Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-2plfb Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-28T22:54:46.888Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Effects of Soil Acidity on the Adsorption, Penetration, and Persistence of Simazine

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

D. C. Nearpass
Get access

Abstract

In 1:1 slurry, adsorption of 2-chloro-4,6-bis (ethylamino)-s-triazine (simazine) by acid soils from saturated solution varied from 13 to 90%. Percent of adsorption from more dilute solutions was approximately that from the saturated solution. The adsorption of simazine by 18 soils was not correlated significantly with soil pH, but was correlated significantly with percent clay and highly significantly with organic matter and titratable acidity. Simazine was considered to be adsorbed by soils by proton association. Using titratable acidity as a measure of H-soil, equilibrium constants were calculated which did not vary greatly as a result of changes in acidity up to pH 8.5, or as a result of concentration of simazine in the added solution. Leon, the most adsorptive of the tested soils, gave values for the equilibrium constant that were somewhat higher than for four other soils. Simazine penetrated more deeply into limed soil than into unlimed soil. Liming reduced the decomposition of simazine as did intermittent drying. Recovery decreased with time.

Type
Research Article
Information
Weeds , Volume 13 , Issue 4 , October 1965 , pp. 341 - 346
Copyright
Copyright © 1965 Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

1. Aelbers, E. and Homburg, K. 1959. De inactivering en penetratie van simazin in de grond. Meded. Land-Hogesch. Gent. 24:893–898.Google Scholar
2. Burnside, O. C., Fenster, C. R., and Wicks, G. A. 1963. Dissipation and leaching of monuron, simazine and atrazine in Nebraska soils. Weeds 11:209–213.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
3. Burschel, P. 1961. Untersuchungen über das Verhalten von Simazin im Boden. Weed Res. 1:131–141.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
4. De Vries, M. L. 1963. The effect of simazine on Monterey pine and corn as influenced by lime, bases, and aluminum sulfate. Weeds 11:220–222.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
5. Frissel, M. J. 1961. The adsorption of some organic compounds, especially herbicides, on clay minerals. Voor Landbouw Publikaties En Landbouwdocumentatie, Wageningen, Holland.Google Scholar
6. Grim, R. E., Allaway, W. H., and Cuthbert, F. L. 1947. Reaction of different clay minerals with some organic cations. J. Amer. Ceram. Soc. 30:137–142.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
7. Gysin, H., and Knüsli, E. 1960. Chemistry and herbicidal properties of triazine derivatives. In Metcalf, R. L. (ed.) Advances in Pest Control Research 3:289–358. Interscience Publishers, New York.Google Scholar
8. Harris, C. I., and Sheets, T. J. 1965. Influence of soil properties on adsorption and phytotoxicity of CIPC, diuron and simazine. Weeds 13:215–219.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
9. Harris, C. I., and Warren, G. F. 1964. Adsorption and desorption of herbicides by soil. Weeds 12:120–126.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
10. Hilton, H. W., and Yuen, Q. H. 1963. Adsorption of several preemergence herbicides by Hawaiian sugar cane soils. J. Agr. Food Chem. 11:230–234.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
11. Holly, K., and Roberts, H. A. 1963. Persistence of phytotoxic residues of triazine herbicides in soil. Weed Res. 3:1–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
12. McAuliffe, C., and Coleman, N. T. 1955. H-ion catalysis by acid clays and exchange resins. Soil Sci. Soc. Amer. Proc. 19:156–160.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
13. McLean, E. O., Hourigan, W. R., Shoemaker, H. E., and Bhumbla, D. R. 1964. Aluminum in soils. V. Form of aluminum as a cause of soil acidity and a complication of its measurement. Soil Sci. 97:119–126.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
14. Peech, M., Alexander, L. T., Dean, L. A. and Reed, J. F. 1947. Methods of soil analysis for soil-fertility investigations. U. S. Dept. Agr. Circ. 757.Google Scholar
15. Piper, C. S. 1944. Soil and plant analysis. Interscience Publishers, Inc. New York. 368 p.Google Scholar
16. Rice, F. E. and Osugi, M. 1918. The inversion of cane sugar by soils and allied substances and the nature of soil acidity. Soil Sci. 5:333–358.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
17. Shapiro, R. E. and Fried, M. 1959. Relative release and retentiveness of soil phosphates. Soil Sci. Soc. Amer. Proc. 23: 195–198.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
18. Sheets, T. J., Crafts, A. S. and Drever, H. R. 1962. Influence of soil properties on the phytotoxicity of the s-triazine herbicides. J. Agr. Food Chem. 10:458–462.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
19. Sheets, T. J. and Shaw, W. C. 1963. Herbicidal properties and persistence in soils of s-triazines. Weeds 11:15–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
20. Talbert, R. E. and Fletchall, O. H. 1964. Inactivation of simazine in the field. Weeds 12:33–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
21. Upchurch, R. P. and Mason, D. D. 1962. The influence of soil organic matter on the phytotoxicity of herbicides. Weeds 10:9–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar