Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t7czq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-29T01:57:06.524Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Growth and Development of Yellow Foxtail and Giant Foxtail

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

P. W. Santelmann ,
J. A. Meade  and
R. A. Peters
P. W. Santelmann
Affiliation:
Oklahoma State University, formerly of the University of Maryland
J. A. Meade
Affiliation:
University of Maryland
R. A. Peters
Affiliation:
Storrs, (Connecticut) Agricultural Station
Get access

Abstract

Development was followed in Connecticut and Maryland. Germination of yellow foxtail (Setaria lutescens (Weigel) F. T. Hubb. occurred over a long time period. Tillering of the developing plants was affected by spacing between plants and location. The average number of tillers in Maryland was 75 for plants spaced 12 in. apart and 26 for plants spaced 2 in. apart. In the greenhouse under short day conditions seed heads were readily produced. Under continuous light no seed heads formed. Giant foxtail (S. Faberii Herrm.) followed a similar growth pattern but the plants were larger and formed fewer tillers. Growth of both species was severely affected by shading. Both species rooted from cuttings.

Type
Research Article
Information
Weeds , Volume 11 , Issue 2 , April 1963 , pp. 139 - 142
Copyright
Copyright © 1963 Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

1. Allard, H. A. 1941. Some plants found in northern Virginia and West Virginia. Virginia J. Sci. 2:116–119.Google Scholar
2. Blackman, G. E., and Templeman, W. G. 1938. The nature of competition between cereal crops and annual weeds. J. Agri. Sci. 28:247–271.Google Scholar
3. Evers, R. A. 1949. Setaria faberii in Illinois. Rhodora 51:391–392.Google Scholar
4. Fernald, M. L. 1944. Setaria faberii in Eastern America. Rhodora 46:57–58.Google Scholar
5. Friesen, G. 1957. Crop loss studies in Manitoba. Proc. 10th Meet. W. Sect. Canada Natl. Weed Comm.: 78–80.Google Scholar
6. Kerkin, A. J. and Peters, R. A. 1957. Herbicidal effectiveness of 2,4-DB, MCPB, neburon and other materials as measured by weed control and yields of seedling alfalfa and birdsfoot trefoil. Proc. NEWCC 11:128–138.Google Scholar
7. King, L. J. 1952. Germination and chemical control of the giant foxtail grass. Contrib. Boyce Thompson Inst. 16 (11):469–489.Google Scholar
8. Peters, R. A. and Yokum, H. C. 1961. Progress report on a study of the germination and growth of yellow foxtail [Setaria glauca (L.) Beauv.]. Proc. NEWCC 15:350–355.Google Scholar
9. Pohl, R. W. 1951. The genus Setaria in Iowa. Iowa State Col. J. of Sci.: 501–508.Google Scholar
10. Santelmann, P. W., and Meade, J. A. 1961. Variation in morphological characteristics and dalapon susceptibility within the species Setaria lutescens and S. faberii . Weeds 9:406–410.Google Scholar
11. Sexsmith, J. J. 1956. Green foxtail and other weedy grasses. Res. Rpt. W. Sect. Can. Natl. Weed Comm.: 52–54.Google Scholar
12. Slife, F. W. and Scott, W. O. 1951. Giant foxtail—new corn belt weed menace. What's New in Crops and Soils 3(7):22–23.Google Scholar
13. Staniforth, D. W. 1956. Plant competition studies with soybean and Setaria spp. Proc. NEWCC 13:9.Google Scholar
14. Staniforth, D. W. 1957. Effects of annual grass weeds on the yield of corn. Agron. J. 49:551–555.Google Scholar
15. Staniforth, D. W. 1958. Soybean-foxtail competition under varying soil moisture conditions. Agron. J. 50:13–15.Google Scholar
16. Staniforth, D. W. 1961. Responses of corn hybrids to yellow foxtail competition. Weeds 9:132–136.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
17. Staniforth, D. W., and Weber, C. R. 1956. Effects of annual weeds on the growth and yield of soybeans. Agron. J. 48:467–471.Google Scholar
18. Wood, C. E. Jr. 1956. Setaria faberii in North Carolina. Rhodora 48:391–392.Google Scholar