School, Lancaster University, Lancaster, LA1 4YX, England
Get access

Abstract

The development of a managed National Health Service (NHS) has been a central element of government policy for a substantial part of the last two decades. Within months of taking office in 1979, the first Thatcher administration repudiated the idea of a centrally planned and administered NHS in favour of a declared policy of managed localism (Klein1995: 124–26; Pollitt 1993: 68–9). However, a somewhat more considered process of policy formation was soon set in train with the commissioning of the Griffiths enquiry and, following the acceptance of its conclusions in 1983, with the introduction of what was called ‘general management’. Since the middle of the 1980s, the management which Griffiths recommended (which allocates considerable decision-making independence to managers within a framework of prescribed budgets) has been consolidated and developed.

Type
NOTES AND ISSUES
Copyright
1999 BSA Publications Ltd

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)