Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-tf8b9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-29T17:14:33.112Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Could the space probe Philae© be energized remotely?

Part of: Wireless Power Transfer in Space Applications

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  16 May 2019

Alessandra Costanzo Open the ORCID record for Alessandra Costanzo [Opens in a new window] ,
Luca Roselli ,
Apostolos Georgiadis ,
Nuno Borges Carvalho ,
Alexandru Takacs ,
Pier Giorgio Arpesi  and
Rodolfo Martins
Alessandra Costanzo*
Affiliation:
University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy
Luca Roselli
Affiliation:
University of Perugia, Perugia, Italy
Apostolos Georgiadis
Affiliation:
Heriot-Watt University, Scotland, UK
Nuno Borges Carvalho
Affiliation:
Dep. Electrónica e Telecomunicações, Instituto de Telecomunicações, Universidade de Aveiro, Aveiro, Portugal
Alexandru Takacs
Affiliation:
LAAS – CNRS, Toulouse, France
Pier Giorgio Arpesi
Affiliation:
LEONARDO, Italy
Rodolfo Martins
Affiliation:
EVOLEO Technologies, Maia, Portugal
*
Corresponding author: Alessandra Costanzo Email: [email protected]
Get access

Abstract

Space probes suffer from a fundamental problem, which is the limited energy available for their operation. Energy supply is essential for continuous operation and ultimately the most important sub-system for its sustainable functioning. Considering, for instance, the last space probe put on Comet 67P/Churyumov–Gerasimenko, called “Philae”, which was sent by Rosetta (http://www.esa.int/Our_Activities/Space_Science/Rosetta), to operate and to monitor comet activity, its operation was jeopardized due to the fact that it landed on a shadowed zone (no direct sunlight). Since its operational energy was only based on solar harvesters, the energy for its operation was limited by solar energy availability. In this paper a study on a viable alternative based on wireless power transmission is presented and discussed at the system level. It is proved that, using current technology, it is possible to create alternatives or supplement to existing power sources such as solar panels to power up these important space probes and to secure their operation.

Keywords

Energy harvestingSpace probesNear-fieldFar-field
Type
Review Article
Information
Wireless Power Transfer , Volume 6 , Issue 2 , September 2019 , pp. 154 - 160
Check for updates
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2019

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1.Brown, W.C.; Eves, E.E.: Beamed microwave power transmission and its application to space. IEEE Trans. Microwave Theory Tech., 40 (6) (1992), 1239–1250.Google Scholar
2.York, R.A.; Popovic, Z.B. (eds.): Active and Quasi-Optical Arrays for Solid-State Power Combining, John Wiley and Sons, NJ, USA, 1997 (Chapters 1 and 2).Google Scholar
3.Reiche, E. et al. : Space Fed arrays for overlapping feed apertures, German Microwave Conference, Hamburg-Harburg, Germany, 2008, 1–4.Google Scholar
4.Lipworth, G.S. et al. : A Large Planar Holographic Reflectarray for Fresnel-Zone Microwave Wireless Power Transfer at 5.8 GHz, 2018 IEEE/MTT-S International Microwave Symposium – IMS, Philadelphia, PA, 2018, 964–967.Google Scholar
5.Balanis, C.A.: Antenna Theory: Analysis and Design, 4th edn., John Wiley & Sons, NJ, USA, 2016.Google Scholar
6.Leclerc, C.; Romier, M.; Aubert, H.; Annabi, A.: Ka-Band multiple feed per beam focal array using interleaved couplers. IEEE Trans. Microw. Theory Tech., 62 (6) (2014), 1322–1329.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
7.Mangenot, C.: Space antenna challenges for future missions, key techniques and technologies, in Space Antenna Handbook, Imbriale, W.A., Gao, S.S., Boccia, L., Eds. John Wiley & Sons, Ltd, Chichester, UK, 2012, 695–737.Google Scholar
8.Rao, S.K.: Design and analysis of multiple-beam reflector antennas. IEEE Antennas Propag. Mag., 41 (4) (1999), 53–59.Google Scholar
9.Lepeltier, P.; Bosshard, P.; Maurel, J., Labourdette, C.; Navarre, G.; David, J.: “Recent achievements and future trends for multiple beam telecommunication antennas,” in 2012 15 International Symposium on Antenna Technology and Applied Electromagnetics, 2012, 1–6.Google Scholar
10.Schneider, M.; Hartwanger, C.; Wolf, H.: Antennas for multiple spot beam satellites. CEAS Sp. J., 2 (1–4) (2011), 59–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
11.Balling, P.; Mangenot, C.; Roederer, A. G.; Shaped single-feed-per-beam multibeam reflector antenna, in 2006 First European Conference on Antennas and Propagation, 2006, 1–6.Google Scholar
12.Schneider, M.; Hartwanger, C.; Sommer, E.; Wolf, H.: Test results for the multiple spot beam antenna project ‘Medusa’, Proceedings of the Fourth European Conference on Antennas and Propagation, Barcelona, 2010, 1–4.Google Scholar
13.Romier, M.: Multibeam Source, World Patent WO 2013 050517, Apr. 11, 2013.Google Scholar
14.Costanzo, A. et al. : Electromagnetic energy harvesting and wireless power transmission: A unified approach. Proc. IEEE, 102 (11) (2014), 1692, 1711.Google Scholar
15.Roberg, M.; Reveyrand, T.; Ramos, I.; Falkenstein, E.A.; Popovic, Z.: High-Efficiency harmonically terminated diode and transistor rectifiers. IEEE Trans. Microw. Theory Tech., 60 (12) (2012), 4043,4052.CrossRefGoogle Scholar