Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-dsjbd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-29T03:43:01.037Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Silica in Medusahead

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

Charles F. Swenson ,
Duane Le Tourneau  and
Lambert C. Erickson
Charles F. Swenson
Affiliation:
Agronomy Department, University of Idaho, presently Soil Scientist, Soil Conservation Service, Grangeville, Idaho
Duane Le Tourneau
Affiliation:
Agricultural Experiment Station, University of Idaho, Moscow, Idaho
Lambert C. Erickson
Affiliation:
Agricultural Experiment Station, University of Idaho, Moscow, Idaho
Get access

Abstract

Collections of plants of medusahead, Elymus caput-medusae L., were made from natural infestations in Nez Perce County and Washington County in northern and southern Idaho, respectively. The ash and silica content (dry weight basis) decreased as the plant matured. The total ash of the entire plant contained from 72–89 per cent silica. Similar percentages of silica in ash were obtained in the culms, heads, and seeds of the plant. X-ray diffraction patterns and polarizing microscope examinations showed the mineral form of silica to be opal. Heavy deposition of silica was found in the barbs of awns, in the epidermis of the leaves, culms, glumes and seeds, and in strands beneath the epidermis.

Type
Research Article
Information
Weeds , Volume 12 , Issue 1 , January 1964 , pp. 16 - 18
Copyright
Copyright © 1964 Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

1. Bovey, R. W., Le Tourneau, D., and Erickson, L. C. 1961. The chemical composition of medusahead and downy brome-grass. Weeds 9:307–311.Google Scholar
2. Brown, B. A. 1940. The chemical composition of pasture species of the Northwest Region as influenced by fertilizers. Agron. J. 32:256–265.Google Scholar
3. Lanning, F. C. 1960. Nature and distribution of silica in strawberry plants. Am. Soc. Hort. Sci. 76:349–358.Google Scholar
4. Lanning, F. C. 1961. Silica and calcium in black raspberries. Am. Soc. Hort. Sci. 77:367–371.Google Scholar
5. Lanning, F. C., Ponnaiya, B. W. K., and Crumpton, C. F. 1958. The chemical nature of silica in plants. Plant Physiol. 33:339–343.Google Scholar
6. Lanning, F. C. and Linko, Y. 1961. Absorption and deposition of silica by four varieties of sorghum. J. Agr. Food Chem. 9:463–465.Google Scholar
7. Lovering, T. B. 1959. Significance of accumulator plants in rock weathering. Bull. Geol. Soc. Am. 70:781–800.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
8. Piper, C. S. 1947. Soil and plant analysis, p 263–265. Interscience Publishers, Inc., New York.Google Scholar
9. Tobiska, J. W., Douglass, E., Vail, C. E., and Morris, M. E. 1937. Nutritional characteristics of some mountain meadow hay plants in Colorado. Colorado Exp. Sta. Tech. Bull. 21. 23p.Google Scholar
10. Torell, P. J., Erickson, L. C., and Hass, R. H. 1961. The medusahead problem in Idaho. Weeds 9:124–131.Google Scholar
11. Whittenberger, R. T. 1945. Silicon absorption by rye and sunflower. Am. J. Bot. 32:539–549.CrossRefGoogle Scholar