Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-dlnhk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-28T22:46:22.251Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Influence of Surfactants on the Activity of Diuron, Linuron, and Bromacil as Foliar Sprays on Weeds

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

G. D. Hill Jr.
Affiliation:
Contribution from Industrial and Biochemicals Department, Experimental Station, E. I. du Pont de Nemours & Company, Inc., Wilmington, Delaware
I. J. Belasco
Affiliation:
Contribution from Industrial and Biochemicals Department, Experimental Station, E. I. du Pont de Nemours & Company, Inc., Wilmington, Delaware
H. L. Ploeg
Affiliation:
Contribution from Industrial and Biochemicals Department, Experimental Station, E. I. du Pont de Nemours & Company, Inc., Wilmington, Delaware
Get access

Abstract

In greenhouse tests, temperature, humidity, drought stress, and concentration of surfactant influenced the foliar activity of spray mixtures containing a dodecyl ether of polyethylene glycol (Surfactant WK) and 3-(3,4-dichlorophenyl)-1,1-dimethyl urea (diuron) or 3-(3,4-dichlorophenyl)-1-methoxy-1-methyl urea (linuron). In comparisons with other commonly used surfactants, Surfactant WK gave a superior performance when used in conjunction with diuron, linuron, and 5-bromo-3-sec-butyl-6-methyl uracil (bromacil). Increased water solubility of these herbicides in the presence of surfactant is only one factor among many involved in the enhanced activity of such combinations. Surfactant WK facilitated the deposition of high concentrations of linuron on leaf surfaces of Johnsongrass. Once a gradient was established, subsequent rapid movement of the herbicide into the leaf was noted.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © 1965 Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

1. Bryan, A. M., Staniforth, D. W. and Loomis, W. H. 1950. Absorption of 2,4-D by leaves. Proc. NCWCC 7:9295.Google Scholar
2. Clor, M. A., Crafts, A. S. and Yamaguchi, S. 1962. Effects of high humidity on translocation of foliar-applied labeled compounds in plants. Plant Physiol. 37:609617.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
3. Clor, M. A., Crafts, A. S. and Yamaguchi, S. 1963. Effects of high humidity on translocation of foliar-applied labeled compounds in plants. II. Translocation from starved leaves. Plant Physiol. 38:501507.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
4. Dybing, C. D. and Currier, H. B. 1961. Foliar penetration by chemicals. Plant Physiol. 36:169174.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
5. Jansen, L. L., Gentner, W. A. and Shaw, W. C. 1961. Effect of surfactants on the herbicidal activity of several herbicides in aqueous spray systems. Weeds 9:381405.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
6. McWhorter, C. G. and Sheets, T. J. 1961. The effectiveness of five phenyl ureas as foliar sprays and the influence of surfactants on their activity. Proc. SWC 14:5459.Google Scholar
7. McWhorter, C. G. 1963. Effects of surfactants on the herbicidal activity of foliar sprays of diuron. Weeds 11:265269.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
8. Pease, H. L. 1962. Separation and colorimetric determination of monuron and diuron residues. Agr. and Food Chem. 10:279381.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
9. Temple, R. E. and Hilton, H. W. 1963. The effect of surfactants on the water solubility of herbicides and the foliar phytotoxicity of surfactants. Weeds 11:297300.CrossRefGoogle Scholar