Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rdxmf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T05:43:31.681Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Movement and Persistence of Methanearsonates in Soil

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

Ray Dickens  and
A. E. Hiltbold
Ray Dickens
Affiliation:
Department of Agronomy and Soils, Auburn University
A. E. Hiltbold
Affiliation:
Department of Agronomy and Soils, Auburn University Agricultural Experiment Station, Auburn, Alabama
Get access

Abstract

Experiments were conducted to determine adsorption of methanearsonate by soils, soil separates, and reference clay minerals from solutions of disodium methanearsonate (DSMA), effects of soil type and pH on the leaching of surface-applied DSMA, and effects of soil type and added organic matter on the oxidation of the methyl carbon of methanearsonate.

Adsorption of methanearsonate by kaolinite and vermiculite increased with increasing concentration of DSMA in the equilibrium solution. Kaolinite and limonite adsorbed much more methanearsonate than vermiculite and montmorillonite. The clay fraction of Augusta silt loam adsorbed more methanearsonate than did the sand and silt fractions. Adsorption by whole soils was related generally to their clay contents.

Leaching with 20 successive 1-in increments of water removed 52% of surface-applied methanearsonate from Norfolk loamy sand. Rates of movement of DSMA in Norfolk loamy sand did not differ at three pH levels. About one-half of the applied methanearsonate remained in the surface inch of Decatur clay loam and none was leached below 6 in.

Oxidation of the methyl carbon of methanearsonate was associated with oxidation of soil organic matter in each soil. In three of the soils, there was no evidence of microbiological adaptation to methanearsonate. In Norfolk loamy sand, however, increasing decomposition of methanearsonate relative to soil organic matter occurred with time of incubation. Decomposition of added plant material in this soil enhanced the oxidation of methanearsonate.

Type
Research Article
Information
Weeds , Volume 15 , Issue 4 , October 1967 , pp. 299 - 304
Copyright
Copyright © 1967 Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

1. Bishop, R. F. and Chesholm, D. 1962. Arsenic accumulation in Annapolis Valley orchard soils. Canadian Soil Sci. 42:77–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2. Cooper, H. P., Paden, W. R., Hall, E. E., Albert, W. B., Rogers, W. D., and Riley, J. A. 1932. Soils differ markedly in their response to additions of calcium arsenate. South Carolina Agr. Exp. Sta. Ann. Rpt. 45:23.Google Scholar
3. Crafts, A. S. and Rosenfel, R. S. 1939. Toxicity studies with arsenic in 80 California soils. Hilgardia 12:177–199.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
4. Dorman, E. and Coleman, R. 1939. The effect of calcium arsenate upon yield of cotton on different soil types. Amer. Soc. Agron. 31:966–971.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
5. Dorman, E., Tucker, F. H., and Coleman, R. 1939. The effect of calcium arsenate upon the productivity of several important soils of the cotton belt. Amer. Soc. Agron. 31:1020–1028.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
6. Ehman, P. J. 1965. Effect of arsenical build-up in the soil on subsequent growth and residue content of crops. Proc. SWC 18:685–687.Google Scholar
7. Frans, R. E. and Aldrich, R. J. 1953. Herbicidal comparison between sodium arsenite and several experimental arsenic compounds. Proc. NEWCC 7:17–22.Google Scholar
8. Greaves, J. E. 1934. The arsenic content of soils. Soil Sci. 38:355–362.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
9. Hurd-Karrer, A. M. 1939. Antagonism of certain elements essential to plants toward chemically related toxic elements. Plant Physiol. 14:9–29.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
10. McCormick, L. L. and Hiltbold, A. E. 1966. Microbiological decomposition of atrazine and diuron in soil. Weeds 14:77–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
11. McGeorge, W. T. 1915. Fate and effect of arsenic applied as a spray for weeds. Agr. Res. 5:459–463.Google Scholar
12. Rubins, E. J. and Dean, W. A. 1947. Anion exchange in soils. II. Methods of study. Soil Sci. 63:389–397.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
13. Singh, R. K. N. and Campbell, R. W. 1965. Herbicides on bluegrass. Weeds 13:170–171.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
14. Williams, K. T. and Whetstone, R. R. 1940. Arsenic distribution in soils and its presence in certain plants. U. S. Dep. Agr. Tech. Bull. 732, Washington, D.C. 20 p.Google Scholar