Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-r5fsc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-29T01:38:28.918Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Mode of Action of Simazine in Barley

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

W. Sherrill Allen  and
Rupert D. Palmer
Rupert D. Palmer
Affiliation:
Plant Pathology and Weed Control, Mississippi Agricultural Experiment Station, Mississippi State University, State College, Mississippi
Get access

Abstract

The toxic effects of 2-chloro-4,6-bis(ethylamino)-s-triazine (simazine) to barley were avoided by feeding plants treated with 1.5 lb/A of simazine, sucrose, glucose, aspartate, and maltose. Shoots from plants fed glucose and maltose contained more soluble carbohydrate than the check. Plants fed glutamine and asparagine were higher in total nitrogen content than the check. Plants fed sucrose and maltose increased their nitrogen content over the check, but plants fed glucose did not. The harmful effects of simazine occurred primarily in barley shoots exposed to light. Plants grown in the dark showed a very small decrease in weight of shoots and soluble carbohydrate content as the level of simazine increased, while the weight of the shoots and soluble carbohydrate content of treated plants grown in the light decreased sharply. Simazine had little effect on root growth of plants grown in the light or dark. The data on root respiration showed that barley roots metabolized the added substances differently and that simazine differentially influenced their metabolism by the roots.

Type
Research Article
Information
Weeds , Volume 11 , Issue 1 , January 1963 , pp. 27 - 31
Copyright
Copyright © 1963 Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

1. Gast, A. 1958. “Über Pflanzenuaschstumsregulatorem” Beitrage zur kenntnis der phytotoxischen wirkung von triazinen. Experientia 14:134–136.Google Scholar
2. Moreland, D. E., Gentner, W. A., Hilton, J. L., and Hill, K. L. 1959. Studies on the mechanism of herbicidal action of 2-chloro-4,6-bis(ethylamino)-s-triazine. Plant Physiol. 34:432–435.Google Scholar
3. Palmer, R. D., and Porter, W. K. Jr. 1959. The metabolism of nut grass (Cyperus rotundus L.). II. The respiratory quotient and its relation to storage materials and some terminal enzymes. Weeds 7:490–503.Google Scholar
4. Roth, W. 1958. Substances regulatrires de la croissance vegetale. Experientia 14:137–141.Google Scholar
5. Umbreit, W. W., Burris, R. H., and Stauffer, J. F. 1957. Manometric techniques. Burgess Publ. Co., Minneapolis, Minnesota. 3rd ed. Google Scholar
6. Zweig, G., and Ashton, F. M. 1962. The effect of 2-chloro-4-ethylamino-6-isopropylamino-s-triazine (atrazine) on distribution of C14 compounds following C14O2 fixation in excised kidney bean leaves. J. Exp. Botany 13:5–11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar