Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-l7hp2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-29T00:43:04.092Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Effects of Four Herbicides on Microorganisms in Nine Oregon Soils

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

Purna Chandra ,
William R. Furtick  and
Walter B. Bollen
Get access

Extract

The potential extensive use of certain new herbicides has made it desirable to study their effects on soil microorganisms. If these compounds have any retarding or stimulating influences on the general soil microflora, this could be reflected in carbon dioxide evolution during soil respiration experiments. Microorganisms are important to soil fertility because they transform potential plant nutrients into active or available forms, and carbon dioxide is a significant index of their activity. The effects on carbon dioxide evolution of four new herbicides that have shown promising results in field trials at this station are presented in this report.

Type
Research Article
Information
Weeds , Volume 8 , Issue 4 , October 1960 , pp. 589 - 598
Copyright
Copyright © 1960 Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

1. Anonymous. Weed control recommendations for Oregon 1959–60. Oregon State College Ext. Cir. 643. 1959.Google Scholar
2. Association of Official Agricultural Chemists. Official and tentative methods of analysis. p. 30. Washington, D. C. 1955.Google Scholar
3. Bingham, S. W., and Church, R. P. Some interactions between nutrient level (N, P, K, Ca) and diuron in the growth of cotton and Italian rye grains. Weeds 7:167–177. 1959.Google Scholar
4. Bollen, W. B. Respiration studies on the decomposition of native organic matter. Iowa State Col. Jour. Sci. 15:353–374. 1941.Google Scholar
5. Cooper, S. C. The mixed indicator bromocresolgreen–methyl red for carbonates in water. Indust. Eng. Chem. (Anal. Ed.) 15:466–470. 1941.Google Scholar
6. Commonwealth Bureau of Soil Science. Bibliography on the fate and decomposition of organic weed killers in soil (1948–58). p. 18. 1958.Google Scholar
7. Dallyn, S. The effect of soil organic matter level on several herbicides. NEWCC 8:13–21. 1954.Google Scholar
8. Kilmer, V. J., and Alexander, L. T. Method of making mechanical analyses of soils. Soil Sci. 68:15–24. 1949.Google Scholar
9. Newman, A. S., and Downing, C. R. Herbicides and soil. Agr. and Food Chem. 6:352–353. 1958.Google Scholar
10. Ogle, R. E., and Warren, G. F. Fate and activity of herbicides in soils. Weeds 3:257–273. 1916.Google Scholar
11. Potter, R. S., and Snyder, R. S. Carbon and nitrogen in the soil variously treated with lime, ammonium sulphate, and sodium nitrate. Soil Sci. 1:76–95. 1916.Google Scholar
12. Reid, J. J. New herbicides cause no permanent soil damage. Science for the Farmer 7(1):14. 1959.Google Scholar
13. Schollenberger, C. J., and Simon, R. H. Determination of exchange capacity and exchangeable bases in soils. Soil Sci. 59:13–24. 1945.Google Scholar
14. Walkley, A., and Black, I. A. An examination of the Degtjareff method for determination of soil organic matter, and a proposed modification of the chromic acid titration method. Soil Sci. 37:29–38. 1934.Google Scholar
15. Woodruff, C. M. Testing soils for lime requirement by means of a buffered solution and the glass electrode. Soil Sci. 66:53–62. 1948.Google Scholar