Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-2plfb Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-29T00:58:47.054Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Weed Control Demonstration Program in Michigan

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

S. K. Ries
S. K. Ries*
Affiliation:
Dept. of Hort., Michigan State University, East Lansing
Get access

Extract

Most farmers are not taking full advantage of the information available on herbicides and weed control methods. With few exceptions there is too long a delay between the development of a new weed control practice and its use on the average farm. This lag may be attributed to the following factors:

1. Failure of public and commercial extension workers to inform individual farmers.

2. Unsatisfactory experiences by farmers due to improper use of herbicides.

3. Grower unwillingness to try something new without visual proof.

4. General complexity of herbicide usage.

5. Unwillingness of a large number of farmers to be the first to accept a new practice.

Type
Research Article
Information
Weeds , Volume 4 , Issue 4 , October 1956 , pp. 357 - 362
Copyright
Copyright © 1956 Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

2 Members of the Extension Committee were as follows: R. F. Carlson, Department of Horticulture; B. R. Churchill, Department of Farm Crops; B. H. Grigsby, Department of Botany and Plant Pathology; L. V. Nelson, Department of Farm Crops; R. G. White, Department of Agricultural Engineering; and S. K. Ries, Department of Horticulture, Chairman.Google Scholar