Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t7czq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-28T21:11:06.869Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Movement of Herbicides in Soil with Simulated Furrow Irrigation

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

Floyd M. Ashton
Floyd M. Ashton*
Affiliation:
Agricultural Botany, University of California, Davis
Get access

Extract

The use of herbicides in row crops in areas where furrow irrigation is used presents unique conditions for the use of soil applied herbicides. Pre-emergence herbicides have not been as uniformly successful under arid irrigated conditions as they have been in areas of frequent rainfall. Soil incorporation of many herbicides in the top few inches of soil has resulted in improved performance under furrow irrigation.

Type
Research Article
Information
Weeds , Volume 9 , Issue 4 , October 1961 , pp. 612 - 619
Copyright
Copyright © 1961 Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

1. Ashton, Floyd M. Soil factors affecting the effectiveness of pre-emergence herbicides. Proc. California Weed Control Conf. pp. 109–11. 1960.Google Scholar
2. Ashton, Floyd M. The major problem in vegetable crop production—weed control. Proc. California Weed Control Conf. pp. 72–74. 1960.Google Scholar
3. Bartley, Clayton E. Triazine compounds. Farm Chemicals 112 No. 5, 1959.Google Scholar
4. Bernstein, Leon, and Fireman, Milton. Laboratory studies on salt distribution in furrow-irrigated soils with special reference to pre-emergence period. Soil Sci. 83:249–263. 1956.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
5. Bucha, H. C., and Todd, C. W. 3–(p-chlorophenyl)–1,1–dimethylurea—a new herbicide. Science 114:493–494. 1951.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
6. Coggins, C. W. Jr., and Crafts, A. S. Substituted urea herbicides: their electrophoretic behavior and the influence of clay colloids in nutrient solution on their phytotoxicity. Weeds 7:349–358. 1959.Google Scholar
7. Crafts, A. S. Toxicity of sodium arsenite and sodium chlorate in four California soils. Hilgardia 9:459–498. 1935.Google Scholar
8. Dallyn, Stewart. The effect of the organic matter level on several herbicides. Proc. NEWCC. 8:13–20. 1954.Google Scholar
9. Foy, Chester L. Logarithmic screening evaluation of endothal and certain thiolcarbamate herbicides applied to sugar beets. Research Progress Rept. WWCC pp. 51–52. 1960.Google Scholar
10. Foy, Chester L. The comparative effectiveness of several soil-incorporated herbicides for weed control in sugar beets. Research Progress Rept. WWCC pp. 53–54. 1960.Google Scholar
11. Hill, G. D., McGahen, J. W., Baker, H. M., Finnerty, D. W., and Bingeman, C. W. The fate of substituted urea herbicides in agricultural soils. Agron. J. 47:93–104. 1955.Google Scholar
12. Linder, P. J. Movement and persistence of herbicides following their application to the soil surface. Proc. NEWCC 6:7–11. 1952.Google Scholar
13. Sherburne, H. R., and Freed, V. H. Adsorption of 3-(p-chlorophenyl)-1,1-dimethylurea as a function of soil constituents. J. Agr. Food Chem. 2:937–939. 1954.Google Scholar