Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-g8jcs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-29T00:45:19.995Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Influence of Environment on the Response of Plants to Herbicides

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

T. J. Muzik  and
W. G. Mauldin
T. J. Muzik
Affiliation:
Washington Agricultural Experiment Station, Pullman, Washington
W. G. Mauldin
Affiliation:
Washington Agricultural Experiment Station, Pullman, Washington
Get access

Abstract

Absorption and translocation in both leaves and roots is less under low temperatures. Seasonal response of wheat to 2,4-D is conditioned by the stage of growth as well as environment. The response of wheat and downy bromegrass to triazine herbicides is seasonal, whereas the response to carbamate herbicides appears to be influenced by local environmental conditions at time of spraying. Physiological condition of fiddleneck is more important than age, i.e., plants in the rosette stage were always far more sensitive than bolting plants of the same age. Sensitivity to 2,4-D was greater at 26 C than at 10 C or 5 C at all stages of growth. Applications of certain metabolites, especially thiamin, increased the sensitivity of fiddleneck to 2,4-D at low temperatures.

Type
Research Article
Information
Weeds , Volume 12 , Issue 2 , April 1964 , pp. 142 - 145
Copyright
Copyright © 1964 Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

1. Audus, L. J. 1959. Plant growth substances, p. 293–295. Leonard Hill (Books) Ltd., London.Google Scholar
2. Bonner, J. and Bonner, H. 1948. The B vitamins as plant hormones. Vitamins and Hormones 6:225–270.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
3. Canode, C. L., Robocker, W. C., and Muzik, T. J. 1962. Grass seed production as influenced by chemical control of downy brome. Weeds 10:216–219.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
4. Currier, H. B. and Dybing, C. D. 1959. Foliar penetration of herbicides—review and present status. Weeds 7:195–213.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
5. Johanson, W. G. and Muzik, T. J. 1961. Some effects of 2,4-D on wheat yield and root growth. Botan. Gaz. 122:188–194.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
6. Kelly, S. 1949. The effect of temperature on the susceptibility of plants to 2,4-D. Plant Physiol. 24:534–536.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
7. Ketellapper, H. J. 1963. Temperature-induced chemical defects in higher plants. Plant Physiol. 38:175–179.Google Scholar
8. Leopold, A. C. 1960. Auxins and plant growth, p. 91–93. Univ. California Press.Google Scholar
9. Petinov, N. S. and Molotkovsky, Y. G. 1957. Protective reactions in heat-resistant plants induced by high temperatures. Fiziologiyo Rasteny (Plant Physiology) 4:221–225.Google Scholar