Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-dsjbd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-29T00:50:53.670Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Studies on Herbicidal Absorption and Translocation in Velvet Mesquite Seedlings

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

Herbert M. Hull
Herbert M. Hull*
Affiliation:
Field Crops Research Branch, Agricultural Research Service, U. S. Department of Agriculture, Box 951, Tucson, Arizona
Get access

Extract

The mesquite tree (Prosopis spp.) has been invading southwestern ranges to an alarming degree during the last half century, and has become a serious competitor for available moisture and light with perennial grass—the principal forage of livestock in this area. Its distribution in Arizona, New Mexico, and Texas has been estimated at over 70 million acres. Of the three varieties of mesquite found in these States, velvet mesquite (P. juliflora var. velutina (Woot.) Sarg.) is essentially limited to Arizona, and is the most common variety found therein.

Type
Research Article
Information
Weeds , Volume 4 , Issue 1 , January 1956 , pp. 22 - 42
Copyright
Copyright © 1956 Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

1. Benson, Lyman. The mesquites and screw-beans of the United States. Am. Jour. Bot. 28: 748–754. 1941.Google Scholar
2. Blair, Byron O., and Glendening, George E. Intake and movement of herbicides injected into mesquite. Bot. Gaz. 115: 173–179. 1953.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
3. Blair, , and Fuller, W. H. Translocation of 2,4–dichloro–5–iodophenoxyacetic acid in velvet mesquite seedlings. Bot. Gaz. 113: 368–372. 1952.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
4. Crafts, A. S. A theory of herbicidal action. Science 108: 85–86. 1948.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
5. Crafts, A. S. Herbicides, their absorption and translocation. Agr. and Food Chem. 1: 51–55. 1953.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
6. Eames, A. J. Destruction of phloem in young bean plants after treatment with 2,4–D. Am. Jour. Bot. 37: 840–847. 1950.Google Scholar
7. Emrick, W. E., and Leonard, O. A. Delayed kill of interior live oak by fall treatment with 2,4–D and 2,4,5–T. Jour. Range Mgt. 7: 75–76. 1954.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
8. Ennis, W. B. Influence of different carriers upon the inhibitory properties of growth-regulatory sprays. Weeds 1: 43–47. 1951.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
9. Fisher, C. E., Fults, Jess L., and Hopp, Henry. Factors affecting action of oils and water-soluble chemicals in mesquite eradication. Ecol. Mono. 16: 109–126. 1946.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
10. Fisher, C. E., Phillips, Wm. M., Meadors, C. H. Jr., Darrow, R. A., and McCully, W. G. Mesquite control, cooperative ranch tests, 1950–51. Tex. Agr. Expt. Sta. Prog. Report 1465. 10 pp. 1952.Google Scholar
11. Gertsch, Milton E. The influence of various carriers upon the inhibitory effectiveness of 2,4,–D sprays. Weeds 2: 33–42. 1953.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
12. Glendening, George E. Some quantitative data on the increase of mesquite and cactus on a desert glassland range in southern Arizona. Ecol. 33: 319–328. 1952.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
13. Hitchcock, A. E., and Zimmerman, P. W. Activation of 2,4–D by various adjuvants. Contrib. Boyce Thompson Inst. 15: 173–193. 1948.Google Scholar
14. Humphrey, R. R. Fire as a means of controlling velvet mesquite, burroweed, and cholla on southern Arizona ranges. Jour. Range Mgt. 2: 175–182. 1949.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
15. Mitchell, J. W., and Linder, P. J. Absorption and translocation of radioactive 2,4–DI by bean plants as affected by cosolvents and surface agents. Science 112: 54–55. 1950.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
16. Parker, Kenneth W., and Martin, S. Clark. The mesquite problem on southern Arizona ranges. U. S. Dept. Agr. Circ. 908. 1952.Google Scholar
17. Paulsen, Harold A. Jr. Mortality of velvet mesquite seedlings. Jour. Range Mgt. 3: 281–286. 1950.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
18. Reynolds, Hudson G. Some interrelations of the Merriam kangaroo rat to velvet mesquite. Jour. Range Mgt. 7: 176–180. 1954.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
19. Reynolds, Hudson G., and Glendening, G. E. Merriam kangaroo rat a factor in mesquite propagation on southern Arizona range lands. Jour. Range Mgt. 2: 193–197. 1949.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
20. Rice, E. L. Absorption and translocation of ammonium 2,4–dichlorophenoxyacetate by bean plants. Bot. Gaz. 109: 301–314. 1948.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
21. Roach, Mack E. Controlling mesquite with diesel oil pays. Ariz. Stockman 19 (8): 16–17. 1953.Google Scholar
22. Weintraub, Robert L., and Brown, James W. Translocation of exogenous growth-regulators in the bean seedling. Plant Physiol. 25: 140–149. 1950.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
23. Went, F. W., and Carter, Marcella. Growth response of tomato plants to applied sucrose. Am. Jour. Bot. 35: 95–106. 1948.CrossRefGoogle Scholar