Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-gb8f7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-29T02:38:34.450Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Studies on Spray Retention by Leaves of Different Plants

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

W. B. Ennis Jr.
Affiliation:
Department of Plant Pathology, State College, Mississippi
Ralph E. Williamson
Affiliation:
Camp Detrick, Maryland
K. P. Dorschner
Affiliation:
Mississippi Agricultural Experiment Station, State College, Mississippi
Get access

Extract

The employment of selective herbicidal sprays to kill or inhibit one or more undesirable plant species growing in close association with desirable species has become a common practice in producing certain crop and pasture species. Many crop and weed plants which are equally inhibited if exposed to certain herbicides during the germination period may show marked differential response when the tops of the same plants are sprayed with the materials. For example, the common small grains and corn are readily inhibited by the herbicide 2,4–dichlorophenoxyacetic acid (2,4–D) if exposed to solutions of the herbicide at the germination stage. Notwithstanding, 2,4–D is widely used in spraying these crop plants at certain stages to control weeds without causing significant damage to the crops. The lack of serious damage to these species from applications of 2,4–D to their tops may be attributed to several factors. Firstly, the spray may be repelled and shed harmlessly to the soil by the crop species and retained by the weedy ones. Secondly, the spray may be retained about equally well by the foliage of all species, but absorption and translocation of the herbicide to susceptible tissues, such as the stem and root apical meristems, may be less efficient in the non-susceptible species than in the susceptible ones. Possible differential accumulation of herbicides at the site of toxic action by susceptible and tolerant plants also may be important. Thirdly, the differential response of plant species to certain herbicidal sprays may be attributable to an inherent physiological capacity of the non-susceptible plant to tolerate the herbicide even in intimate association with the cellular components. Fourthly, some herbicidal materials appear to be readily taken up by the normal absorbing organ, the roots, of plants, but are not absorbed efficiently by the aerial plant parts because of certain physio-chemical relationships and internal morphological barriers. Fifthly, the position of the stem growing point may be a factor influencing the differential response of plants to herbicidal sprays. The apical bud of the stem in most broadleaf plants is usually wet by foliage sprays, whereas the stem bud of grasses is protected by several enveloping leaves. Sixthly, some species may inactivate the herbicide more rapidly than others and hence are not highly responsive.

Type
Papers
Information
Weeds , Volume 1 , Issue 3 , April 1952 , pp. 274 - 286
Copyright
Copyright © 1952 Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

Blackman, G. E. The principles of selective toxicity and the action of selective herbicides. Science Progress 150: 637651. 1950.Google Scholar
Ennis, W. B. Jr., and Boyd, F. T. The response of kidney-bean and soybean plants to aqueous-spray applications of 2,4–dichlorophenoxyacetic acid with and without carbowax. Bot. Gaz. 107: 552559. 1946.Google Scholar
Ennis, W. B. Jr., Boyd, F. T., James, D. T. A simple apparatus for producing droplets of uniform size from small volumes of liquids. Science 112: 434436. 1950.Google Scholar
Fogg, G. E. Quantitative studies on the wetting of leaves by water. Proc. Roy. Soc. B. 134: 503522. 1947.Google ScholarPubMed
Hopp, H., and Linder, P. J. Laboratory studies on glycerin as a supplement in water-soluble herbicidal sprays. Amer. J. Bot. 33: 598600. 1946.Google Scholar
Mitchell, J. W., and Linder, P. J. Absorption and translocation of radioactive 2,4–DI by bean plants as affected by cosolvents and surface agents. Science 112: 5455. 1950.Google Scholar
Rice, E. L. Absorption and translocation of ammonium 2,4–dichlorophenoxyacetate by bean plants. Bot. Gaz. 109: 301314. 1948.Google Scholar
Smith, H. H. Quantitative aspects of aqueous-spray applications of 2,4–dichlorophenoxyacetic acid for herbicidal purposes. Bot. Gaz. 107: 544551. 1946.Google Scholar
Staniforth, D. W., and Loomis, W. E. Surface action in 2,4–D sprays. Science 109: 628629. 1949.Google Scholar