Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-r5fsc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T09:57:58.704Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A Three-Year Study of the Effect of Some Phenoxy Herbicides on Cotton

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

W. K. Porter Jr. ,
C. H. Thomas  and
J. B. Baker
W. K. Porter Jr.
Affiliation:
Louisiana Agricultural Experiment Station, Baton Rouge, Louisiana
C. H. Thomas
Affiliation:
Louisiana Agricultural Experiment Station, Baton Rouge, Louisiana
J. B. Baker
Affiliation:
Louisiana Agricultural Experiment Station, Baton Rouge, Louisiana
Get access

Extract

The chlorinated phenoxyalkylcarboxylic acids are extremely valuable in affording a solution to many weed problems. On the other hand, the use of such herbicides may create problems since many crop or ornamental plants which are very sensitive to the phenoxy herbicides may be growing in close proximity to crops or areas in which treatments with such herbicides seems desirable. In the South, cotton may be planted adjacent to crops such as rice, sugarcane or corn or in areas bordering woods, highways or railways. On such areas, the application of phenoxy herbicides may solve the problem of weed control; however, they may create a new problem by causing injury to cotton.

Type
Research Article
Information
Weeds , Volume 7 , Issue 3 , July 1959 , pp. 341 - 348
Copyright
Copyright © 1959 Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

1. Behrens, R., Hall, W. C, and Fisher, C. E. Field responses of cotton to four phenoxy type herbicides. Proc. SWC 8:72–75. 1955.Google Scholar
2. Brown, C. A., Holdeman, Q. L., and Hagood, E. S. Injuries to cotton by 2,4–D. Louisiana Agr. Exp. Sta. Bulletin 426. 1948.Google Scholar
3. Ergle, D. R., and Dunlap, A. A. Response of cotton to 2,4–D. Texas Agr. Exp. Sta. Bulletin 713. 1949.Google Scholar
4. Goodman, V. H. 2,4–D injury to cotton. Mississippi Agr. Exp. Sta. Circular 185. 1953.Google Scholar
5. Goodman, V. H., Ennis, W. B., and Palmer, R. D. Cotton responses to 2,4–D, 2,4,5–T, MCP and related growth regulations. Proc. SWC 8:76–81. 1955.Google Scholar
6. McIlrath, W. J. Cotton-leaf malformations induced by organic phosphate insecticides. Bot. Gaz. 112:221–225. 1950.Google Scholar
7. McIlrath, W. J., Ergle, D. R., and Dunlap, A. A. Persistence of 2,4–D stimulus in cotton plants with reference to its transmission to the seed. Bot. Gaz. 112:511–518. 1951.Google Scholar
8. Watson, A. J. The response of cotton to low rates of 2,4–D, 2,4,5–T, MCP and Silvex. Proc. SWC 8:82–86. 1955.Google Scholar