Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-tf8b9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-29T01:32:18.106Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Evaluation of Herbicides Applied to Soil for Control of Aquatic Weeds in Irrigation Canals

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

P. A. Frank ,
R. H. Hodgson  and
R. D. Comes
P. A. Frank
Affiliation:
Crops Research Division, Agricultural Research Service, U.S. Department of Agriculture
R. H. Hodgson
Affiliation:
Crops Research Division, Agricultural Research Service, U.S. Department of Agriculture
R. D. Comes
Affiliation:
Crops Research Division, Agricultural Research Service, U.S. Department of Agriculture
Get access

Abstract

Ninety-one herbicides and experimental compounds were evaluated for herbicidal activity on submersed aquatic weeds, Potamogeton pectinatus L. and P. nodosus Poir. Twenty-one of the compounds tested showed some phytotoxicity at 20 lb/A. The other compounds were completely inactive. 2,3,6-Trichlorophenylacetic acid (fenac) and 2,6-dichlorobenzonitrile (dichlobenil), showed outstanding activity with good persistence in water-saturated soil. Fenac and 2-(2,4,5-trichlorophenoxy)propionic acid (silvex), were tested in field trials in an irrigation canal in eastern Wyoming. The sodium salt and amide of fenac did not give adequate weed control at 5 lb/A. Spring applications of herbicides did not perform as well as fall ones. Mechanical incorporation of herbicides improved some results, but was of doubtful value.

Type
Research Article
Information
Weeds , Volume 11 , Issue 2 , April 1963 , pp. 124 - 128
Copyright
Copyright © 1963 Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

1. Grigsby, B. H. 1957. Further observations on the use of pelleted herbicides for the control of aquatic weeds. Proc. NCWCC 14:32.Google Scholar
2. Grigsby, B. H. and Hamilton, R. H. 1958. New techniques in the application of herbicides for the control of aquatic weeds. WSA Abstracts 56.Google Scholar
3. Stovell, F.R. 1961. A progress report on the development of aquatic weed control. Proc. British Weed Control Conf. 5:587–593.Google Scholar
4. Timmons, F. L., and Weldon, L. W. 1960. Effectiveneses of neburon and simazine for control of sago pondweed in an irrigation canal. Res. Progress Rept. WWCC 59–60.Google Scholar
5. Younger, R. R. 1959. Progress report on the use of Kuron, 2,4-D and 2,4,5-TP granules as aquatic herbicides. Proc. NEWCC 13:322–328.Google Scholar