Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t8hqh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T05:13:13.119Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Responses of Corn Hybrids to Yellow Foxtail Competition

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

David W. Staniforth*
Affiliation:
Department of Botany and Plant Pathology
Get access

Extract

Investigations of the competitive effects of Setaria lutescens (Weigel) F. T. Hubb. (yellow foxtail) on corn have dealt primarily with the factors of crop and weed populations, nitrogen fertilizer applications, duration of the period of competition and the amount and distribution of seasonal rainfall. Differences in the competitive efficiencies of various crops and weeds have been demonstrated under various production conditions, but relatively less is known regarding competitive efficiencies among varieties of given crop species. Working under the dryland conditions of Western Canada, Pavlychenko and Harrington compared the competitive efficiencies of several small grains. They ranked barley as the most efficient competitor of weeds, followed by spring rye, wheat and oats in that order. The importance of fertilizer applications in increasing the competitive efficiency of crops has been investigated widely. Previous studies with corn and soybeans have demonstrated some aspects of the role of soil moisture in determining the nature and extent of weed competition in these crops.

Type
Research Article
Information
Weeds , Volume 9 , Issue 1 , January 1961 , pp. 132 - 136
Copyright
Copyright © 1961 Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

1. Blackman, G. E., and Templeman, W. G. The nature of competition between cereal crops and annual weeds. Jour. Agr. Sci. 28:247271. 1938.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2. Godel, G. L. Relation between rate of seeding and yield of cereal crops in competition with weeds. Sci Agr. 16:165168. 1935.Google Scholar
3. Nieto, J., and Staniforth, D. W. Corn-foxtail competition under various production conditions. Agron. Jour. (In press). 1960.Google Scholar
4. Pavlychenko, T. K., and Harrington, J. B. Competitive efficiency of weeds and cereal crops. Can. Jour. Res. 10:7794. 1934.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
5. Staniforth, D. W. Effects of annual grass weeds on the yield of corn. Agron. Jour. 49:551555. 1957.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
6. Staniforth, D. W. Soybean-foxtail competition under varying soil moisture conditions. Agron. Jour. 50:1315. 1958.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
7. Staniforth, D. W., and Weber, C. R. Effects of annual weeds on the growth and yield of soybeans. Agron. Jour. 48:467471. 1956.CrossRefGoogle Scholar