Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-gb8f7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T05:26:45.919Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Influence of Weed Competition on Sugar Beets

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

Robert L. Zimdahl
Affiliation:
Department of Agronomy, Cornell University, Ithaca, New York
Stanford N. Fertig
Affiliation:
Department of Agronomy, Cornell University, Ithaca, New York
Get access

Abstract

The effects of four densities of annual broadleaf weeds and annual grass weeds and an equal combination of the two on the yields of sugar beet (Beta vulgaris L.) roots and tops, percent sucrose and total solids, average diameter of beet roots, and total plot yields were studied during 1964 and 1965. Broadleaf weeds were more competitive than annual grass weeds and the effects of an equal combination were intermediate. Without cultivation, all weed densities reduced the yield of beet roots below the weed-free plots. Twenty broadleaf weeds/sq ft were required to reduce yields when plots were cultivated and weeds were limited to a 10-in band over the beet row. The effects on the yield of beet tops, average root diameter, and total plot yield were similar to the effects on beet root yield. The components of total plot yield are examined. No weed density had a real effect on beet stand, percent total solids, or percent sucrose of the beet roots.

Type
Research Article
Information
Weeds , Volume 15 , Issue 4 , October 1967 , pp. 336 - 339
Copyright
Copyright © 1967 Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

1. Brimhall, P. B., Chamberlain, E. W., and Alley, H. P. 1965. Competitive effects of annual weeds growing with sugar beets. Weeds 13:3335.Google Scholar
2. Burtch, L. M. and Carlson, C. M. 1959. Yield comparisons from chemically and hand weeded sugar beets under several water grass conditions in California. J. Am. Soc. Sugar Beet Tech. 10:467477.Google Scholar
3. Dawson, J. H. 1965. Competition between irrigated sugar beets and annual weeds. Weeds 13:245249.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
4. Donald, C. M. 1963. Competition among crop and pasture plants. Adv. Agron. 15:1114.CrossRefGoogle Scholar