Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rcrh6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-29T04:44:31.238Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Some Effects of Isopropyl N-(3-Chlorophenyl) Carbamate and an Alkanolamine Salt of Dinitro Ortho Secondary Butyl Phenol on Germinating Cotton Seeds

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

C. R. Swanson
Affiliation:
Division of Weed Investigations, Bureau of Plant Industry, Soils and Agricultural Engineering, U. S. Department of Agriculture, Beltsville, Maryland
W. C. Shaw
Affiliation:
Division of Weed Investigations, Bureau of Plant Industry, Soils and Agricultural Engineering, U. S. Department of Agriculture, Beltsville, Maryland
J. H. Hughes
Affiliation:
Division of Weed Investigations, Bureau of Plant Industry, Soils and Agricultural Engineering, U. S. Department of Agriculture, Beltsville, Maryland
Get access

Extract

Many field studies have indicated the relative tolerance of cotton and other crops to certain chemicals used as pre-emergence weed killers. The possibility does exist, however, that the herbicide may cause injury to the crop when applied prior to emergence of the seedlings. The extent of injury will depend upon a number of factors such as rate of application, depth of seeding, penetration of the chemical into the soil, absorption of the chemical by the young plant and inherent tolerance of the species to a given herbicide. Implicit in each field test is the possibility that, under different conditions of rainfall, temperature and soil type, injury to the seedling crop cannot be ruled out. Some factors can be controlled to provide maximum safety to the germinating crop seeds, but others, such as weather conditions, are largely uncontrollable.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © 1953 Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

1. Beevers, H. Malonic acid as an inhibitor of maize root respiration. Plant Physiol. 27: 725735. 1952.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
2. Beevers, H. 2,4-dinitrophenol and plant respiration. Am. Jour. Bot. 40: 9196. 1953.Google Scholar
3. Blackman, G. E., Templeman, W. G., and Halliday, D. J. Herbicides and selective phytotoxicity. Ann. Review of Plant Physiol. 2: 199230. 1951.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
4. Bonner, J. Limiting factors and growth inhibitors in the growth of the Avena coleoptile. Amer. Jour. Bot. 36: 323331. 1949.Google Scholar
5. Bonner, J. Relations of respiration and growth in the Avena coleoptile. Amer. Jour. Bot. 36: 429436. 1949.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
6. Ennis, W. B. Jr. Histological and cytological responses of certain plants to some aryl carbamic esters. Am. Jour. Bot. 36: 823. 1949.Google Scholar
7. Freed, V. H. Some factors influencing the herbicidal efficacy of isopropyl N-phenyl carbamate. Weeds 1: 4860. 1951.Google Scholar
8. Freed, V. H. Herbicide mechanism. Mode of action other than aryl oxyalkyl acid. J. of Agric. & Food Chem. 1: 4751. 1953.Google Scholar
9. Ivens, G. W., and Blackman, G. E. Inhibition of growth of apical meristems by ethyl phenylcarbamate. Nature 166: 954–55. 1950.Google Scholar
10. James, W. O., and Garton, N. The use of sodium diethyldithiocarbamate as a respiratory inhibitor. J. of Experimental Botany 3 (9): 310318. 1952.Google Scholar
11. Kelly, Sally, and Avery, G. S. Jr. The effect of 2,4-dichlorophenoxyacetic acid and other physiologically active substances on respiration. Am. Jour. Bot. 36: 421426. 1949.Google Scholar
12. Klinker, J. E. A modification of the Warburg respirometer to measure the respiration rate of tomato leaf discs. Plant Physiol. 25: 354355. 1950.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
13. Shaw, W. C., and Swanson, C. R. The relation of structural configuration to the herbicidal properties and phytotoxicity of several carbamates and other chemicals. Weeds 2: 4365. 1953.Google Scholar