Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-l7hp2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-29T00:44:54.847Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The Importance of Shoot Entry in the Action of Herbicides Applied to the Soil

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

C. Parker*
Affiliation:
Department of Horticulture, Purdue University
Get access

Abstract

A technique was developed for the bioassay in 48 to 84 hours of herbicides in soil or of herbicidal solutions applied to sand. Sorghum seedlings are grown against the lids of petri dishes which are filled with a moistened sand or soil medium. A modification of this technique allows the assessment of the relative importance of uptake by the root and the shoot of a range of herbicides incorporated in sand or soil.

Ethyl N,N-dipropylthiolcarbamate (EPTC), 2,3-dichloroallyl N,N-diisopropylthiolcarbamate (diallate), 2-chloroallyl-N,N-diethyldithiocarbamate (CDEC), and possibly 2-chloro-N,N-diallylacetamide (CDAA) are dependent on uptake via the shoot prior to emergence for their characteristic toxic effects. Isopropyl N-(3-chlorophenyl) carbamate (CIPC), 2,6-dichlorobenzonitrile (dichlobenil), and 2,6-dinitro-N,N-dipropyl-4-trifluoromethylaniline (trifluralin) can exert their action through direct uptake by the shoot, but root uptake appears to be much more effective. A number of other compounds appear to be ineffective when uptake is via the shoot from moistened sand.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © 1966 Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

1. Appleby, A. P., Furtick, W. R., and Fang, S. C. 1965. Soil placement studies with EPTC and other carbamate herbicides on Avena sativa . Weed Res. 5:115122.Google Scholar
2. Baker, J. B. 1960. An explanation for the selective control of barnyardgrass in rice with CIPC. Weeds 8:3947.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
3. Blackman, G. E. 1961. A new physiological approach to the selective action of 2,4-dichlorophenoxyacetic acid, p. 233247. In Plant growth regulation, Iowa State University Press, Ames, Iowa.Google Scholar
4. Dawson, J. H. 1963. Development of barnyardgrass seedlings and their response to EPTC. Weeds 11:6067.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
5. Friesen, H. A., Banting, J. D., and Walker, D. R. 1962. The effect of placement and concentration of 2,3-DCDT on the selective control of wild oats in wheat. Canad. J. Plant Sci. 42:91104.Google Scholar
6. Funderburk, H. H. Jr. and Lawrence, J. M. 1963. Absorption and translocation of radioactive herbicides in submersed and emersed aquatic weeds. Weed Res. 3:304311.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
7. Hannah, L. H., Hamm, P. C., and Selleck, G. W. 1961. The performance of 2,3-dichloroallyl-diisopropylthiolcarbamate in the wild oat areas of North America. Proc. Brit. Weed Control Conf. 5:481485.Google Scholar
8. Hartley, G. S. 1960. Physico-chemical aspects of the availability of herbicides in soils, p. 6378. In Herbicides and the soil. Brit. Weed Control Council Symposium. Woodford, E. K. and Sager, G. R. (Ed.). Blackwell Sci. Pub., Oxford.Google Scholar
9. Holly, K. 1962. Herbicides acting through the soil—a review. Proc. Brit. Weed Control Conf. 6:467477.Google Scholar
10. Lindquist, D. A., Hacskaylo, J., and Davich, J. B. 1961. Absorption and translocation of phorate and phosphorus by cotton seedlings. Bot. Gaz. 123(2): 137140.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
11. Ogle, R. E. and Warren, G. F. 1954. Fate and activity of herbicides in soils. Weeds 3:257273.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
12. Parker, C. 1963. Factors affecting selectivity of 2,3-dichloroallyl N,N-diisopropylthiolcarbamate (diallate) against Avena spp. in wheat and barley. Weed Res. 3:259276.Google Scholar
13. Parker, C. 1964. Methods for the rapid bioassay of herbicides. Proc. Brit. Weed Control Conf. 7:899902.Google Scholar
14. Sheets, T. J. and Danielson, L. L. 1960. Herbicides in soils. p. 170181. In The nature and fate of chemicals applied to soils, plants, and animals. USDA, ARS Publ. 20-9.Google Scholar